Towards Addressing Unintended Environmental Consequences: A Planning Framework

Efforts to decouple environmental impacts and resource consumption have been confounded by interactions and feedback between technical-economic, environmental and social aspects not considered prior to implementing improvement actions. This paper presents a planning framework that connects material flows and the socio-economic drivers that result in changes in these flows, in order to reduce conflicts between localized gains and global losses. The framework emphasizes the need for (i) having different settings of system boundaries (broader and narrower), (ii) explicitly accounting for causal relationships and feedback loops and (iii) identifying responsibilities between stakeholders (e.g. producers, consumers, collectors, recyclers, policy makers). Application of the framework is exemplified using the case of the global mobile phone product system. 'Product design and development' and 'Retailers and users as part of a collection system' were identified as central intervention points for implementing improvement strategies that included designing for longer life, designing for recycling and improving collection, designing for limiting phone hibernation time and internalizing external costs.

[1]  Kal Raustiala States, NGOs, and International Environmental Institutions , 1997 .

[2]  Jeffrey B. Dahmus,et al.  Can Efficiency Improvements Reduce Resource Consumption? , 2014 .

[3]  Jessica Lagerstedt,et al.  EcoDesign and The Ten Golden Rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development , 2006 .

[4]  Leo Baas,et al.  Cleaner Production and Industrial Ecology: A Dire Need for 21st Century Manufacturing , 2008 .

[5]  F. Figge,et al.  Sufficiency or efficiency to achieve lower resource consumption and emissions? The role of the rebound effect , 2014 .

[6]  John R. Ehrenfeld,et al.  Eco‐efficiency: Philosophy, Theory, and Tools , 2005 .

[7]  Arnold Tukker,et al.  Identifying Priorities for Environmental Product Policy , 2006 .

[8]  Andrew Dobson,et al.  Environmental citizenship: towards sustainable development , 2007 .

[9]  T. Hellström,et al.  Dimensions of environmentally sustainable innovation: the structure of eco‐innovation concepts , 2007 .

[10]  Eeva-Lotta Apajalahti,et al.  Emergent eco-efficiency paradigm in corporate environment management , 2009 .

[11]  L. Berchicci,et al.  Bridging environmental issues with new product development , 2005 .

[12]  N. V. Nes,et al.  Product lifetime optimization: a challenging strategy towards more sustainable consumption patterns , 2006 .

[13]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[14]  Peter Dobers,et al.  Design, lifestyles and sustainability. Aesthetic consumption in a world of abundance , 2005 .

[15]  P. Gleick,et al.  Systems integration for global sustainability , 2015, Science.

[16]  D. Soron,et al.  Sustainability, self‐identity and the sociology of consumption , 2010 .

[17]  J. Guiltinan,et al.  Creative Destruction and Destructive Creations: Environmental Ethics and Planned Obsolescence , 2009 .

[18]  Tracy Bhamra,et al.  Design for Sustainable Behaviour: Using Products to Change Consumer Behaviour , 2011 .

[19]  Geoff Lamberton,et al.  Sustainable sufficiency – an internally consistent version of sustainability , 2005 .

[20]  T. Prior,et al.  Resource depletion, peak minerals and the implications for sustainable resource management , 2012 .

[21]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  The “Bad Labor” Footprint: Quantifying the Social Impacts of Globalization , 2014 .

[22]  I D Williams,et al.  Mobile phone collection, reuse and recycling in the UK. , 2011, Waste management.

[23]  Martin Reynolds,et al.  Introducing Systems Approaches , 2020, Systems Approaches to Making Change: A Practical Guide.

[24]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[25]  J. Sterman Sustaining Sustainability: Creating a Systems Science in a Fragmented Academy and Polarized World , 2012 .

[26]  Martina Keitsch Sustainable Design: A Brief Appraisal of its Main Concepts , 2012 .

[27]  Joachim H. Spangenberg,et al.  Design for Sustainability (DfS): the interface of sustainable production and consumption , 2010 .

[28]  D. Weir Management teaching, the spiritual dimension and the acceptance of the Islamic other , 2012 .

[29]  A. Ohanyan Policy Wars for Peace: Network Model of NGO Behavior , 2009 .

[30]  Richard Wood,et al.  Labor Embodied in Trade , 2015 .

[31]  R. DeFries,et al.  Framing Sustainability in a Telecoupled World , 2013, Ecology and Society.

[32]  Paul Hekkert,et al.  Design for Socially Responsible Behavior: A Classification of Influence Based on Intended User Experience , 2011, Design Issues.

[33]  Rajib Sinha,et al.  Unintended Environmental Consequences of Improvement Actions: A Qualitative Analysis of Systems' Structure and Behavior , 2016 .

[34]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[35]  G. O’Brien,et al.  Sustainable development: mapping different approaches , 2005 .

[36]  Kaarle Kupiainen,et al.  Simultaneously Mitigating Near-Term Climate Change and Improving Human Health and Food Security , 2012, Science.

[37]  John R. Ehrenfeld,et al.  Would Industrial Ecology Exist without Sustainability in the Background? , 2007 .

[38]  William R. Sheate,et al.  Functional and systems aspects of the sustainable product and service development approach for industry , 2006 .

[39]  Glenn Rothberg,et al.  Beyond mainstream management: a breakthrough passage construct , 2005 .

[40]  Gui-Ling Wang,et al.  Integrating eco-efficiency and eco-effectiveness into the design of sustainable industrial systems in China , 2011 .

[41]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Humanity’s unsustainable environmental footprint , 2014, Science.

[42]  Phillip A. Goggin,et al.  The Dominant Stances on Ecodesign: A Critique , 2001, Design Issues.

[43]  Björn Frostell,et al.  Group Model-Building to identify potential sources of environmental impacts outside the scope of LCA studies , 2014 .

[44]  B. Frostell,et al.  Progress and challenges to the global waste management system , 2014, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.