URANS analysis of a broaching event in irregular quartering seas

Ship motions in a high sea state can have adverse effects on controllability, cause loss of stability, and ultimately compromise the survivability of the ship. In a broaching event, the ship losses control, naturally turning broadside to the waves, causing a dangerous situation and possibly capsizing. Classical approaches to study broaching rely on costly experimental programs and/or time-domain potential or system-based simulation codes. In this paper the ability of Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) to simulate a broaching event in irregular waves is demonstrated, and the extensive information available is used to analyze the broaching process. The demonstration nature of this paper is stressed, as opposed to a validated study. Unsteady RANS (URANS) provides a model based on first principles to capture phenomena such as coupling between sway, yaw, and roll, roll damping, effects of complex waves on righting arm, rudders partially out of the water, etc. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method uses a single-phase level-set approach to model the free surface, and dynamic overset grids to resolve large-amplitude motions. Before evaluating irregular seas two regular wave cases are demonstrated, one causing broaching and one causing stable surf riding. A sea state 8 is imposed following an irregular Bretschneider spectrum, and an autopilot was implemented to control heading and speed with two different gains for the heading controller. It is concluded that the autopilot causes the ship to be in an adverse dynamic condition at the beginning of the broaching process, and thus is partially responsible for the occurrence of the broaching event.

[1]  Philip A. Wilson,et al.  Manoeuvring and control of marine craft , 1992 .

[2]  Juntao Huang,et al.  Semi‐coupled air/water immersed boundary approach for curvilinear dynamic overset grids with application to ship hydrodynamics , 2008 .

[3]  Naoya Umeda,et al.  Broaching prediction in the light of an enhanced mathematical model, with higher-order terms taken into account , 2003 .

[4]  Kostas J. Spyrou Dynamic instability in quartering seas-Part II: Analysis of ship roll and capsize for broaching , 1996 .

[5]  David A. Boger,et al.  Prediction of Hydrodynamic Forces and Moments for Underwater Vehicles Using Overset Grids , 2006 .

[6]  F. Stern,et al.  Ship motions using single-phase level set with dynamic overset grids , 2007 .

[7]  V. C. Patel,et al.  A viscous-flow approach to the computation of propeller-hull interaction , 1988 .

[8]  K. J. Spyrou,et al.  Dynamic Instability in Quartering Seas: The Behavior of a Ship During Broaching , 1996 .

[9]  Kevin A. McTaggart,et al.  Random Waves and Capsize Probability Based on Large Amplitude Motion Analysis , 2002 .

[10]  Frederick Stern,et al.  An unsteady single‐phase level set method for viscous free surface flows , 2007 .

[11]  F. Menter Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[12]  A. D. Liut Nonlinear Green Water Effects on Ship Motions and Structural Loads , 2002 .

[13]  Kj Spyrou Dynamic Instability in Quartering Seas - Part III; Nonlinear Effects on Periodic Motions , 1997 .

[14]  Naoya Umeda,et al.  Importance of several nonlinear factors on broaching prediction , 2004 .

[15]  Ralph Noack,et al.  SUGGAR: A General Capability for Moving Body Overset Grid Assembly , 2005 .