Comparison of regularization methods for moving force identification with ill-posed problems

Abstract Four new methods have been developed to overcome the ill-posed problems inherently existing in moving force identification (MFI) in previous studies. This paper is an extension of the work to evaluate the overall performance of these presented methods by numerical simulations and experiment verifications in laboratory. A simply-supported bridge and two types of moving forces are adopted to evaluate the identification accuracy and ill-posed immunity of these new approaches. Bending moment and acceleration responses are measured when the time-varying forces moving across the bridge deck at constant speed. Numerical simulations of both uniaxial and biaxial forces include 12 cases, which are used to compare the identification accuracy and ill-posed immunity of these methods in detail. Finally, a hinge supported steel beam model and a vehicle model were designed and fabricated in laboratory. Then a series of experimental studies on MFI with these four methods are performed in laboratory. Both numerical and experimental results show that these four approaches can accurately identify moving forces with strong robustness and ill-posed immunity. Moreover, the truncated generalized singular value decomposition (TGSVD) method has higher identification accuracy than the piecewise polynomial truncated singular value decomposition (PP-TSVD) method, and the modified preconditioned conjugate gradient (M-PCG) method has higher identification efficiency than the preconditioned least square QR-factorization (PLSQR) method. To summarize, if the first goal in MFI is to improve the identification accuracy, the TGSVD method is recommended due to its high identification accuracy and stability in different cases. If the first goal in MFI is to improve the identification efficiency, the M-PCG method is recommended due to its high identification efficiency and easy to determine the optimal number of iterations.

[1]  Zhen Chen,et al.  A truncated generalized singular value decomposition algorithm for moving force identification with ill-posed problems , 2017 .

[2]  Youxiang Xie,et al.  A new fast convergent iteration regularization method , 2018, Engineering with Computers.

[3]  Tommy H.T. Chan,et al.  A MOM-based algorithm for moving force identification: Part I . Theory and numerical simulation , 2008 .

[4]  Mathieu Aucejo,et al.  A multiplicative regularization for force reconstruction , 2017 .

[5]  Tommy H.T. Chan,et al.  Moving force identification: A time domain method , 1997 .

[6]  Chudong Pan,et al.  Moving force identification based on redundant concatenated dictionary and weighted l 1 -norm regularization , 2018 .

[7]  David Thompson,et al.  The quantification of structure-borne transmission paths by inverse methods. Part 1: Improved singular value rejection methods , 2003 .

[8]  Huajiang Ouyang,et al.  Moving-load dynamic problems: A tutorial (with a brief overview) , 2011 .

[9]  Zhou Feng,et al.  A Comparative Study of Regularization Method in Structure Load Identification , 2018, Shock and Vibration.

[10]  Xu Han,et al.  An efficient method to reduce ill-posedness for structural dynamic load identification , 2017 .

[11]  Dejie Yu,et al.  Dynamic load identification for stochastic structures based on Gegenbauer polynomial approximation and regularization method , 2015 .

[12]  Tommy H.T. Chan,et al.  Recent research on identification of moving loads on bridges , 2007 .

[13]  Zhichun Yang,et al.  Experimental study of random dynamic loads identification based on weighted regularization method , 2015 .

[14]  Tommy H.T. Chan,et al.  Moving force identification based on modified preconditioned conjugate gradient method , 2018, Journal of Sound and Vibration.

[15]  Xuefeng Chen,et al.  An enhanced sparse regularization method for impact force identification , 2019, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[16]  Tommy H.T. Chan,et al.  Moving force identification - A frequency and time domains analysis , 1999 .

[17]  Hao Sun,et al.  A non-negative Bayesian learning method for impact force reconstruction , 2019, Journal of Sound and Vibration.

[18]  David Thompson,et al.  The Quantification of Structure-Borne Transmission Paths by Inverse Methods - Part 2: Use of Regularization Techniques , 2003 .

[19]  Baijie Qiao,et al.  Impact-force sparse reconstruction from highly incomplete and inaccurate measurements , 2016 .

[20]  Tommy H.T. Chan,et al.  A MOM-based algorithm for moving force identification: Part II . Experiment and comparative studies , 2008 .

[21]  Siu-Seong Law,et al.  Comparative studies on moving force identification from bridge strains in laboratory , 2000 .

[22]  Qiaofeng Li,et al.  A hierarchical Bayesian method for vibration-based time domain force reconstruction problems , 2018 .

[23]  S. S. Law,et al.  An interpretive method for moving force identification , 1999 .

[24]  Zhibin Zhao,et al.  Group sparse regularization for impact force identification in time domain , 2019, Journal of Sound and Vibration.

[25]  Qiaofeng Li,et al.  A revised time domain force identification method based on Bayesian formulation , 2019, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering.

[26]  Achiya Dax,et al.  A modified Gram–Schmidt algorithm with iterative orthogonalization and column pivoting , 2000 .

[27]  Jiang Wensong,et al.  A fractional-order accumulative regularization filter for force reconstruction , 2018 .

[28]  Zhen Chen,et al.  Toward efficacy of piecewise polynomial truncated singular value decomposition algorithm in moving force identification , 2019, Advances in Structural Engineering.

[29]  M. Aucejo,et al.  On a full Bayesian inference for force reconstruction problems , 2018 .

[30]  Yunju Yan,et al.  Study on solving the ill-posed problem of force load reconstruction , 2019, Journal of Sound and Vibration.

[31]  Xu Han,et al.  Time‐domain Galerkin method for dynamic load identification , 2016 .

[32]  Zhen Chen,et al.  Identification of vehicle axle loads from bridge responses using preconditioned least square QR-factorization algorithm , 2019, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[33]  Mathieu Aucejo,et al.  An optimal Bayesian regularization for force reconstruction problems , 2019 .

[34]  D. Thompson,et al.  Comparison of methods for parameter selection in Tikhonov regularization with application to inverse force determination , 2007 .

[35]  Hai Tran,et al.  Development of wavelet deconvolution technique for impact force reconstruction: Application to reconstruction of impact force acting on a load-cell , 2018, International Journal of Impact Engineering.

[36]  H. Inoue,et al.  Review of inverse analysis for indirect measurement of impact force , 2001 .

[37]  Siu-Seong Law,et al.  Moving Force Identification Studies I: Theory , 2001 .

[38]  Siu-Seong Law,et al.  Moving Force Identification Studies II: Comparative Studies , 2001 .

[39]  Maria Q. Feng,et al.  Simultaneous identification of bridge structural parameters and vehicle loads , 2015 .

[40]  Mathieu Aucejo,et al.  On a general Iteratively Reweighted algorithm for solving force reconstruction problems , 2019 .

[41]  J. Ou,et al.  Force identification of dynamic systems using virtual work principle , 2015 .

[42]  Tommy H.T. Chan,et al.  Dynamic wheel loads from bridge strains , 1988 .

[43]  C. Jiang,et al.  A novel computational inverse technique for load identification using the shape function method of moving least square fitting , 2014 .

[44]  R. Abbasnia,et al.  Simultaneous identification of moving loads and structural damage by adjoint variable , 2015 .