Characterizing topology of ecological networks along gradients: The limits of metrics' standardization

Species interact in nature to form complex ecological networks. There has been a rising interest in recent years to characterize the topology of such networks along various gradients (e.g. successional, climatic, elevational) to better understand how they assemble in space and time. However, to compare structure of networks that vary in size, shape and connectance, topological metrics need to be standardized (as most metrics covary with such network attributes). Traditionally, this has been done by transforming network metrics into z-scores prior comparisons. Here, I show that such standardized metrics are not independent of basic network properties such as connectance. Instead, I found that there was a consistent tendency for z-scores to approach 0 when connectance progressively decreased and approached its minimal value. This is probably due to the reduced null space available for null models to randomize interactions at such low connectance. I discuss ways to circumvent the problem in future studies.

[1]  G. Woodward,et al.  Differential vulnerability of prey to an invading top predator: integrating field surveys and laboratory experiments , 2002 .

[2]  P. Guimarães,et al.  The structure of ant-plant ecological networks: is abundance enough? , 2014, Ecology.

[3]  Jochen Fründ,et al.  What do interaction network metrics tell us about specialization and biological traits? , 2008, Ecology.

[4]  N. Waser,et al.  Size-specific interaction patterns and size matching in a plant-pollinator interaction web. , 2009, Annals of botany.

[5]  Dénes Schmera,et al.  A new conceptual and methodological framework for exploring and explaining pattern in presence – absence data , 2011 .

[6]  Specialization and phenological synchrony of plant-pollinator interactions along an altitudinal gradient. , 2014, The Journal of animal ecology.

[7]  Luiz Fernando Bittencourt,et al.  MODULAR: Software for the Autonomous Computation of Modularity in Large Network Sets , 2013, ArXiv.

[8]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[9]  Wirt Atmar,et al.  The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat , 1993, Oecologia.

[10]  Jizhong Zhou,et al.  Phylogenetic Molecular Ecological Network of Soil Microbial Communities in Response to Elevated CO2 , 2011, mBio.

[11]  W. Ulrich.  Ecological interaction networks: prospects and pitfalls , 2009 .

[12]  Fernanda S. Valdovinos,et al.  Topological change of Andean plant–pollinator networks along an altitudinal gradient , 2010 .

[13]  J. Klironomos,et al.  Using ecological network theory to evaluate the causes and consequences of arbuscular mycorrhizal community structure. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[14]  P. Yodzis.  The Indeterminacy of Ecological Interactions as Perceived Through Perturbation Experiments , 1988 .

[15]  Luciano Cagnolo,et al.  Evaluating multiple determinants of the structure of plant-animal mutualistic networks. , 2009, Ecology.

[16]  Jolanta Miadlikowska,et al.  Host and geographic structure of endophytic and endolichenic fungi at a continental scale. , 2012, American journal of botany.

[17]  Ferenc Jordán,et al.  A new approach to exploring architecture of bipartite (interaction) ecological networks , 2014, J. Complex Networks.

[18]  Jane Memmott,et al.  Global warming and the disruption of plant-pollinator interactions. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[19]  R. Solé,et al.  Selection, Tinkering, and Emergence in Complex Networks - Crossing the Land of Tinkering , 2002 .

[20]  Diego P. Vázquez,et al.  ASYMMETRIC SPECIALIZATION: A PERVASIVE FEATURE OF PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS , 2004 .

[21]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS IN PLANT–POLLINATOR MUTUALISTIC NETWORKS , 2002 .

[22]  Luciano Cagnolo,et al.  Uniting pattern and process in plant-animal mutualistic networks: a review. , 2009, Annals of botany.

[23]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  A neutral‐niche theory of nestedness in mutualistic networks , 2008 .

[24]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement , 2008 .

[25]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  A consumer's guide to nestedness analysis , 2009 .

[26]  Dénes Schmera,et al.  A comparative evaluation of pairwise nestedness measures , 2012 .

[27]  Carlos J. Melián,et al.  The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.