Effect of Angle on Flow-Induced Vibrations of Pinniped Vibrissae

Two types of vibrissal surface structures, undulated and smooth, exist among pinnipeds. Most Phocidae have vibrissae with undulated surfaces, while Otariidae, Odobenidae, and a few phocid species possess vibrissae with smooth surfaces. Variations in cross-sectional profile and orientation of the vibrissae also exist between pinniped species. These factors may influence the way that the vibrissae behave when exposed to water flow. This study investigated the effect that vibrissal surface structure and orientation have on flow-induced vibrations of pinniped vibrissae. Laser vibrometry was used to record vibrations along the whisker shaft from the undulated vibrissae of harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) and northern elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris) and the smooth vibrissae of California sea lions (Zalophus californianus). Vibrations along the whisker shaft were measured in a flume tank, at three orientations (0°, 45°, 90°) to the water flow. The results show that vibration frequency and velocity ranges were similar for both undulated and smooth vibrissae. Angle of orientation, rather than surface structure, had the greatest effect on flow-induced vibrations. Vibration velocity was up to 60 times higher when the wide, flat aspect of the whisker faced into the flow (90°), compared to when the thin edge faced into the flow (0°). Vibration frequency was also dependent on angle of orientation. Peak frequencies were measured up to 270 Hz and were highest at the 0° orientation for all whiskers. Furthermore, CT scanning was used to quantify the three-dimensional structure of pinniped vibrissae that may influence flow interactions. The CT data provide evidence that all vibrissae are flattened in cross-section to some extent and that differences exist in the orientation of this profile with respect to the major curvature of the hair shaft. These data support the hypothesis that a compressed cross-sectional profile may play a key role in reducing self-noise of the vibrissae.

[1]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[2]  Kit M. Kovacs,et al.  Functional classification of harbor seal (Phoca vitulina) dives using depth profiles, swimming velocity, and an index of foraging success , 1999 .

[3]  T. Williams,et al.  Division of Comparative Physiology and Biochemistry , Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology Swimming Performance and Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Harbor Seals Phoca vitulina , 2016 .

[4]  Roger L. Gentry,et al.  Swimming velocities in otariids , 1990 .

[5]  K. Kovacs,et al.  Microstructure and innervation of the mystacial vibrissal follicle-sinus complex in bearded seals, Erignathus barbatus (Pinnipedia: Phocidae). , 2006, The anatomical record. Part A, Discoveries in molecular, cellular, and evolutionary biology.

[6]  H. Bleckmann,et al.  Seal whiskers detect water movements , 1998, Nature.

[7]  I. Holopainen,et al.  Aquatic Environment and Differentiation of Vibrissae: Comparison of Sinus Hair Systems of Ringed Seal, Otter and Pole Cat , 2009, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[8]  J. Ling.  The skin and hair of the southern elephant seal, Mirounga leonina (Linn.) I. The facial vibrissae , 1966 .

[9]  Frank E. Fish,et al.  Fused Traditional and Geometric Morphometrics Demonstrate Pinniped Whisker Diversity , 2012, PloS one.

[10]  A. Roshko.  On the drag and shedding frequency of two-dimensional bluff bodies , 1954 .

[11]  Guido Dehnhardt,et al.  Hydrodynamic trail following in a California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) , 2011, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[12]  Daniel P. Costa,et al.  Swim speed in a female northern elephant seal: metabolic and foraging implications , 1992 .

[13]  Lisa F. Shatz,et al.  The Frequency Response of the Vibrissae of Harp Seal, Pagophilus Groenlandicus, to Sound in Air and Water , 2013, PloS one.

[14]  H. Hyvärinen.  Diving in darkness: whiskers as sense organs of the ringed seal (Phoca hispida saimensis) , 1989 .

[15]  A Kaminski,et al.  Sensitivity of the mystacial vibrissae of harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) for size differences of actively touched objects. , 1995, The Journal of experimental biology.

[16]  H. Bleckmann,et al.  Hydrodynamic Trail-Following in Harbor Seals (Phoca vitulina) , 2001, Science.

[17]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Barn Owl Flight , 2012 .

[18]  F. Fish,et al.  Morphological analysis of the bumpy profile of phocid vibrissae , 2009 .

[19]  J. Hassrick,et al.  Swimming speed and foraging strategies of northern elephant seals , 2007 .

[20]  William A. Watkins,et al.  SENSORY BIOPHYSICS OF MARINE MAMMALS , 1985 .

[21]  Björn Mauck,et al.  Mechanoreception in Secondarily Aquatic Vertebrates , 2013 .

[22]  Sandra J Shefelbine,et al.  BoneJ: Free and extensible bone image analysis in ImageJ. , 2010, Bone.

[23]  Dana H. Ballard,et al.  Computer Vision , 1982 .

[24]  Frederike D. Hanke,et al.  Harbor seal vibrissa morphology suppresses vortex-induced vibrations , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[25]  J. Thewissen,et al.  Sensory Evolution on the Threshold: Adaptations in Secondarily Aquatic Vertebrates , 2008 .

[26]  Guido Dehnhardt,et al.  On the Wake Flow Dynamics behind Harbor Seal Vibrissae – A Fluid Mechanical Explanation for an Extraordinary Capability , 2012 .

[27]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Dynamic Perception: Workshop of the GI Section "Computer Vision" , 2004 .

[28]  Frederike D. Hanke,et al.  Flow sensing by pinniped whiskers , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  A. Roshko.  On the development of turbulent wakes from vortex streets , 1953 .

[30]  Laurens E Howle,et al.  Hydrodynamic flow control in marine mammals. , 2008, Integrative and comparative biology.