On the sources of technological change: What do the models assume

Abstract It is widely acknowledged that technological change can substantially reduce the costs of stabilizing atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases. This paper discusses the sources of technological change and the representations of these sources in formal models of energy and the environment. The paper distinguishes between three major sources of technological change–R&D, learning-by-doing and spillovers–and introduces a conceptual framework for linking modeling approaches to assumptions about these real-world sources. A selective review of modeling approaches, including those employing exogenous technological change, suggests that most formal models have meaningful real-world interpretations that focus on a subset of possible sources of technological change while downplaying the roles of others.

[1]  John P. Weyant,et al.  On the sources of technological change: Assessing the evidence , 2006 .

[2]  L. Schrattenholzer,et al.  Endogenous technological change in climate change modelling , 1999 .

[3]  E. Helpman.  General purpose technologies and economic growth , 1998 .

[4]  Stephen H. Schneider,et al.  Induced technological change and the attractiveness of CO2 abatement policies , 1999 .

[5]  Austan Goolsbee,et al.  Does Government R&D Policy Mainly Benefit Scientists and Engineers? , 1998 .

[6]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  Modeling Induced Innovation in Climate Change Policy , 2002 .

[7]  William W. Alberts,et al.  The Experience Curve Doctrine Reconsidered , 1989 .

[8]  Tirso Leonardo Barreto Gómez,et al.  Technological Learning in Energy Optimisation Models and Deployment of Emerging Technologies , 2001 .

[9]  Andrii Gritsevskyi,et al.  Modeling uncertainty of induced technological change , 2000 .

[10]  P. Romer.  Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[11]  D. B. Montgomery,et al.  Diagnosing the Experience Curve , 1983 .

[12]  L. Goulder,et al.  Optimal Co2 Abatement in the Presence of Induced Technological Change , 1998 .

[13]  Z. Griliches.  The Search for R&D Spillovers , 1991 .

[14]  Socrates Kypreos,et al.  Incorporating different endogenous learning formulations in MERGE , 2003 .

[15]  I. Wing,et al.  Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change Induced Technical Change and the Cost of Climate Policy , 2022 .

[16]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  Learning Curve Analysis for Energy Technologies: Theoretical and Econometric Issues , 2003 .

[17]  S. Abraham.  The Bush Administration's Approach to Climate Change , 2004, Science.

[18]  David Popp,et al.  Entice: Endogenous Technological Change in the Dice Model of Global Warming , 2003 .

[19]  A. Jaffe.  Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[20]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[21]  Marzio Galeotti,et al.  Endogenous Induced Technical Change and the Costs of Kyoto , 2001 .

[22]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  Experiments with a methodology to model the role of RD first results , 2004 .

[23]  D. E. Stokes.  Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation , 1997 .

[24]  S. Messner,et al.  Endogenized technological learning in an energy systems model , 1997 .