Clinical Assessment of Emission- and Segmentation-Based MR-Guided Attenuation Correction in Whole-Body Time-of-Flight PET/MR Imaging

The joint maximum-likelihood reconstruction of activity and attenuation (MLAA) for emission-based attenuation correction has regained attention since the advent of time-of-flight PET/MR imaging. Recently, we improved the performance of the MLAA algorithm using an MR imaging–constrained gaussian mixture model (GMM). In this study, we compare the performance of our proposed algorithm with standard 4-class MR-based attenuation correction (MRAC) implemented on commercial systems. Methods: Five head and neck 18F-FDG patients were scanned on PET/MR imaging and PET/CT scanners. Dixon fat and water MR images were registered to CT images. MRAC maps were derived by segmenting the MR images into 4 tissue classes and assigning predefined attenuation coefficients. For MLAA–GMM, MR images were segmented into known tissue classes, including fat, soft tissue, lung, background air, and an unknown MR low-intensity class encompassing cortical bones, air cavities, and metal artifacts. A coregistered bone probability map was also included in the unknown tissue class. Finally, the GMM prior was constrained over known tissue classes of attenuation maps using unimodal gaussians parameterized over a patient population. Results: The results showed that the MLAA–GMM algorithm outperformed the MRAC method by differentiating bones from air gaps and providing more accurate patient-specific attenuation coefficients of soft tissue and lungs. It was found that the MRAC and MLAA–GMM methods resulted in average standardized uptake value errors of –5.4% and –3.5% in the lungs, –7.4% and –5.0% in soft tissues/lesions, and –18.4% and –10.2% in bones, respectively. Conclusion: The proposed MLAA algorithm is promising for accurate derivation of attenuation maps on time-of-flight PET/MR systems.

[1]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Simultaneous maximum a posteriori reconstruction of attenuation and activity distributions from emission sinograms , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Guido Gerig,et al.  User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability , 2006, NeuroImage.

[3]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI: A Novel Approach Combining Pattern Recognition and Atlas Registration , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  J.M.M. Anderson,et al.  Concurrent Segmentation and Estimation of Transmission Images for Attenuation Correction in Positron Emission Tomography , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[5]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Tissue Classification as a Potential Approach for Attenuation Correction in Whole-Body PET/MRI: Evaluation with PET/CT Data , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  S. Vandenberghe,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI Using Ultrashort Echo Time Sequences , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  elastix: A Toolbox for Intensity-Based Medical Image Registration , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  R. Holen,et al.  The effect of errors in segmented attenuation maps on PET quantification. , 2011, Medical physics.

[9]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Design and performance evaluation of a whole-body Ingenuity TF PET–MRI system , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Til Aach,et al.  Simultaneous Reconstruction of Activity and Attenuation for PET/MR , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Simultaneous Reconstruction of Activity and Attenuation in Time-of-Flight PET , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  M. Defrise,et al.  Time-of-flight PET data determine the attenuation sinogram up to a constant , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  H. Quick,et al.  Magnetic Resonance–Based Attenuation Correction for PET/MR Hybrid Imaging Using Continuous Valued Attenuation Maps , 2013, Investigative radiology.

[14]  A. Alavi,et al.  PET/MR imaging: technical aspects and potential clinical applications. , 2013, Radiology.

[15]  Vladimir Panin,et al.  LSO background radiation as a transmission source using time of flight , 2013, 2013 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (2013 NSS/MIC).

[16]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  MR-Based Attenuation Correction Methods for Improved PET Quantification in Lesions Within Bone and Susceptibility Artifact Regions , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  B. Schölkopf,et al.  MR-Based PET attenuation correction for PET/MR imaging. , 2013, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[18]  Gaspar Delso,et al.  Investigation of 3D UTE MRI for lung PET attenuation correction , 2014 .

[19]  Vincent Keereman,et al.  Improvement of Attenuation Correction in Time-of-Flight PET/MR Imaging with a Positron-Emitting Source , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Clinical Assessment of MR-Guided 3-Class and 4-Class Attenuation Correction in PET/MR , 2015, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[21]  G. Delso,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of Zero-Echo-Time MR Imaging for the Segmentation of the Skull , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  Suleman Surti,et al.  Update on Time-of-Flight PET Imaging , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Joint Estimation of Activity and Attenuation in Whole-Body TOF PET/MRI Using Constrained Gaussian Mixture Models , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.