Evaluating the Impact of New Technology on Human-Machine Cooperation

New technology is changing the face of complex dynamic systems in a wide variety of applications. Given the magnitude, pace and costs of this technological change, errors in the design of human-machine systems need to be detected early in the system development process. This is especially true for high risk domains where design errors can have severe consequences on human-machine system performance. If problems are discovered after a system has been put in service or even late in the design process, the degrees of freedom for modification of the design may be severely reduced due to the costs and commitment involved. In addition, if evidence of possible deficiencies in the human-machine ensemble appears late in the development process, there may be a variety of pressures operating that encourage one to interpret evidence of fundamental design problems as only indicating the usual problems associated with the introduction of any new system.

[1]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[2]  David Woods,et al.  Human interaction with intelligent systems: trends, problems and new directions , 1991, Conference Proceedings 1991 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[3]  David Woods,et al.  HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION IN CONTEXT: PHYSICIAN INTERACTION WITH AUTOMATED INTRAVENOUS CONTROLLERS IN THE HEART ROOM , 1992 .

[4]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction , 1988 .

[5]  Kevin B. Bennett,et al.  Human Interaction with an "Intelligent" Machine , 1987, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[6]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  The technology of team navigation , 1990 .

[7]  David Woods,et al.  The Natural History of Introducing New Information Technology into a High-Risk Environment , 1990 .

[8]  E M Roth,et al.  Cognitive simulation as a tool for cognitive task analysis. , 1992, Ergonomics.

[9]  Allen Newell,et al.  The Knowledge Level , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[10]  Paul A. Kolers,et al.  Mental Manipulation of Arithmetic Symbols. , 1982 .

[11]  Emilie M. Roth,et al.  Cognitive Task Analysis: An Approach to Knowledge Acquisition for Intelligent System Design , 1989 .

[12]  D. Norman The psychology of everyday things , 1990 .

[13]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  Pilot Interaction With Cockpit Automation: Operational Experiences With the Flight Management System , 1992 .

[14]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  Mode Error in Supervisory Control of Automated Systems , 1992 .

[15]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work , 1990 .

[16]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Designing for error , 1987 .

[17]  David Woods,et al.  The Sophistry of Guidelines: Revisiting Recipes for Color Use in Human-Computer Interface Design , 1992 .

[18]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  Pilot Interaction With Cockpit Automation II: An Experimental Study of Pilots’ Model and Awareness of the Flight Management System , 1994 .

[19]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Cognitive Systems Engineering: New Wine in New Bottles , 1983, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[20]  G. Klein,et al.  Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods , 1993 .