Key variables for the identification of soil management classes in the aeolian landscapes of north–west Europe

Abstract At present, spatially very detailed data sets can be obtained about soil, landscape and crop variability. However, there is a need to select independent key properties to identify management classes needed for precise land management. In a previous study performed in the European loess belt, topsoil pH, apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) and elevation were identified as key properties. In this study we enlarged the number of soil properties by including gamma ray measurements and employed a similar methodology to a field in the sand belt of northern Europe. Based on a principal component analysis we identified the same three variables as key properties. This was surprising given the big differences in landscape topology and pedogenesis between the loess and sand areas. These three key variables were used to delineate management classes using a fuzzy k-means with extragrade classification procedure. This classification was evaluated by mapping the wheat grain yield in the year 2006. A multiple regression model could be constructed that predicted yield from ECa and elevation well (Radj2 = 0.88). To analyse the influence of ECa on crop yield in depth a boundary line analysis was conducted. The boundary line could be modelled with an excellent Radj2 of 0.98. It was concluded that ECa, elevation and pH are generic key variables for the delineation of management classes of the aeolian landscapes of north–west Europe. Given its integral nature and strong relationship with crop performances, the authors plea to upgrade ECa from a “secondary” (proxy) source of information to a “primary” variable which can be used directly as a basis for detailed soil mapping of the bulk soil.

[1]  Kenneth A. Sudduth,et al.  Estimating depths to claypans using electromagnetic induction methods , 1994 .

[2]  D. Mulla,et al.  Key processes and properties for site-specific soil and crop management. , 1997 .

[3]  D. Vandenberghe,et al.  A medieval settlement caught in the sand: optical dating of sand-drifting at Pulle (N Belgium) , 2010 .

[4]  Dagmar Haase,et al.  Loess in Europe—its spatial distribution based on a European Loess Map, scale 1:2,500,000 , 2007 .

[5]  D. Corwin,et al.  Apparent soil electrical conductivity measurements in agriculture , 2005 .

[6]  Brigitte Charnomordic,et al.  A segmentation algorithm for the delineation of agricultural management zones , 2010 .

[7]  Viacheslav I. Adamchuk,et al.  Evaluation of an on-the-go technology for soil pH mapping , 2007, Precision Agriculture.

[8]  A. Walkley,et al.  AN EXAMINATION OF THE DEGTJAREFF METHOD FOR DETERMINING SOIL ORGANIC MATTER, AND A PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF THE CHROMIC ACID TITRATION METHOD , 1934 .

[9]  L. Cockx,et al.  A pedotransfer function to evaluate the soil profile textural heterogeneity using proximally sensed apparent electrical conductivity , 2009 .

[10]  P. Jungerius,et al.  Contribution of laser altimetry images to the geomorphology of the Late Holocene inland drift sands of the European Sand Belt , 2010 .

[11]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms , 1981, Advanced Applications in Pattern Recognition.

[12]  F. J. Pierce,et al.  Soil Management for Sustainability , 1992 .

[13]  Josse De Baerdemaeker,et al.  Key soil and topographic properties to delineate potential management classes for precision agriculture in the European loess area , 2008 .

[14]  Timothy C. Coburn,et al.  Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation , 2000, Technometrics.

[15]  Jan M. H. Hendrickx,et al.  Noninvasive Soil Water Content Measurement Using Electromagnetic Induction , 1995 .

[16]  R. V. Rossel,et al.  Visible and near infrared spectroscopy in soil science , 2010 .

[17]  Kenneth A. Sudduth,et al.  Electromagnetic Induction Sensing as an Indicator of Productivity on Claypan soils , 2015 .

[18]  A. McBratney,et al.  A continuum approach to soil classification by modified fuzzy k‐means with extragrades , 1992 .

[19]  J. M. Silva,et al.  Delineation of management zones using mobile measurements of soil apparent electrical conductivity and multivariate geostatistical techniques , 2010 .

[20]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  An overview of pedometric techniques for use in soil survey , 2000 .

[21]  Matthias Rothmund,et al.  Precision agriculture on grassland : Applications, perspectives and constraints , 2008 .

[22]  David J. Mulla Using geostatistics and GIS to manage spatial patterns in soil fertility , 1991 .

[23]  F. Egmond,et al.  Gamma Ray Sensor for Topsoil Mapping: The Mole , 2010 .

[24]  J. D. Mcneill Electromagnetic Terrain Conduc-tivity Measurement at Low Induction Numbers , 1980 .

[25]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  Application of fuzzy sets to climatic classification , 1985 .

[26]  Kenneth A. Sudduth,et al.  Soil Electrical Conductivity as a Crop Productivity Measure for Claypan Soils , 1999 .

[27]  Alfred E. Hartemink,et al.  Soil Atlas of Europe , 2006 .

[28]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  Soil pattern recognition with fuzzy-c-means : application to classification and soil-landform interrelationships , 1992 .

[29]  T. M. Shatar,et al.  Boundary-line analysis of field-scale yield response to soil properties , 2004, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[30]  D. Jaynes,et al.  Soil type and crop yield determination from ground conductivity surveys. , 1993 .