An interactive approach to identify the best compromise solution for two objective shortest path problems

Abstract In recent years there has been a growing interest in multiobjective path problems. Although efficient algorithms exist for solving single objective shortest path problems, the same is not true for generating the noninferior solution set for multiobjective problems, as the number of noninferior solutions may grow exponentially with the number of nodes. Hansen (1980) [Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 177 (Edited by M. Beckmann and H.P. Kunzi),pp. 109–127. Springer, Berlin], Climaco and Martins (1982) [Eur. J. Opl Res. 11, 399–404], Martins (1984) [Eur. J. Opl. Res. 16, 236–245], and Henig (1985) [Eur. J. Opl. Res. 25, 281–291] present exact algorithms for generating the entire noninferior solution set for a two objective shortest path problem. All of the above authors acknowledge the computational complexity of the problem and consequently, with the exception of Martins (1984), propose algorithms to generate an approximation of the noninferior solution set. None of these authors, however, recommend direct interaction with the decision makers. In this article, we propose an interactive method to generate an approximation of the noninferior solution set for two objective shortest path problems. The goal of this approach is to assist the decision maker in selecting the preferred or best compromise solution from among the noninferior solutions.

[1]  Arthur Warburton,et al.  Approximation of Pareto Optima in Multiple-Objective, Shortest-Path Problems , 1987, Oper. Res..

[2]  Jared L. Cohon,et al.  THE MEDIAN SHORTEST PATH PROBLEM : A MULTIOBJECTIVE APPROACH TO ANALYZE COST VS. ACCESSIBILITY IN THE DESIGN OF TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS , 1987 .

[3]  M. I. Henig The shortest path problem with two objective functions , 1986 .

[4]  E. Martins On a multicriteria shortest path problem , 1984 .

[5]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1978 .

[6]  E. Martins,et al.  A bicriterion shortest path algorithm , 1982 .

[7]  Narsingh Deo,et al.  Shortest-path algorithms: Taxonomy and annotation , 1984, Networks.

[8]  Toshihide Ibaraki,et al.  An efficient algorithm for K shortest simple paths , 1982, Networks.

[9]  Gabriel Y. Handler,et al.  A dual algorithm for the constrained shortest path problem , 1980, Networks.

[10]  Thomas L. Magnanti,et al.  Deterministic network optimization: A bibliography , 1977, Networks.

[11]  David A. Schilling,et al.  STRATEGIC FACILITY PLANNING: THE ANALYSIS OF OPTIONS , 1982 .

[12]  Randolph W. Hall What's So Scientific about MS/OR? , 1985 .

[13]  Stephen J. Garland,et al.  Algorithm 97: Shortest path , 1962, Commun. ACM.

[14]  J. Current,et al.  The Minimum‐Covering/Shortest‐Path Problem* , 1988 .

[15]  D. J. White,et al.  The set of efficient solutions for multiple objective shortest path problems , 1982, Comput. Oper. Res..

[16]  Hokey Min,et al.  Multiobjective design of transportation networks: taxonomy and annotation , 1986 .

[17]  J. Cohon,et al.  Generating multiobjective trade-offs: an algorithm for bicriterion problems , 1979 .

[18]  Lawrence Bodin,et al.  Current and future research directions in network optimization , 1981, Comput. Oper. Res..

[19]  Pierre Hansen,et al.  Bicriterion Path Problems , 1980 .

[20]  S. Zionts,et al.  An Interactive Programming Method for Solving the Multiple Criteria Problem , 1976 .