Passive reverberation nulling for target enhancement.

Echo-to-reverberation enhancement previously has been demonstrated using time reversal focusing when knowledge of the channel response between a target and the source array elements is available. In the absence of this knowledge, direct focusing is not possible. However, active reverberation nulling still is feasible given observations of reverberation from conventional source array transmissions. For a given range of interest, the response between the source array elements and the dominant sources of boundary reverberation is provided by the corresponding reverberation from this range. Thus, an active transmission can be projected from the source array which minimizes the energy interacting with the boundaries at a given range while still ensonifying the waveguide between the boundaries. As an alternative, here a passive reverberation nulling concept is proposed. In a similar fashion, the observed reverberation defines the response between the source array elements and the dominant sources of boundary reverberation at each range and this is used to drive a range-dependent sequence of projection operators. When these projection operators subsequently are applied to the received data vectors, reverberation can be diminished. The improvement in target detectability is demonstrated using experimental data with an echo repeater simulating the presence of a target.

[1]  Peter Gerstoft,et al.  Null broadening with snapshot-deficient covariance matrices in passive sonar , 2003 .

[2]  W. Kuperman,et al.  Iterative time reversal in the ocean , 1997 .

[3]  William S. Hodgkiss,et al.  ECHO-TO-REVERBERATION ENHANCEMENT USING A TIME REVERSAL MIRROR , 2004 .

[4]  W. Kuperman,et al.  A nonreciprocal implementation of time reversal in the ocean , 2004 .

[5]  Karim G. Sabra,et al.  Experimental demonstration of time‐reversed reverberation focusing in a rough waveguide. Application to target detection , 2005 .

[6]  William S. Hodgkiss,et al.  Under-ice reverberation rejection , 1985, ICASSP '85. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[7]  W. Kuperman,et al.  Time reversed reverberation focusing in a waveguide. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Henry Cox,et al.  Multi-rate adaptive beamforming (MRABF) , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop. SAM 2000 (Cat. No.00EX410).

[9]  H. Cox,et al.  Robust DMR and multi-rate adaptive beamforming , 1997, Conference Record of the Thirty-First Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (Cat. No.97CB36136).

[10]  I. Kirsteins,et al.  On the probability density of signal-to-noise ratio in an improved adaptive detector , 1984, ICASSP '85. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[11]  William S. Hodgkiss,et al.  Adaptive Reverberation Nulling Using a Time Reversal Mirror , 2004 .

[12]  H. Cox.  Space-time processing for suppression of bottom reverberation , 1995, Conference Record of The Twenty-Ninth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[13]  William S. Hodgkiss,et al.  Experimental demonstration of adaptive reverberation nulling using time reversal , 2005 .

[14]  William S. Hodgkiss,et al.  A time-reversal mirror with variable range focusing , 1998 .

[15]  Alex B. Gershman,et al.  Experimental results of localization of moving underwater signal by adaptive beamforming , 1995, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..