Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings – 1. Patterns of benefit
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Wouter A. Dreschler,et al. ICRA Noises: Artificial Noise Signals with Speech-like Spectral and Temporal Properties for Hearing Instrument Assessment: Ruidos ICRA: Señates de ruido artificial con espectro similar al habla y propiedades temporales para pruebas de instrumentos auditivos , 2001 .
[2] G Keidser. Selecting different amplification for different listening conditions. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[3] D. Markle,et al. Hearing Aids , 1936, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.
[4] H Levitt,et al. Effect of release time in compression hearing aids: paired-comparison judgments of quality. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] C Elberling,et al. A Digital Filterbank Hearing Aid: Predicting User Preference And Performance For Two Signal Processing Algorithms , 1997, Ear and hearing.
[6] G Keidser,et al. Candidates for Multiple Frequency Response Characteristics , 1995, Ear and hearing.
[7] H Levitt,et al. The effect of compression ratio and release time on the categorical rating of sound quality. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] R M Cox,et al. Maturation of hearing aid benefit: objective and subjective measurements. , 1992, Ear and hearing.
[10] Ruth A. Bentler,et al. Assessing Release-Time Options in a Two-Channel AGC Hearing Aid , 1997 .
[11] M C Martin,et al. Is AGC beneficial in hearing aids? , 1984, British journal of audiology.
[12] G Naylor. Technical and audiological factors in the implementation and use of digital signal processing hearing aids. , 1997, Scandinavian audiology.
[13] M. Palmer. Clinical Trials: A Practical Approach , 1985 .
[14] R A Bentler,et al. Effects of release time and directionality on unilateral and bilateral hearing aid fittings in complex sound fields. , 2001, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[15] R A Bentler,et al. The effect of test signal type and bandwidth on the categorical scaling of loudness. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[16] B C Moore,et al. A comparison of four methods of implementing automatic gain control (AGC) in hearing aids. , 1988, British journal of audiology.
[17] L B Jerlvall,et al. The influence of attack time and release time on speech intelligibility. A study of the effects of AGC on normal hearing and hearing impaired subjects. , 1978, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.
[18] R M Cox,et al. Composite speech spectrum for hearing and gain prescriptions. , 1988, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[19] Stuart Gatehouse,et al. Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile: Derivation and Validation of a Client-centered Outcome Measure for Hearing Aid Services , 1999 .
[20] H. Dillon,et al. Guidelines for fitting multiple memory hearing aids. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[21] S Gatehouse,et al. Apparent auditory deprivation effects of late onset: the role of presentation level. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[22] R M Cox,et al. Measuring Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life: the SADL scale. , 1999, Ear and hearing.
[23] V Pluvinage,et al. Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1992, Ear and hearing.
[24] Martin Hansen. Effects of Multi-Channel Compression Time Constants on Subjectively Perceived Sound Quality and Speech Intelligibility , 2002, Ear and hearing.
[25] C Elberling. Loudness scaling revisited. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[26] Graham Naylor,et al. Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings – 2. Patterns of candidature , 2006, International journal of audiology.
[27] R. M. Cox,et al. Administration And Application Of The APHAB , 1997 .
[28] Graham Naylor,et al. Benefits from hearing aids in relation to the interaction between the user and the environment , 2003, International journal of audiology.
[29] S Gatehouse,et al. Role of perceptual acclimatization in the selection of frequency responses for hearing aids. , 1993, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[30] B C Moore,et al. Effect on the speech reception threshold in noise of the recovery time of the compressor in the high-frequency channel of a two-channel aid. , 1993, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.
[31] I V Nábĕlek,et al. A comparison of hearing aids with amplitude compression. , 1977, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[32] M P Haggard,et al. The four alternative auditory feature test (FAAF)--linguistic and psychometric properties of the material with normative data in noise. , 1987, British journal of audiology.
[33] Robyn M. Cox,et al. The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit , 1995, Ear and hearing.
[34] R C Seewald,et al. The input/output formula: a theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[35] John C. Ellison,et al. Effect of release time on preferred gain and speech acoustics. , 2004, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[36] G D Causey,et al. The relative importance of recovery time in compression hearing aids. , 1977, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[37] H. Dillon,et al. Gain, frequency response, and maximum output requirements for hearing aids. , 1996, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.
[38] H. Dillon,et al. The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) New Procedure for Selecting the Gain and Frequency Response of a Hearing Aid , 1986, Ear and hearing.
[39] B C Moore,et al. Comparison of different forms of compression using wearable digital hearing aids. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[40] Michael Valente,et al. The Independent Hearing Aid Fitting Forum (IHAFF) Protocol , 1997, Trends in amplification.
[41] T Lunner,et al. A Digital Filterbank Hearing Aid: Three Digital Signal Processing Algorithms‐User Preference and Performance , 1997, Ear and hearing.
[42] G Keidser,et al. NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. , 2001, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[43] S Gatehouse,et al. Components and Determinants of Hearing Aid Benefit , 1994, Ear and hearing.
[44] Brian C. J. Moore,et al. The effect on speech intelligibility of varying compression time constants in a digital hearing aid , 2004, International journal of audiology.
[45] W. Noble,et al. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) , 2004, International journal of audiology.
[46] Recommended procedures for pure-tone audiometry using a manually operated instrument. , 1981, The Journal of laryngology and otology.
[47] Robyn M. Cox,et al. Using Loudness Data for Hearing Aid Selection: The IHAFF Approach , 1995 .
[48] James M. Kates,et al. Digital hearing aids. , 2008, Harvard health letter.
[49] W. Noble. Self-assessment of hearing and related functions , 1998 .
[50] A Gabrielsson,et al. Perceived sound quality of hearing aids. , 1979, Scandinavian audiology.
[51] H Dillon. Tutorial Compression? Yes, But for Low or High Frequencies, for Low or High Intensities, and with What Response Times? , 1996, Ear and hearing.
[52] W. Dreschler,et al. ICRA noises: artificial noise signals with speech-like spectral and temporal properties for hearing instrument assessment. International Collegium for Rehabilitative Audiology. , 2001, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.