Evaluating the population with intellectual disability unable to comply with routine dental treatment using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

Purpose. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of general anaesthesia (GA) among patients with intellectual disability (ID) in relation to the International Classification of Functioning (ICF). Method. Twenty-seven ICF codes related to the tolerance of the dental treatment were chosen. The sample consisted of 100 children with ID divided into two groups (50 patients in whom routine dental treatment had been accomplished and 50 patients who had been treated under GA). Differences between the groups were analysed using the chi-square test, bivariate correlation and multiple logistic regression analysis. Results. The GA group showed higher levels with regard to the following codes: b117 – intellectual function, b2801 – pain in head and neck, d310 – communication, d530 – toileting, d540 – dressing, e310 – immediate family, e5400 – transportation services and e5850 – education and training services. The severity of ID significantly correlated with the ‘Activities and Participation’ codes. Three predictors of GA treatment were identified: ‘Pain in head and neck’ (p  <  0.001), ‘Transportation services, systems and policies’ (p  <  0.05) and ‘Education and training services, systems and policies’ (p  <  0.05). Conclusions. The use of GA increases with the severity of ID. Acute and painful conditions result in more frequent use of GA. Unfavourable environmental factors present barrier to routine dental management.

[1]  B. Petrović,et al.  Factors influencing the decision to perform dental treatment under general anaesthesia in children with intellectual disability , 2008 .

[2]  S. Koscielny,et al.  Sedation with 50% nitrous oxide/oxygen for outpatient dental treatment in individuals with intellectual disability , 2007, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[3]  T. Miyawaki,et al.  Assessment of patients with intellectual disability using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health to evaluate dental treatment tolerability. , 2005, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[4]  B. Üstün,et al.  The role of Environment in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[5]  S. Ueda,et al.  The subjective dimension of functioning and disability: what is it and what is it for? , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[6]  Christopher G. Chute,et al.  From Clinical Records to Regulatory Reporting: Formal Terminologies as Foundation , 2003, Health care financing review.

[7]  A. Merry,et al.  Disability Part 1: The Disability Discrimination Act (1995) – implications for dentists , 2002, British Dental Journal.

[8]  A. Karidis,et al.  Oral health status in Greek children and teenagers, with disabilities. , 2002, The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.

[9]  H. Calache,et al.  A study of the dental treatment needs of children with disabilities in Melbourne, Australia. , 2001, Australian dental journal.

[10]  U. Lindh-Strömberg Rectal administration of midazolam for conscious sedation of uncooperative children in need of dental treatment. , 2001, Swedish dental journal.

[11]  L. Niessen Oral health and social justice: leadership opportunities for dentistry. , 2001, The Journal of the American College of Dentists.

[12]  M. Manley,et al.  sedation: Dental treatment for people with challenging behaviour: general anaesthesia or sedation? , 2000, British Dental Journal.

[13]  G. Tyrer Anaesthesia: Referrals for dental general anaesthetics — how many really need GA? , 1999, British Dental Journal.

[14]  T. B. Üstün,et al.  Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[15]  S. Livesey,et al.  Trends in exodontia under general anaesthesia at a dental teaching hospital , 1998, British Dental Journal.

[16]  Clayton Aj,et al.  The role of pre-general anaesthetic assessment for patients referred by general dental practitioners to the Community Dental Service. , 1996 .

[17]  Schuntermann Mf [International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps ICIDH--results and problems]. , 1996 .

[18]  D. Landes,et al.  The role of pre-general anaesthetic assessment for patients referred by general dental practitioners to the Community Dental Service. , 1996, Community dental health.

[19]  R. Lowry,et al.  General anaesthesia: who decides, and why? , 1994, BDJ.

[20]  C. Kalkman,et al.  A comparison of the effects of propofol and nitrous oxide on the electroencephalogram in epileptic patients during conscious sedation for dental procedures. , 1992, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[21]  D. Evans,et al.  A study of the dental health of children and young adults attending special schools in South Glamorgan. , 1991, International journal of paediatric dentistry.

[22]  T. D. Foster,et al.  Dental study of handicapped children attending special schools in Birmingham, UK. , 1986, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[23]  T. D. Foster,et al.  Dental study of handicapped children attending special schools in Birmingham. Part II. Dental cleanliness and periodontal treatment requirements. , 1985, Community dental health.

[24]  P. Sturmey,et al.  Management of dental hygiene for mentally handicapped people in residential settings. , 1983, Dental health.