Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste: A Long-Term Socio-Technical Experiment

In this article we investigate whether long-term radioactive waste management by means of geological disposal can be understood as a social experiment. Geological disposal is a rather particular technology in the way it deals with the analytical and ethical complexities implied by the idea of technological innovation as social experimentation, because it is presented as a technology that ultimately functions without human involvement. We argue that, even when the long term function of the ‘social’ is foreseen to be restricted to safeguarding the functioning of the ‘technical’, geological disposal is still a social experiment. In order to better understand this argument and explore how it could be addressed, we elaborate the idea of social experimentation with the notion of co-production and the analytical tools of delegation, prescription and network as developed by actor-network theory. In doing so we emphasize that geological disposal inherently involves relations between surface and subsurface, between humans and nonhumans, between the social, material and natural realm, and that these relations require recognition and further elaboration. In other words, we argue that geological disposal concurrently is a social and a technical experiment, or better, a long-term socio-technical experiment. We end with proposing the idea of ‘actor-networking’ as a sensitizing concept for future research into what geological disposal as a socio-technical experiment could look like.

[1]  Jantine Schröder Radioactive Waste Management: The Relation Between Geological Disposal and Advanced Nuclear Technologies , 2013 .

[2]  THE LONG TERM STORAGE OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE : SAFETY AND SUSTAINABILITY , 2022 .

[3]  Harold W. Lewis,et al.  Nuclear Reactions: Science and Trans-Science , 1992 .

[4]  T Schneider,et al.  ICRP Publication 122: Radiological Protection in Geological Disposal of Long-lived Solid Radioactive Waste , 2013, Annals of the ICRP.

[5]  R. V. Schomberg A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation , 2013 .

[6]  Radiological protection policy for the disposal of radioactive waste. Adopted by the Commission in May 1997. The International Commission on Radiation Protection. , 1997, Annals of the ICRP.

[7]  C. W. Forsberg,et al.  Advanced Reactors, Passive Safety, and Acceptance of Nuclear Energy , 1990 .

[8]  G.Q. Zhang,et al.  Strategic Research Agenda of "More than Moore" , 2006, EuroSime 2006 - 7th International Conference on Thermal, Mechanical and Multiphysics Simulation and Experiments in Micro-Electronics and Micro-Systems.

[9]  A. M. Weinberg Beyond the technological fix. [Detrimental and unforeseen side effects] , 1978 .

[10]  B. Latour Technology is Society Made Durable , 1990 .

[11]  Behnam Taebi,et al.  Intergenerational Risks of Nuclear Energy , 2012 .

[12]  G. F. Bennett,et al.  The principles of radioactive waste management , 1997 .

[13]  S. Gusmeroli,et al.  Strategic research agenda , 2010 .

[14]  Mats Andrén Nuclear Waste Management and Legitimacy: Nihilism and Responsibility , 2012 .

[15]  Clive Hamilton,et al.  The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis , 2015 .

[16]  S. Chakraborty Safety of nuclear power reactors in the former Eastern European countries , 1995 .

[17]  Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management , 2003 .

[18]  Moving Forward with Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste , 2008 .

[19]  J. Newell Project Final Report , 2005 .

[20]  O. Amsterdamska Book Review : Surely You Are Joking, Monsieur Latour!Science in Action, by Bruno Latour. Milton Keynes: Open University Press: 1987, 274 pp. $25.00. Also available in paper from Harvard University Press, $12.95 , 1990 .

[21]  Will C. van den Hoonaard,et al.  Working with Sensitizing Concepts: Analytical Field Research , 1996 .

[22]  E. Gilboa-Schechtman,et al.  Real-Life Experiments , 2008 .

[23]  Dimitri Mortelmans,et al.  Handboek kwalitatieve onderzoeksmethoden , 2013 .

[24]  Amelia de Kageneck,et al.  The Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management , 1998, International and Comparative Law Quarterly.

[25]  Wolfgang Krohn,et al.  Society as a laboratory: the social risks of experimental research , 1994 .

[26]  S. Jasanoff States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order , 2004 .

[27]  Constance Perin,et al.  Operating as Experimenting: Synthesizing Engineering and Scientific Values in Nuclear Power Production , 1998 .

[28]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change ed. by Wiebe E. Bijker, John Law (review) , 1994, Technology and Culture.

[29]  B. Wynne Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. , 1992 .

[30]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  The Secret of Yucca Mountain: Reflections on an Object in Extremis , 2005 .

[31]  B. Latour Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies , 1999 .

[32]  B. Latour On Technical Mediation , 1994 .

[33]  Peter Kroes,et al.  The dual nature of technical artefacts , 2006 .

[34]  M. Gorman,et al.  A framework for responsible innovation , 2013 .

[35]  J. Law TECHNOLOGY AND HETEROGENEOUS ENGINEERING: THE CASE OF PORTUGUESE EXPANSION , 2018, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY STUDIES.

[36]  W. Weiss Report of ICRP Task Group 80: ‘Radiological protection in geological disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste’ , 2012, Annals of the ICRP.

[37]  A. Stirling “Opening Up” and “Closing Down” , 2008 .

[38]  Science policy and university research: Canada and the USA, 1979-1999 , 2002 .

[39]  Ibo van de Poel,et al.  Nuclear Energy as a Social Experiment , 2011 .

[40]  H Roberts,et al.  Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity , 1994 .

[41]  Bruno Latour,et al.  Which protocol for the new collective experiments , 2006 .

[42]  Colin Cargill,et al.  Project final report , 2008 .

[44]  A M Weinberg,et al.  Social institutions and nuclear energy. , 1972, Science.

[45]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology , 1989 .

[46]  T. Hellström,et al.  Systemic innovation and risk: technology assessment and the challenge of responsible innovation , 2003 .

[47]  Jeroen van den Hoven,et al.  Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches, and Applications , 2015 .

[48]  B. Latour Telling friends from foes at the time of the Anthropocene , 2014, Revista de Antropologia.

[49]  A. Rip,et al.  The past and future of constructive technology assessment , 1997 .

[50]  S. Krupar Transnatural ethics: revisiting the nuclear cleanup of Rocky Flats, CO, through the queer ecology of Nuclia Waste , 2012 .

[51]  Zygmunt Bauman,et al.  Postmodernity and its Discontents , 1997 .

[52]  M. Lynch,et al.  The handbook of science and technology studies , 2008 .

[53]  S. Fuller Why Science Studies Has Never Been Critical of Science , 2000 .

[54]  OUTLINE OF A DISPOSAL CONCEPT IN CLAY , 2014 .