A Cross-Culture Study on Multimodal Emotion Recognition Using Deep Learning

In this paper, we aim to investigate the similarities and differences of multimodal signals between Chinese and French on three emotions recognition task using deep learning. We use videos including positive, neutral and negative emotions as stimuli material. Both Chinese and French subjects wear electrode caps and eye tracking glass while doing experiments to collect electroencephalography (EEG) and eye movement data. To deal with the problem of lacking data for training deep neural networks, conditional Wasserstein generative adversarial network is adopted to generate EEG and eye movement data. The EEG and eye movement features are fused by using Deep Canonical Correlation Analysis to analyze the relationship between EEG and eye movement data. Our experimental results show that French has higher classification accuracy on beta frequency band while Chinese performs better on gamma frequency band. In addition, EEG signals and eye movement data of French participants have complementary characteristics in discriminating positive and negative emotions.

[1]  Hillary Anger Elfenbein,et al.  On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: a meta-analysis. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  Hiroshi Yokoi,et al.  Neural patterns between Chinese and Germans for EEG-based emotion recognition , 2017, 2017 8th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[3]  Bao-Liang Lu,et al.  Identifying Functional Brain Connectivity Patterns for EEG-Based Emotion Recognition , 2019, 2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[4]  Mohammad Soleymani,et al.  Analysis of EEG Signals and Facial Expressions for Continuous Emotion Detection , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[5]  H. Barrett,et al.  Vocal Emotion Recognition Across Disparate Cultures , 2008 .

[6]  Sarah K. Davis,et al.  Trait emotional intelligence and attentional bias for positive emotion: An eye tracking study , 2018, Personality and Individual Differences.

[7]  P. Ekman,et al.  DIFFERENCES Universals and Cultural Differences in the Judgments of Facial Expressions of Emotion , 2004 .

[8]  D. Sauter,et al.  Commonalities outweigh differences in the communication of emotions across human cultures [Letter to the editor] , 2013 .

[9]  S. Porges,et al.  Emotion Recognition in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Relations to Eye Gaze and Autonomic State , 2010, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[10]  A. Schaefer,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Cognition & Emotion Assessing the Effectiveness of a Large Database of Emotion-eliciting Films: a New Tool for Emotion Researchers , 2022 .

[11]  Sophie K. Scott,et al.  Cross-cultural recognition of basic emotions through nonverbal emotional vocalizations , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Bao-Liang Lu,et al.  Identifying Stable Patterns over Time for Emotion Recognition from EEG , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[13]  Yifei Lu,et al.  Combining Eye Movements and EEG to Enhance Emotion Recognition , 2015, IJCAI.

[14]  Wei Liu,et al.  Multi-view Emotion Recognition Using Deep Canonical Correlation Analysis , 2018, ICONIP.

[15]  Yun Luo,et al.  EEG Data Augmentation for Emotion Recognition Using a Conditional Wasserstein GAN , 2018, 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[16]  Bao-Liang Lu,et al.  Investigating Critical Frequency Bands and Channels for EEG-Based Emotion Recognition with Deep Neural Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development.

[17]  Oliver G. B. Garrod,et al.  Facial expressions of emotion are not culturally universal , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  L. Gerstein,et al.  The Impact of Gender and Intercultural Experiences on Emotion Recognition , 2016 .

[19]  Aaron C. Courville,et al.  Improved Training of Wasserstein GANs , 2017, NIPS.