Combined use of LiDAR data and multispectral earth observation imagery for wetland habitat mapping

tAlthough wetlands play a key role in controlling flooding and nonpoint source pollution, sequesteringcarbon and providing an abundance of ecological services, the inventory and characterization of wetlandhabitats are most often limited to small areas. This explains why the understanding of their ecologicalfunctioning is still insufficient for a reliable functional assessment on areas larger than a few hectares.While LiDAR data and multispectral Earth Observation (EO) images are often used separately to mapwetland habitats, their combined use is currently being assessed for different habitat types. The aim ofthis study is to evaluate the combination of multispectral and multiseasonal imagery and LiDAR data toprecisely map the distribution of wetland habitats. The image classification was performed combiningan object-based approach and decision-tree modeling. Four multispectral images with high (SPOT-5)and very high spatial resolution (Quickbird, KOMPSAT-2, aerial photographs) were classified separately.Another classification was then applied integrating summer and winter multispectral image data andthree layers derived from LiDAR data: vegetation height, microtopography and intensity return. Thecomparison of classification results shows that some habitats are better identified on the winter image andothers on the summer image (overall accuracies = 58.5 and 57.6%). They also point out that classificationaccuracy is highly improved (overall accuracy = 86.5%) when combining LiDAR data and multispectralimages. Moreover, this study highlights the advantage of integrating vegetation height, microtopographyand intensity parameters in the classification process. This article demonstrates that information providedby the synergetic use of multispectral images and LiDAR data can help in wetland functional assessment© 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  H. Piégay,et al.  Spatial disaggregation and aggregation procedures for characterizing fluvial features at the network-scale: Application to the Rhône basin (France) , 2011 .

[2]  Leena Matikainen,et al.  An Object-Based Approach for Mapping Shrub and Tree Cover on Grassland Habitats by Use of LiDAR and CIR Orthoimages , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[3]  Brigitte Poulin,et al.  Wetland monitoring using classification trees and SPOT-5 seasonal time series , 2010 .

[4]  Ibon Galparsoro,et al.  Coastal and estuarine habitat mapping, using LIDAR height and intensity and multi-spectral imagery , 2008 .

[5]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Assessment of forest structure with airborne LiDAR and the effects of platform altitude , 2006 .

[6]  Stacy L. Ozesmi,et al.  Satellite remote sensing of wetlands , 2002, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[7]  G. Zalidis,et al.  Using Earth Observation to update a Natura 2000 habitat map for a wetland in Greece. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[8]  Yichun Xie,et al.  Remote sensing imagery in vegetation mapping: a review , 2008 .

[9]  Duccio Rocchini,et al.  ssessing floristic composition with multispectral sensors — A comparison based n monotemporal and multiseasonal field spectra , 2012 .

[10]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Evaluating error associated with lidar-derived DEM interpolation , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[11]  Tom Barker,et al.  The wetlands handbook , 2009 .

[12]  Jungho Im,et al.  Support vector machines in remote sensing: A review , 2011 .

[13]  Giulia Sofia,et al.  High‐resolution topography and anthropogenic feature extraction: testing geomorphometric parameters in floodplains , 2014 .

[14]  Angela Harris,et al.  A multi-scale remote sensing approach for monitoring northern peatland hydrology: present possibilities and future challenges. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[15]  J. Reitberger,et al.  3D segmentation of single trees exploiting full waveform LIDAR data , 2009 .

[16]  Peter Axelsson,et al.  Processing of laser scanner data-algorithms and applications , 1999 .

[17]  A. Hastings,et al.  Use of lidar to study changes associated with Spartina invasion in San Francisco bay marshes , 2006 .

[18]  Ruprecht Düll,et al.  Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa , 1992 .

[19]  Jungho Im,et al.  Synergistic use of QuickBird multispectral imagery and LIDAR data for object-based forest species classification , 2010 .

[20]  L. M. Cowardin,et al.  Remote sensing for identification and classification of wetland vegetation , 1974 .

[21]  Stuart R. Phinn,et al.  Mapping of riparian zone attributes using discrete return LiDAR, QuickBird and SPOT-5 imagery: Assessing accuracy and costs , 2010 .

[22]  M. Brinson The United States HGM (Hydrogeomorphic) Approach , 2009 .

[23]  D. Civco,et al.  Integrating multi-temporal spectral and structural information to map wetland vegetation in a lower Connecticut River tidal marsh , 2008 .

[24]  Geoffrey J. Hay,et al.  Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis (GEOBIA): A new name for a new discipline , 2008 .

[25]  Klaus Ecker,et al.  Contribution of multi-source remote sensing data to predictive mapping of plant-indicator gradients within Swiss mire habitats , 2010, Botanica Helvetica.

[26]  Richard F. Ambrose,et al.  A Comparison of Remote Sensing and Ground‐Based Methods for Monitoring Wetland Restoration Success , 2003 .

[27]  Laura Chasmer,et al.  Vegetation class dependent errors in lidar ground elevation and canopy height estimates in a boreal wetland environment , 2005 .

[28]  Guy S. Boggs,et al.  Assessment of SPOT 5 and QuickBird remotely sensed imagery for mapping tree cover in savannas , 2010, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[29]  Bernard Amiaud,et al.  Spatial patterns of soil salinities in old embanked marshlands in western France , 1998, Wetlands.

[30]  Hannes Feilhauer,et al.  On variable relations between vegetation patterns and canopy reflectance , 2011, Ecol. Informatics.

[31]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Object based image analysis for remote sensing , 2010 .

[32]  W. A. Wiersinga,et al.  The effects of drainage on groundwater quality and plant species distribution in stream valley meadows , 1988, Vegetatio.

[33]  A. Laliberte,et al.  Comparison of Nearest Neighbor and Rule-based Decision Tree Classification in an Object-oriented Environment , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[34]  C. Brodley,et al.  Decision tree classification of land cover from remotely sensed data , 1997 .

[35]  S. Aviron,et al.  Temporal variability of connectivity in agricultural landscapes: do farming activities help? , 2003, Landscape Ecology.

[36]  Sebastian Schmidtlein,et al.  Mapping the floristic continuum : Ordination space position estimated from imaging spectroscopy , 2007 .

[37]  Nicolas David,et al.  Large-scale classification of water areas using airborne topographic lidar data , 2013 .

[38]  Monique Bernier,et al.  Object-based classification of very high resolution panchromatic images for evaluating recent change in the structure of patterned peatlands , 2009 .

[39]  R. Lawrence,et al.  Mapping wetlands and riparian areas using Landsat ETM+ imagery and decision-tree-based models , 2006, Wetlands.

[40]  Jean Nabucet,et al.  Ditch network extraction and hydrogeomorphological characterization using LiDAR-derived DTM in wetlands. , 2015 .

[41]  E. Bork,et al.  Integrating LIDAR data and multispectral imagery for enhanced classification of rangeland vegetation: A meta analysis , 2007 .

[42]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Mapping specific habitats from remotely sensed imagery: Support vector machine and support vector data description based classification of coastal saltmarsh habitats , 2007, Ecol. Informatics.

[43]  Zuhal Akyurek,et al.  Identification and mapping of submerged plants in a shallow lake using Quickbird satellite data. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[44]  Sébastien Rapinel Contribution de la télédétection à l’évaluation des fonctions des zones humides : de l’observation à la modélisation prospective , 2012 .