Dynamics of a technological innovator network and its impact on technological performance

Abstract This paper examines the dynamics of a technological innovator network (TIN) of a state-owned textile company in underdeveloped southwest China. It addresses two research questions: how the structure of the TIN evolved in the past 10 years; and what impact it had on the technological performance of the firm. The case study reveals that the general structure of the TIN and the positioning of the actors influence not only the amount of technological innovations but also the predominant type (product versus process innovations). TINs that are adequate for process innovation may not be as efficient for product innovation.

[1]  B. Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: User-Producer Relationships, National Systems of Innovation and Internationalisation , 2010 .

[2]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[3]  G. Gereffi,et al.  The governance of global value chains , 2005 .

[4]  Jesper Lindgaard Christensen,et al.  Product Innovation, Interactive Learning and Economic Performance , 2004 .

[5]  M. Bell,et al.  The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: evidence from a Chilean wine cluster , 2005 .

[6]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[7]  Yi-Ching Tsai Effect of Social Capital and Absorptive Capability on Innovation in Internet Marketing , 2006 .

[8]  R. Hanneman Introduction to Social Network Methods , 2001 .

[9]  C. Debresson,et al.  Networks of innovators:A review and introduction to the issue , 1991 .

[10]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Oxford handbook of innovation , 2006 .

[11]  Third Edition,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL ACTIVITIES: PROPOSED GUIDELINES FOR COLLECTING AND INTERPRETING INNOVATION DATA , 2005 .

[12]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Network Embeddedness and the Exploration of Novel Technologies: Technological Distance, Betweenness Centrality and Density , 2006 .

[13]  M. Porter Clusters and the new economics of competition. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[14]  James M. Utterback,et al.  The Effects of Communication on Technological Innovation , 1984 .

[15]  Johannes van Biesebroeck,et al.  Value chains, networks and clusters: reframing the global automotive industry , 2008 .

[16]  Anthony P. D’Costa,et al.  Export Growth and Path Dependence: The Locking-in of Innovations in the Software Industry , 2002 .

[17]  Ilkka Tuomi,et al.  Networks of Innovation , 2002 .

[18]  Philip Cooke,et al.  The new wave of regional innovation networks: Analysis, characteristics and strategy , 1996 .

[19]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Centrality and network flow , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[20]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[22]  O. Manual,et al.  Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development the Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data , 2022 .

[23]  Bing-Sheng Teng,et al.  Alliance Constellations: A Social Exchange Perspective , 2002 .

[24]  A. D’Costa Institutions and Industrial Governance in India: Learning to Cooperate the Japanese Way , 2003 .

[25]  M. Storper The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy , 1997 .

[26]  B. Lundvall,et al.  Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries , 2009 .

[27]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The knowledge-creating company , 2008 .

[28]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  The Economics of Knowledge and Learning , 2004 .

[29]  F. E. Principles of Economics , 1890, Nature.

[30]  Roberta Rabellotti,et al.  The Global Dimension of Innovation Systems: Linking Innovation Systems and Global Value Chains , 2010 .

[31]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Inter-Firm Collaboration, Learning and Networks , 2004 .

[32]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Putting Constructed Regional Advantage into Swedish Practice?. The case of the VINNVÄXT initiative 'Food Innovation at Interfaces' , 2008 .

[33]  Clive Savory,et al.  Translating knowledge to build technological competence , 2006 .

[34]  B. Nooteboom Inter-Firm Collaboration, Learning and Networks: An Integrated Approach , 2003 .

[35]  A. Malmberg,et al.  (How) Do (Firms in) Clusters Create Knowledge? , 2005 .

[36]  L. Carlsson,et al.  Network Governance of the Commons , 2007 .

[37]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  The Geography of Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems , 2006 .

[38]  Michael Gibbons,et al.  Introduction: `Mode 2' Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge , 2003 .

[39]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks : Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2007 .

[40]  J. Hagedoorn Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Nterorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences , 1993 .

[41]  C. Edquist,et al.  Institutions and Organizations in Systems of Innovation , 2013 .

[42]  B. Lundvall Dynamics of Industry and Innovation: Organizations, Networks and Systems National Innovation Systems -analytical Concept and Development Tool National Innovation Systems -analytical Concept and Development Tool National Innovation Systems -analytical Concept and Development Tool , 2022 .

[43]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[44]  Roberto Camagni,et al.  Innovation Networks , 1991 .

[45]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Sectoral Systems: How and Why Innovation Differs across Sectors , 2006 .

[46]  C. Gersick REVOLUTIONARY CHANGE THEORIES: A MULTILEVEL EXPLORATION OF THE PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM PARADIGM , 1991 .

[47]  P. Bonacich Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification , 1972 .

[48]  E. Andersen,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , 1992 .

[49]  B. Lundvall,et al.  Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation , 2007 .

[50]  John Scott Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[51]  Rajneesh Narula,et al.  Innovation systems and ‘inertia’ in R&D location: Norwegian firms and the role of systemic lock-in , 2002 .

[52]  John Hagedoorn,et al.  Organizational modes of inter-firm co-operation and technology transfer☆ , 1990 .

[53]  C. Freeman Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues , 1991 .

[54]  E. Roberts,et al.  Networks of innovators: a longitudinal perspective , 2003 .

[55]  Roberta Rabellotti,et al.  Innovation Systems and Global Value Chains , 2009 .

[56]  W. Diebold,et al.  The Second Industrial Divide , 1985 .

[57]  H. Ibarra NETWORK CENTRALITY, POWER, AND INNOVATION INVOLVEMENT: DETERMINANTS OF TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ROLES , 1993 .

[58]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Policy Change And Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach , 1993 .