External social capital and information systems development team flexibility

Context: ISD research based on the socio-technical perspective suggests that two sources of socio-technical change have a bearing on the performance of information systems development (ISD) projects: business requirements and development technology. To enhance project effectiveness, ISD teams need to enhance their flexibility in the face of the constant changes taking place from business and technical environments in which they operate. Flexibility is conceptualized as an outcome of capability development through constantly integrating and reconfiguring available resources within and outside of the organization where the team is embedded. Objective: The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between a team's external social capital and team flexibility. More specifically, based on social capital theory, this study argues that external social capital leads to IS team flexibility, which in turn contributes to the successful project performance. Method: A survey design was selected to collect data and test the proposed model. A snowballing strategy was employed to collect data. 118 information systems developers participated in the survey and the model was analyzed using partial least squares regression. Results: The findings show that, in general, the ISD teams' external social capital do contribute to the team's response to changes. However, they exhibit unique impacts on ISD team flexibility respectively. Results: The findings show that, in general, the ISD teams' external social capital does contribute to the team's response to changes. However, they exhibit unique impacts on ISD team flexibility respectively. Conclusion: The various external social capitals have distinctive effects on a team's flexibility. Specifically, horizontal relationships are positively associated with both business and technology flexibility. Vertical relationships are positively associated with business flexibility and market relationships technology flexibility. ISD managers should establish robust relationships with its high-ups, other lateral units, and third parties outside in the market. They also need to be more adaptive to the increasingly volatile socio-technical environment, and proactively search, exploit, upgrade, and integrate resources that are essential to the development of system development team flexibility.

[1]  Maria L. Kraimer,et al.  A Social Capital Theory of Career Success , 2001 .

[2]  Nancy Bogucki Duncan,et al.  Capturing Flexibility of Information Technology Infrastructure: A Study of Resource Characteristics and their Measure , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  J. Pinto,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation , 1993 .

[4]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[5]  F. McFarlan,et al.  Corporate Information Strategy and Management: Text and Cases , 2002 .

[6]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[7]  Catherine L. Wang,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities: A Review and Research Agenda , 2007 .

[8]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  G. Labianca,et al.  Group Social Capital and Group Effectiveness: The Role of Informal Socializing Ties , 2004 .

[10]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  An Information Company in Mexico: Extending the Resource-Based View of the Firm to a Developing Country Context , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  Xiaojun Zhang,et al.  Role of collective ownership and coding standards in coordinating expertise in software project teams , 2009, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Sarma R. Nidumolu A Comparison of the Structural Contingency and Risk-Based Perspectives on Coordination in Software Development Projects , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  D. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[14]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .

[15]  Shikhar Sarin,et al.  The Effect of Team Leader Characteristics on Learning, Knowledge Application, and Performance of Cross-Functional New Product Development Teams , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[16]  Connie J. G. Gersick,et al.  Social Psychology in Organizations: Advances in Theory and Research , 1994 .

[17]  Neil C. Ramiller,et al.  The Organizing Vision in Information Systems Innovation , 1997 .

[18]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital , 2000 .

[19]  Gary Klein,et al.  Project Risk Impact on Software Development Team Performance , 2000 .

[20]  Steven Durlauf,et al.  Social Capital , 2004 .

[21]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Searching for Common Threads: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups , 1996 .

[22]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept , 2002 .

[23]  Adel M. Aladwani An Integrated Performance Model of Information Systems Projects , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Gary Klein,et al.  Software development risks to project effectiveness , 2000, J. Syst. Softw..

[26]  D. Eden,et al.  Effects of crew composition on crew performance: Does the whole equal the sum of its parts? , 1985 .

[27]  Gary Klein,et al.  An exploration of the relationship between software development process maturity and project performance , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[28]  Weidong Xia,et al.  The ability of information systems development project teams to respond to business and technology changes: a study of flexibility measures , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Deborah G. Ancona,et al.  The classics and the contemporary--a new blend of small group theory , 1992 .

[30]  David Wilemon,et al.  Creating High-Performing Software Development Teams , 2005 .

[31]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage , 2000, MIS Q..

[32]  Sara A. McComb,et al.  Team flexibility's relationship to staffing and performance in complex projects: An empirical analysis , 2007 .

[33]  James J. Jiang,et al.  A Measure of Software Development Risk , 2002 .

[34]  J. K. Buckle,et al.  Managing Software Projects , 1977 .

[35]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[36]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The Role of Intermediating Institutions in the Diffusion of Electronic Data Interchange (EDI): How Industry Associations Intervened in Denmark, Finland, and Hong Kong , 2001, Inf. Soc..

[37]  J. C. Henderson,et al.  Managing I/S Design Teams: A Control Theories Perspective , 1992 .

[38]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[39]  Wynne W. Chin Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[40]  R. Burt The Network Structure Of Social Capital , 2000 .

[41]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  An information company in Mexico: extending the resource-based view of the firm , 1997, ICIS '97.

[42]  Terry Anthony Byrd,et al.  Measuring the Flexibility of Information Technology Infrastructure: Exploratory Analysis of a Construct , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[43]  G. Labianca,et al.  A Multilevel Model of Group Social Capital , 2006 .

[44]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[45]  S. Newell,et al.  The Role of Professional Associations in Technology Diffusion , 1995 .

[46]  R. Burt Structural Holes versus Network Closure as Social Capital , 2001 .

[47]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Developing and Validating an Observational Learning Model of Computer Software Training and Skill Acquisition , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..