Characterization of monoclonal antibodies that recognize canine CD34.

Using a polyclonal antiserum against canine CD34, we previously found that CD34 is expressed on canine bone marrow progenitor cells in a manner analogous to that found in humans. To further characterize CD34+ cells and to facilitate preclinical canine stem cell transplant studies, monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) were raised to CD34. A panel of 10 MoAbs was generated that reacted with recombinant CD34 and with CD34+ cell lines and failed to react with CD34- cell lines. Binding properties of five purified MoAbs were determined by BIAcore analysis and flow cytometric staining, and several MoAbs showed high affinity for CD34. Two antibodies, 1H6 and 2E9, were further characterized, and in flow cytometry studies typically 1% to 3% of stained bone marrow cells were CD34+. Purified CD34+ bone marrow cells were 1.8- to 55-fold enriched for colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage and for long-term culture initiating cells as compared with bone marrow mononuclear cells, whereas CD34- cells were depleted of progenitors. Three autologous transplants were performed with CD34+ cell fractions enriched by immunomagnetic separation. After marrow ablative total body irradiation (920 cGy), prompt hematopoietic recovery was seen with transplanted cell doses of </=1.1 x 10(7) /kg that were 29% to 70% CD34+. Engraftment kinetics were similar to those of dogs previously transplanted with approximately 10- to 100-fold more unmodified autologous marrow cells. This suggests that CD34+ is a marker not only of canine bone marrow progenitors but also for cells with radioprotective or marrow repopulating function in vivo. MoAbs to CD34 will be valuable for future studies of canine hematopoiesis and preclinical studies concerning stem cell transplantation, gene therapy, and ex vivo progenitor cell expansion.

[1]  R. Storb,et al.  Transplantation of allogeneic CD34+ peripheral blood stem cells in patients with advanced hematologic malignancy. , 1996, Blood.

[2]  Stephen,et al.  Primitive hematopoietic cells in murine bone marrow express the CD34 antigen. , 1996, Blood.

[3]  A. Murray,et al.  Association of Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Component XMAD2 with Unattached Kinetochores , 1996, Science.

[4]  R. Storb,et al.  Canine CD34: cloning of the cDNA and evaluation of an antiserum to recombinant protein. , 1996, Blood.

[5]  C. Civin,et al.  Highly purified CD34-positive cells reconstitute hematopoiesis. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  Hiromitsu Nakauchi,et al.  Long-Term Lymphohematopoietic Reconstitution by a Single CD34-Low/Negative Hematopoietic Stem Cell , 1996, Science.

[7]  B. Sandmaier,et al.  An antibody to CD44 enhances hematopoiesis in long-term marrow cultures. , 1996, Experimental hematology.

[8]  R. Jacobs,et al.  Combined transplantation of allogeneic bone marrow and CD34+ blood cells. , 1995, Blood.

[9]  A. Lichtenstein,et al.  Transplantation of CD34+ peripheral blood progenitor cells after high-dose chemotherapy for patients with advanced multiple myeloma. , 1995, Blood.

[10]  J. Reems,et al.  Cell cycle and functional differences between CD34+/CD38hi and CD34+/38lo human marrow cells after in vitro cytokine exposure. , 1995, Blood.

[11]  L. Lasky,et al.  Global vascular expression of murine CD34, a sialomucin-like endothelial ligand for L-selectin , 1994 .

[12]  P. Linsley,et al.  CTLA4Ig treatment ameliorates the lethality of murine graft-versus-host disease across major histocompatibility complex barriers. , 1994, Transplantation.

[13]  S. Heimfeld,et al.  Positively selected autologous blood CD34+ cells and unseparated peripheral blood progenitor cells mediate identical hematopoietic engraftment after high-dose VP16, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and epirubicin , 1994 .

[14]  I. Brooks,et al.  Determination of rate and equilibrium binding constants for macromolecular interactions using surface plasmon resonance: use of nonlinear least squares analysis methods. , 1993, Analytical biochemistry.

[15]  H. Deeg,et al.  Marrow toxicity of fractionated vs. single dose total body irradiation is identical in a canine model. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  P. Linsley,et al.  Immunosuppression in vivo by a soluble form of the CTLA-4 T cell activation molecule. , 1992, Science.

[17]  R. Karlsson,et al.  Kinetic analysis of monoclonal antibody-antigen interactions with a new biosensor based analytical system. , 1991, Journal of immunological methods.

[18]  S. Loefas,et al.  Immobilization of proteins to a carboxymethyldextran-modified gold surface for biospecific interaction analysis in surface plasmon resonance sensors. , 1991, Analytical biochemistry.

[19]  R. Andrews,et al.  Engraftment after infusion of CD34+ marrow cells in patients with breast cancer or neuroblastoma. , 1991, Blood.

[20]  I. Bernstein,et al.  Antigen CD34+ marrow cells engraft lethally irradiated baboons. , 1988, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[21]  H. Deeg,et al.  FACILITATION OF ENGRAFTMENT OF DLA‐NONIDENTICAL MARROW BY TREATMENT OF RECIPIENTS WITH MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY DIRECTED AGAINST MARROW CELLS SURVIVING RADIATION , 1987, Transplantation.

[22]  W. Carter,et al.  Identification of multiple cell adhesion receptors for collagen and fibronectin in human fibrosarcoma cells possessing unique alpha and common beta subunits , 1987, The Journal of cell biology.

[23]  I. Bernstein,et al.  Monoclonal antibody 12-8 recognizes a 115-kd molecule present on both unipotent and multipotent hematopoietic colony-forming cells and their precursors , 1986 .

[24]  R. Storb,et al.  Graft‐versus‐Host Disease in Dog and Man: The Seattle Experience , 1985, Immunological reviews.

[25]  I. Bernstein,et al.  Influence of antibody isotype on passive serotherapy of lymphoma. , 1985, Journal of immunology.

[26]  M. Fackler,et al.  Antigenic analysis of hematopoiesis. III. A hematopoietic progenitor cell surface antigen defined by a monoclonal antibody raised against KG-1a cells. , 1984, Journal of immunology.

[27]  L. Coulombel,et al.  Enzymatic treatment of long-term human marrow cultures reveals the preferential location of primitive hemopoietic progenitors in the adherent layer. , 1983, Blood.

[28]  H. Kaplan,et al.  Long-term culture of human bone marrow cells. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  B. Netzel,et al.  Fractionated total body irradiation and autologous bone marrow transplantation in dogs: hemopoietic recovery after various marrow cell doses. , 1980, Experimental hematology.

[30]  F. Appelbaum,et al.  Study of cell dose and storage time on engraftment of cryopreserved autologous bone marrow in a canine model. , 1978, Transplantation.

[31]  R. Storb,et al.  Studies on the mechanism of stable graft-host tolerance in canine and human radiation chimeras. , 1976, Transplantation proceedings.

[32]  R. Storb,et al.  MARROW GRAFTS BETWEEN DL‐A‐MATCHED CANINE LITTERMATES , 1973, Transplantation.

[33]  E. Shpall,et al.  Transplantation of enriched CD34-positive autologous marrow into breast cancer patients following high-dose chemotherapy: influence of CD34-positive peripheral-blood progenitors and growth factors on engraftment. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  G. Cain,et al.  Establishment and partial characterization of a radiation-induced canine monocytic leukemic cell line (RK9ML-1). , 1989, Leukemia research.

[35]  M. Greaves,et al.  Identification of a membrane glycoprotein associated with haemopoietic progenitor cells. , 1985, Leukemia research.