Contextual Influences on the Use and Non-Use of Digital Technology While Exercising at the Gym

The use of wearable technology will become significantly more prevalent in the coming years, with major companies releasing devices such as the Samsung Gear Fit. With sensors, such as pedometers and heart rate monitors, embedded in these devices it is possible to use them for fitness purposes. However, little is known about how wearable adopters actually use wearable and existing technologies during exercise. In an exploratory situated study of technology use and non-use in the context of the gym, fitness informatics adopters showed varied practices related to distraction, appropriating technology into their routines, and information needs. We discuss this variance in relation to individual differences and the impact of the physical nature of the gym. Although further research might show other influencing factors such as the social context, we make a case for the use of situated studies to uncover tensions that lead to use and non-use of technology that arise in the different unfolding situations of using wearables in everyday life, including at the gym, which is a surprisingly complex context.

[1]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Introduction to This Special Issue on Context-Aware Computing , 2001, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[2]  Jakob E. Bardram,et al.  Plans as Situated Action: An Activity Theory Approach to Workflow Systems , 1997, ECSCW.

[3]  Minna Isomursu,et al.  Tracking Outdoor Sports - User Experience Perspective , 2008, AmI.

[4]  Brian C. Holtz,et al.  Flow for Exercise Adherence: Testing an Intrinsic Model of Health Behavior , 2013 .

[5]  Barry A. T. Brown,et al.  iPhone in vivo: video analysis of mobile device use , 2013, CHI.

[6]  Barbara Sternfeld,et al.  Physical activity and breast cancer , 1998, Cancer.

[7]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Refusing, limiting, departing: why we should study technology non-use , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[8]  M. Blais,et al.  Toward a New Measure of Intrinsic Motivation, Extrinsic Motivation, and Amotivation in Sports: The Sport Motivation Scale (SMS) , 1995 .

[9]  Luca Chittaro,et al.  Bringing mobile guides and fitness activities together: a solution based on an embodied virtual trainer , 2006, Mobile HCI.

[10]  James A. Landay,et al.  Conducting In Situ Evaluations for and With Ubiquitous Computing Technologies , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[11]  Elizabeth Goodman,et al.  Seeing fit: visualizing physical activity in context , 2006, CHI EA '06.

[12]  Minna Isomursu,et al.  Design of mobile wellness applications: identifying cross-cultural factors , 2008, OZCHI.

[13]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[14]  Holtzblatt Karen,et al.  Contextual Inquiry: A Participatory Technique for System Design , 2017 .

[15]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. , 1988 .

[16]  Rex Hartson,et al.  The UX book, process and guidelines for ensuring a quality user experience by Rex Hartson and Pardha S. Pyla , 2012, SOEN.

[17]  Nisheeth Gupta,et al.  Digital Fitness Connector: Smart Wearable System , 2011, 2011 First International Conference on Informatics and Computational Intelligence.

[18]  J. Annesi,et al.  Effects of music, television, and a combination entertainment system on distraction, exercise adherence, and physical output in adults. , 2001 .

[19]  Silvia Lindtner,et al.  Fish'n'Steps: Encouraging Physical Activity with an Interactive Computer Game , 2006, UbiComp.

[20]  Costas I. Karageorghis,et al.  Music in the exercise domain: a review and synthesis (Part I) , 2011, International review of sport and exercise psychology.

[21]  Joe Marshall,et al.  HCI and sports , 2014, Interactions.

[22]  Stephen S. Intille,et al.  Using wearable activity type detection to improve physical activity energy expenditure estimation , 2010, UbiComp.

[23]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[24]  Thomas Zimmermann,et al.  Persuasive technology in the real world: a study of long-term use of activity sensing devices for fitness , 2014, CHI.

[25]  Mark Blythe,et al.  Notes towards an ethnography of domestic technology , 2002, DIS '02.

[26]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Interaction design gone wild: striving for wild theory , 2011, INTR.

[27]  Robert J. Vallerand,et al.  An integrative analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport. , 1999 .

[28]  L. Suchman Plans and situated actions , 1987 .

[29]  Paul Dourish,et al.  What we talk about when we talk about context , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[30]  B. Speck,et al.  Effects of a Minimal Intervention to Increase Physical Activity in Women: Daily Activity Records , 2001, Nursing research.

[31]  J. Potteiger,et al.  Influence of Music on Ratings of Perceived Exertion during 20 Minutes of Moderate Intensity Exercise , 2000, Perceptual and motor skills.

[32]  Antti Oulasvirta,et al.  Understanding contexts by being there: case studies in bodystorming , 2003, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[33]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Gaining empathy for non-routine mobile device use through autoethnography , 2014, CHI.

[34]  William J. Stone,et al.  The Influence of Goal Setting on Exercise Adherence , 2000 .

[35]  David W. McDonald,et al.  Activity sensing in the wild: a field trial of ubifit garden , 2008, CHI.

[36]  M. Life iPhone in vivo : video analysis of mobile device use , 2013 .

[37]  Matthew Chalmers,et al.  Personal tracking as lived informatics , 2014, CHI.

[38]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Beyond the user: use and non-use in HCI , 2009, OZCHI.

[39]  M. Anshel,et al.  Effect of music and rhythm on physical performance. , 1978, Research quarterly.