Prognostic Relationship Between Coronary Artery Calcium Score, Perfusion Defects, and Myocardial Blood Flow Reserve in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

Background: Coronary artery calcium score (CACS) is an anatomic measure of calcified atherosclerosis. Myocardial perfusion defects and reduced myocardial blood flow reserve (MBFR) are physiological measures of ischemia and coronary circulatory health. We aimed to assess the relative prognostic importance of MBFR, perfusion defects, and CACS in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Methods: A total of 5983 consecutive patients without known history of coronary artery disease or cardiomyopathy, who underwent a CACS and 82Rb positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging between 2010 and 2016, were followed for all-cause death (n=785) over median of 3 years. Prognostic value was assessed using multivariable Cox regression models, and incremental risk discrimination for imaging variables was evaluated by comparing model c-indices after adjusting for clinical risk factors (RF). Results: Mean age was 67.1 years, 60% were female, and 83% were symptomatic. CACS was 0 in 22%, abnormal perfusion in 19%, and MBFR <2 in 53.3%. When added to RF, the model with MBFR had the best fit (c=0.78, P<0.0001). Addition of CACS to model with RF and perfusion (c=0.77) offered modest improvement in discrimination over the model with RF and perfusion (c=0.76, P=0.02). Adding CACS to a model with RF, perfusion, and MBFR did not provide incremental prognostic value (c=0.785 for both, P=0.16). CACS and MBFR both had independent prognostic value in patients with normal and abnormal myocardial perfusion imaging. Even among patients with CACS of 0, MBFR <2 was present in 37.8%, being associated with higher risk of death (hazard ratio per 0.1↓, 1.10 [1.04–1.15]; P<0.001), but perfusion defects were not. Conclusions: Use of anatomic testing such as CACS of 0 to avoid myocardial perfusion imaging in symptomatic patients could lead to missing microvascular dysfunction in 4 out of 10 patients, a finding associated with a high mortality risk. Higher CACS was independently associated with the risk of death but did not provide incremental prognostic value over positron emission tomography with MBFR.

[1]  D. Berman,et al.  Interplay of Coronary Artery Calcium and Risk Factors for Predicting CVD/CHD Mortality: The CAC Consortium. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[2]  J. Spertus,et al.  Ischemia on PET MPI May Identify Patients With Improvement in Angina and Health Status Post-Revascularization. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  Randall C. Thompson,et al.  Myocardial blood flow reserve assessed by positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging identifies patients with a survival benefit from early revascularization. , 2019, European heart journal.

[4]  E. V. van Beek,et al.  Coronary CT Angiography and 5‐Year Risk of Myocardial Infarction , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Juhani Knuuti,et al.  ASNC imaging guidelines/SNMMI procedure standard for positron emission tomography (PET) nuclear cardiology procedures , 2016, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[6]  E. Argulian,et al.  CACS and the Frequency of Stress-Induced Myocardial Ischemia During MPI: A Meta-Analysis. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[7]  M. Budoff,et al.  Motivational effects of coronary artery calcium scores on statin adherence and weight loss , 2015, Coronary artery disease.

[8]  John O. Prior,et al.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow in absolute terms using (82)Rb PET imaging: the RUBY-10 Study. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[9]  R. Blankstein,et al.  Prognostic interplay of coronary artery calcification and underlying vascular dysfunction in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  M. Blaha,et al.  Utility of coronary artery calcium scoring in the evaluation of patients with chest pain. , 2012, Critical pathways in cardiology.

[11]  Daniel S Berman,et al.  Impact of coronary artery calcium scanning on coronary risk factors and downstream testing the EISNER (Early Identification of Subclinical Atherosclerosis by Noninvasive Imaging Research) prospective randomized trial. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Impact of clinical presentation and pretest likelihood on the relation between calcium score and computed tomographic coronary angiography. , 2010, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  Udo Hoffmann,et al.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of absence of coronary artery calcification. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[14]  R. Blumenthal,et al.  Effect of patient visualization of coronary calcium by electron beam computed tomography on changes in beneficial lifestyle behaviors. , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  Frank J. Rybicki,et al.  Interrelation of Coronary Calcification, Myocardial Ischemia, and Outcomes in Patients With Intermediate Likelihood of Coronary Artery Disease: A Combined Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Study , 2008, Circulation.

[16]  M. Pencina,et al.  Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  Ran Klein,et al.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb dynamic PET imaging , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[18]  N. Mullani,et al.  Coronary flow and flow reserve by PET simplified for clinical applications using rubidium-82 or nitrogen-13-ammonia. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  P. Herrero,et al.  Implementation and evaluation of a two-compartment model for quantification of myocardial perfusion with rubidium-82 and positron emission tomography. , 1992, Circulation research.

[20]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .