Leadership issues with multicultural crews on the international space station: lessons learned from Shuttle/Mir.

In isolated and confined environments, two important leadership roles have been identified: the task/instrumental role (which focuses on work goals and operational needs), and the supportive/expressive role (which focuses on morale goals and emotional needs). On the International Space Station, the mission commander should be familiar with both of these aspects of leadership. In previous research involving a 135-day Mir space station simulation in Moscow and a series of on-orbit Mir space station missions during the Shuttle/Mir program, both these leadership roles were studied. In new analyses of the Shuttle/Mir data, we found that for crewmembers, the supportive role of the commander (but not the task role) related positively with crew cohesion. For mission control personnel on the ground, both the task and supportive roles of their leader were related positively to mission control cohesion. The implications of these findings are discussed in terms of leadership on board the International Space Station.

[1]  Michael Harris Bond,et al.  Social Psychology Across Cultures , 1993 .

[2]  V. Gushin,et al.  Human interactions during Shuttle/Mir space missions. , 2001, Acta astronautica.

[3]  N Kanas,et al.  Social and cultural issues during Shuttle/Mir space missions. , 2000, Acta astronautica.

[4]  N Kanas,et al.  Psychological, psychiatric, and interpersonal aspects of long-duration space missions. , 1990, Journal of spacecraft and rockets.

[5]  V. Gushin,et al.  Asthenia—Does It Exist in Space? , 2001, Psychosomatic medicine.

[6]  N Kanas,et al.  Crewmember interactions during a Mir space station simulation. , 1996, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[7]  N Kanas,et al.  Human interactions in space: results from Shuttle/Mir. , 2001, Acta astronautica.

[8]  N Kanas,et al.  Crewmember and ground personnel interactions over time during Shuttle/Mir space missions. , 2001, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[9]  P. Nelson.  SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES AMONG LEADERS AND FOLLOWERS. , 1964, The Journal of social psychology.

[10]  Gunderson Ek,et al.  ADAPTATION OF SMALL GROUPS TO EXTREME ENVIRONMENTS. , 1963 .

[11]  Nick Kanas,et al.  Space Psychology and Psychiatry , 2003 .

[12]  Nick Kanas,et al.  Lessons learned from Shuttle/Mir: psychosocial countermeasures. , 2002, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[13]  N Kanas,et al.  Interpersonal and cultural issues involving crews and ground personnel during Shuttle/Mir space missions. , 2000, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[14]  Rudolf H. Moos,et al.  Group environment scale manual , 1986 .

[15]  R. Moos.  Work environment scale manual , 1986 .

[16]  N Kanas,et al.  Psychosocial issues in space: results from Shuttle/Mir. , 2001, Gravitational and space biology bulletin : publication of the American Society for Gravitational and Space Biology.