Implicit learning of fifth- and sixth-order sequential probabilities

Serial reaction time (SRT) task studies have established that people can implicitly learn sequential contingencies as complex as fourth-order probabilities. The present study examined people’s ability to learn fifth-order (Experiment 1) and sixth-order (Experiment 2) probabilities. Remarkably, people learned fifth- and sixth-order probabilities. This suggests that the implicit sequence learning mechanism can operate over a range of at least seven sequence elements.

[1]  Jill Lany,et al.  The Role of Prior Experience in Language Acquisition , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  M. Fischer.  Probing Spatial Working Memory with the Corsi Blocks Task , 2001, Brain and Cognition.

[3]  Pawel Lewicki,et al.  Acquisition of procedural knowledge about a pattern of stimuli that cannot be articulated , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  J. Gabrieli,et al.  Direct comparison of neural systems mediating conscious and unconscious skill learning. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  P. Frensch,et al.  Effects of presentation rate and individual differences in short-term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learning , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[6]  An Automated Administration of Corsi's Block-Tapping Test , 2000, Perceptual and motor skills.

[7]  Luis Jiménez,et al.  Qualitative differences between implicit and explicit sequence learning. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  J. Saffran.  Statistical Language Learning , 2003 .

[9]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  Dissociation in a serial response time task using a recognition measure: comment on Perruchet and Amorim (1992) , 1993 .

[10]  Michael A. Stadler,et al.  Handbook of implicit learning , 1998 .

[11]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Learning the structure of event sequences. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  Sunbin Song,et al.  Implicit probabilistic sequence learning is independent of explicit awareness. , 2007, Learning & memory.

[13]  Z. Dienes,et al.  Learning non-local dependencies , 2008, Cognition.

[14]  R. Engle,et al.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and learning: Evidence from the serial reaction time task , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[15]  D. Rubin,et al.  Contrasts and Effect Sizes in Behavioral Research , 1999 .

[16]  D. Grossi,et al.  Effects of Age, Education and Sex on Two Tests of Immediate Memory: A Study of Normal Subjects from 20 to 99 Years of Age , 1986, Perceptual and motor skills.

[17]  Gilbert Remillard,et al.  Implicit Learning of Second-, Third-, and Fourth-Order Adjacent and Nonadjacent Sequential Dependencies , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  M. C. Fastame,et al.  Working memory components of the Corsi blocks task. , 2004, British journal of psychology.

[19]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  The Relation Between Implicit and Explicit Learning: Evidence for Parallel Development , 1999 .

[20]  Xiaolan Fu,et al.  Implicit sequence learning and conscious awareness , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[21]  D. Shanks,et al.  Sequence learning and selection difficulty. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  M. A. Stadler,et al.  On learning complex procedural knowledge. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  Sunbin Song,et al.  Evidence for parallel explicit and implicit sequence learning systems in older adults , 2009, Behavioural Brain Research.

[24]  M. A. Stadler,et al.  Role of attention in implicit learning. , 1995 .

[25]  Peter A. Frensch,et al.  One concept, multiple meanings: On how to define the concept of implicit learning. , 1998 .

[26]  G. Remillard.  A program for generating randomized simple and context-sensitive sequences , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[27]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Mechanisms of Implicit Learning: Connectionist Models of Sequence Processing , 1993 .

[28]  J. Mcdowall,et al.  Indirect learning of event sequences: the effects of divided attention and stimulus continuity. , 1995, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[29]  P. Frensch,et al.  Implicit learning of unique and ambiguous serial transitions in the presence and absence of a distractor task. , 1994 .

[30]  N. Mackintosh,et al.  Psychometric intelligence dissociates implicit and explicit learning. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  Tim Curran,et al.  Attentional and Nonattentional Forms of Sequence Learning , 1993 .

[32]  G. Remillard,et al.  Implicit learning of first-, second-, and third-order transition probabilities. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  Response-to-stimulus interval does not affect implicit motor sequence learning, but does affect performance , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[34]  Peder J. Johnson,et al.  Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure. , 1994 .

[35]  R. Gómez,et al.  The Developmental Trajectory of Nonadjacent Dependency Learning. , 2005, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[36]  Richard B. Millward,et al.  PROBABILITY LEARNING: CONTINGENT-EVENT SCHEDULES WITH LAGS , 1972 .

[37]  Michael A. Stadler,et al.  Implicit serial learning: Questions inspired by Hebb (1961) , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[38]  Christopher M. Conway,et al.  Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key , 2010, Cognition.

[39]  J. Ashe,et al.  The representation of explicit motor sequence knowledge , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[40]  R. Gómez,et al.  Twelve-Month-Old Infants Benefit From Prior Experience in Statistical Learning , 2008, Psychological science.