Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity

Human population size and growth rate are often considered important drivers of biodiversity loss, whereas household dynamics are usually neglected. Aggregate demographic statistics may mask substantial changes in the size and number of households, and their effects on biodiversity. Household dynamics influence per capita consumption and thus biodiversity through, for example, consumption of wood for fuel, habitat alteration for home building and associated activities, and greenhouse gas emissions. Here we report that growth in household numbers globally, and particularly in countries with biodiversity hotspots (areas rich in endemic species and threatened by human activities), was more rapid than aggregate population growth between 1985 and 2000. Even when population size declined, the number of households increased substantially. Had the average household size (that is, the number of occupants) remained static, there would have been 155 million fewer households in hotspot countries in 2000. Reduction in average household size alone will add a projected 233 million additional households to hotspot countries during the period 2000–15. Rapid increase in household numbers, often manifested as urban sprawl, and resultant higher per capita resource consumption in smaller households pose serious challenges to biodiversity conservation.

[1]  E. Kitagawa,et al.  Components of a Difference Between Two Rates , 1955 .

[2]  E. Deevey,et al.  The human population. , 1960, Scientific American.

[3]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Human population and the global environment. , 1974, American scientist.

[4]  J. Pauw,et al.  Determinants of domestic water use in rural Nicaragua. , 1990, The Journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[5]  Qiang Liu,et al.  Rural household energy use in China , 1992 .

[6]  P. Eagles,et al.  Effects of Residential Development on Forest-Dwelling Neotropical Migrant Songbirds , 1995 .

[7]  Wolfgang Lutz,et al.  Population, Households, and CO2 Emissions , 1995 .

[8]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  The Future of Biodiversity , 1995, Science.

[9]  H. M. Yousif Population, biomass and the environment in central Sudan , 1995 .

[10]  W. Zipperer,et al.  Effects of wildland development on forest bird communities , 1995 .

[11]  Bircan Erbas,et al.  Economies of scale in energy use in adult-only households , 1995 .

[12]  G. Daily Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. , 1998 .

[13]  T. Gardner-Outlaw,et al.  Forest Futures: Population, Consumption and Wood Resources , 1999 .

[14]  Ken Thompson,et al.  Human Population Density and Prediction of Local Plant Extinction in Britain , 1999 .

[15]  R. Engelman,et al.  Human population in the biodiversity hotspots , 2000, Nature.

[16]  R. Loomes,et al.  Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems , 2000 .

[17]  R. Engelman,et al.  Nature's Place: Human Population and the Future of Biological Diversity , 2000 .

[18]  C. Griffin,et al.  Housing developments in rural New England: effects on forest birds , 2000 .

[19]  R. Mittermeier,et al.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities , 2000, Nature.

[20]  Kevin Kinsella,et al.  An aging world: 2001 , 2001 .

[21]  M. Lenzen,et al.  A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia , 2001 .

[22]  Un-Habitat Cities in a Globalizing World: Global Report on Human Settlements , 2001 .

[23]  Li An,et al.  Simulating demographic and socioeconomic processes on household level and implications for giant panda habitats , 2001 .

[24]  J. Liu,et al.  Ecological Degradation in Protected Areas: The Case of Wolong Nature Reserve for Giant Pandas , 2001, Science.

[25]  Gregor Dürrenberger,et al.  Household energy consumption in Switzerland , 2001 .

[26]  Christopher A. Lepczyk,et al.  Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Endangered Species Hotspots in the United States , 2001 .

[27]  J. Bongaarts The End of the Fertility Transition in the Developed World , 2002 .