Graphic Organizers and Their Effects on the Reading Comprehension of Students with LD

Previous research studies examining the effects of graphic organizers on reading comprehension for students with learning disabilities (LD) are reviewed. An extensive search of the professional literature between 1963 and June 2001 yielded a total of 21 group design intervention studies that met the criteria for inclusion in the synthesis. Using graphic organizers (i.e., semantic organizers, framed outlines, cognitive maps with and without a mnemonic) was associated with improved reading comprehension overall for students with LD. Compared to standardized reading measures, researcher-developed comprehension measures were associated with higher effect sizes. Initial gains demonstrated when using graphic organizers were not revealed during later comprehension tasks or on new comprehension tasks.

[1]  F. Vellutino,et al.  Differential transfer in poor and normal readers. , 1975, The Journal of genetic psychology.

[2]  B. Wong.  The Effects of Directive Cues on the Organization of Memory and Recall in Good and Poor Readers , 1978 .

[3]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Teaching Reading Comprehension Strategies to Students With Learning Disabilities: A Review of Research , 2001 .

[4]  Pamela J. Dunston,et al.  A critique of graphic organizer research , 1991 .

[5]  Cynthia C. Griffin,et al.  THE EFFECT OF GRAPHIC ORGANIZERS ON STUDENTS’ COMPREHENSION AND RECALL OF EXPOSITORY TEXT: A REVIEW OF THE RESEARCH AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE , 1995 .

[6]  R. Mayer.  Aids to text comprehension , 1984 .

[7]  T. Lovitt,et al.  The Effectiveness of Graphic Organizers for Three Classifications of Secondary Students in Content Area Classes , 1990, Journal of learning disabilities.

[8]  Edward J. Kameenui,et al.  INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF GRAPHIC ORGANIZER INSTRUCTION ON THE COMPREHENSION AND RECALL OF SCIENCE CONTENT BY STUDENTS WITH LEARNING DISABILITIES , 1991 .

[9]  K. Rayner,et al.  Cerebral organization and reading disabiliy , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  T. Lovitt,et al.  Adapting Science Materials for Regular and Learning Disabled Seventh Graders , 1986 .

[11]  R. Rosenthal.  Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1984 .

[12]  D. Carnine,et al.  Teaching Content Area Material to Learning Disabled Students , 1986, Exceptional children.

[13]  N. Heath,et al.  Prevalence and Expression of Depressive Symptomatology in Students with and without Learning Disabilities , 2000 .

[14]  Joseph R. Boyle.  The Effects of a Venn Diagram Strategy on the Literal, Inferential, and Relational Comprehension of Students with Mild Disabilities. , 2000 .

[15]  Joseph R. Boyle,et al.  Blueprints for Learning , 1997 .

[16]  C. Darch,et al.  Visual Displays To Increase Comprehension of High School Learning-Disabled Students , 1986 .

[17]  Camille L. Z. Blachowicz,et al.  Reading Comprehension: Strategies for Independent Learners , 2001 .

[18]  J. Kauffman,et al.  Teaching Students With Learning and Behavior Problems , 1986 .

[19]  John E. Readence,et al.  A Quantitative and Qualitative Review of Graphic Organizer Research , 1984 .

[20]  Richard Sinatra,et al.  Improving reading comprehension of disabled readers through semantic mapping , 1984 .

[21]  Betsy Jane Becker,et al.  Synthesizing standardized mean‐change measures , 1988 .

[22]  John Wills Lloyd,et al.  Designing High-Quality Research in Special Education , 2000 .

[23]  S. Vaughn,et al.  Reading Outcomes for Students with and without Reading Disabilities in General Education Middle-School Content Area Classes , 2000 .

[24]  Diane Pedrotty Rivera,et al.  Teaching Students With Learning and Behavior Problems , 1988 .

[25]  D. Ausubel.  The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. , 1963 .

[26]  Candace S. Bos,et al.  Using Interactive Teaching and Learning Strategies to Promote Text Comprehension and Content Learning for Students with Learning Disabilities. , 1992 .

[27]  Lignugaris,et al.  Using Content Enhancements to Improve the Performance of Adolescents with Learning Disabilities in Content Classes , 1993 .

[28]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research , 2000 .

[29]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[30]  Joseph R. Boyle,et al.  The Effects of Expert-Generated versus Student-Generated Cognitive Organizers on the Reading Comprehension of Students with Learning Disabilities. , 1997 .

[31]  Donna E. Alvermann,et al.  CHILDREN'S TRANSFER OF GRAPHIC ORGANIZER INSTRUCTION , 1986 .

[32]  Joseph R. Boyle.  The effects of a Cognitive Mapping Strategy on the Literal and Inferential Comprehension of Students with Mild Disabilities , 1996 .

[33]  R. Gersten,et al.  Direction-Setting Activities in Reading Comprehension: A Comparison of Two Approaches , 1986 .

[34]  More about increasing the quality of educational intervention research: A synthesis , 1994 .

[35]  D. Deshler,et al.  Strategy Mastery by At-Risk Students: Not a Simple Matter , 1993, The Elementary School Journal.

[36]  E. Balajthy,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF DISABLED READERS’ METACOMPREHENSION ABILITY THROUGH SUMMARIZATION TRAINING USING EXPOSITORY TEXT: RESULTS OF THREE STUDIES , 1990 .

[37]  Patricia L. Anders,et al.  The Effect of Semantic Feature Analysis on the Reading Comprehension of Learning Disabled Students. , 1983 .

[38]  Steven N. Austad,et al.  Knowledge acquisition and asymmetry between language comprehension and production: Dolphins and apes as general models for animals , 1996 .

[39]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Strategies for Teaching Students with Learning and Behavior Problems , 1988 .

[40]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Increasing the quality of educational intervention research , 1994 .

[41]  Edward J. Kameenui,et al.  Effects of Teacher-Constructed Pre- and Post-Graphic Organizer Instruction on Sixth-Grade Science Students’ Comprehension and Recall , 1988 .

[42]  G. E. Rice,et al.  NEED FOR EXPLANATIONS IN GRAPHIC ORGANIZER RESEARCH , 1994 .

[43]  Asha K. Jitendra,et al.  Advanced Story Map Instruction , 1999 .

[44]  Harry Singer,et al.  The Effect of Metacognitive Instruction in Outlining and Graphic Organizer Construction on Students' Comprehension in a Tenth-Grade World History Class , 1986 .

[45]  T. Lovitt,et al.  The Effectiveness of Textbook Adaptations in Life Science for High School Students with Learning Disabilities , 1988, Journal of learning disabilities.

[46]  C. Bos,et al.  The Effects of an Interactive Instructional Strategy for Enhancing Reading Comprehension and Content Area Learning for Students with Learning Disabilities , 1989, Journal of learning disabilities.

[47]  Diane Lapp,et al.  USING MULTIPLE TEXT FORMATS TO EXPLORE SCIENTIFIC PHENOMENA IN MIDDLE SCHOOL CLASSROOMS , 1995 .

[48]  Ralph L. Rosnow,et al.  Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis , 1984 .

[49]  Nicole Ugel,et al.  Instructional Strategies for Content-Area Reading Instruction , 1999 .

[50]  C. Bos,et al.  Effects of Interactive Vocabulary Instruction on the Vocabulary Learning and Reading Comprehension of Junior-High Learning Disabled Students , 1990 .

[51]  S. F. Witelson.  Developmental dyslexia: two right hemispheres and none left. , 1977, Science.