Women are underrepresented in computational biology: An analysis of the scholarly literature in biology, computer science and computational biology

While women are generally underrepresented in STEM fields, there are noticeable differences between fields. For instance, the gender ratio in biology is more balanced than in computer science. We were interested in how this difference is reflected in the interdisciplinary field of computational/quantitative biology. To this end, we examined the proportion of female authors in publications from the PubMed and arXiv databases. There are fewer female authors on research papers in computational biology, as compared to biology in general. This is true across authorship position, year, and journal impact factor. A comparison with arXiv shows that quantitative biology papers have a higher ratio of female authors than computer science papers, placing computational biology in between its two parent fields in terms of gender representation. Both in biology and in computational biology, a female last author increases the probability of other authors on the paper being female, pointing to a potential role of female PIs in influencing the gender balance.

[1]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Is Science Built on the Shoulders of Women? A Study of Gender Differences in Contributorship , 2016, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[2]  Patricia Fara Women in science: Weird sisters? , 2013, Nature.

[3]  Kevin S. Bonham,et al.  gender-comp-bio: Pre-publication release , 2016 .

[4]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  What happens before? A field experiment exploring how pay and representation differentially shape bias on the pathway into organizations. , 2015, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  Andrea N. Hunt,et al.  What’s in a Name: Exposing Gender Bias in Student Ratings of Teaching , 2015, Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy.

[6]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  Men Set Their Own Cites High: Gender and Self-citation across Fields and over Time , 2016, ArXiv.

[7]  Ian M. Handley,et al.  Quality of evidence revealing subtle gender biases in science is in the eye of the beholder , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  M. Rossiter The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science , 1993 .

[9]  Marco Tullney,et al.  The Effect of Gender in the Publication Patterns in Mathematics , 2016, PloS one.

[10]  Sarah L. Eddy,et al.  Males Under-Estimate Academic Performance of Their Female Peers in Undergraduate Biology Classrooms , 2016, PloS one.

[11]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  The Role of Gender in Scholarly Authorship , 2012, PloS one.

[12]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science , 2013, Nature.

[13]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  On the Compliance of Women Engineers with a Gendered Scientific System , 2015, PloS one.

[14]  Giovanni Filardo,et al.  Trends and comparison of female first authorship in high impact medical journals: observational study (1994-2014) , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[15]  M. Graham,et al.  Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.