A Comparison of Rating Formats After Corrections for Attenuation
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] H. Weiss,et al. Effects of Standard Extremity on Mixed Standard Scale Performance Ratings. , 1984 .
[2] Nambury S. Raju,et al. A Comparison of Five Methods for Combining Multiple Criteria into a Single Composite , 1982 .
[3] Gary P. Latham,et al. EFFECTS OF TRAINING AND RATING SCALES ON RATING ERRORS , 1982 .
[4] W. Sauser,et al. Shortcut Methods for Deriving Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales , 1981 .
[5] H. John Bernardin,et al. A clarification of some issues regarding the development and use of behaviorally anchored ratings scales (BARS). , 1981 .
[6] A. R. Bass,et al. A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF STUDIES COMPARING BEHAVIORALLY ANCHORED RATING SCALES (BARS) AND OTHER RATING FORMATS , 1981 .
[7] John E. Hunter,et al. Halo in a multidimensional forced-choice performance evaluation scale. , 1980 .
[8] Sheldon Zedeck,et al. EXPECTATIONS OF BEHAVIORALLY ANCHORED RATING SCALES , 1980 .
[9] H. J. Bernardin,et al. A Critical Assessment of Mixed Standard Rating Scales. , 1980 .
[10] T. Dickinson,et al. A comparison of the behaviorally anchored rating and mixed standard scale formats. , 1980 .
[11] W. Borman,et al. Format and training effects on rating accuracy and rater errors , 1979 .
[12] H. G. Osburn,et al. Behaviorally based rating scales: Effects of specific anchors and disguised scale continua. , 1977 .
[13] H. John Bernardin,et al. Behavioral expectation scales versus summated scales: A fairer comparison. , 1977 .
[14] Gary P. Latham,et al. BEHAVIORAL OBSERVATION SCALES FOR PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PURPOSES , 1977 .
[15] Robert F. Burnaska,et al. An empirical comparison of the relative effects of rater response biases on three rating scale formats. , 1974 .
[16] Richard D. Arvey,et al. A Guttman approach to the development of behaviorally based rating scales for systems analysts and programmer/analysts. , 1974 .
[17] Marvin D. Dunnette,et al. The development and evaluation of behaviorally based rating scales , 1973 .
[18] Edwin E. Ghiselli,et al. THE MIXED STANDARD SCALE: A NEW RATING SYSTEM , 1972 .
[19] M. R. Novick,et al. Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. , 1971 .
[20] C. Bartlett,et al. Effect of instructional conditions in producing leniency on two types of rating scales. , 1969 .
[21] J. Lepkowski,et al. Development of a forced-choice rating scale for engineer evaluation. , 1963 .
[22] James R. Berkshire,et al. Forced-Choice Performance Rating—A Methodological Study* , 1953 .
[23] A. W. Bendig. The reliability of self-ratings as a function of the amount of verbal anchoring and of the number of categories on the scale. , 1953 .
[24] L. Mcquitty,et al. A New Application of Forced‐Choice Ratings* , 1950 .
[25] H. John Bernardin,et al. Performance appraisal : assessing human behavior at work , 1984 .
[26] C. Bartlett,et al. What's the difference between valid and invalid halo? Forced-choice measurement without forcing a choice. , 1983 .
[27] Raymond Lee,et al. Multitrait-multimethod-multirater analysis of performance ratings for law enforcement personnel. , 1981 .
[28] Zur Shapira,et al. New issues in the use of behaviorally anchored rating scales: Level of analysis, the effects of incident frequency, and external validation. , 1980 .
[29] D. W. Zimmerman,et al. Is classical test theory "robust" under violation of the assumption of uncorrelated errors? , 1980 .
[30] J. Cotton,et al. The general applicability of a scale for rating research productivity. , 1960 .