Information-Sharing in Academia and the Industry: A Comparative Study

This paper investigates how scientists decide whether to share information with their colleagues or not. Detailed data on the decisions of 1,694 bio-scientists allow to detect similarities and differences between academia-based and industry-based scientists. Arguments from social capital theory are applied to explain why individuals share information even at (temporary) personal cost. In both realms, the results suggest that the likelihood of sharing decreases with the competitive value of the requested information. Factors related to social capital, i.e., expected reciprocity and the extent to which a scientist’s community conforms to the norm of open science, either directly affect information-sharing or moderate competitive interest considerations on information-sharing. The effect depends on the system to which a scientist belongs.

[1]  J. Schumpeter.  The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle , 1934 .

[2]  R. Merton.  Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[3]  H. Kelley,et al.  The social psychology of groups , 1960 .

[4]  W. Hagstrom.  The scientific community , 1966 .

[5]  R. Merton,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1975, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.

[6]  Norman Kaplan,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1974 .

[7]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[8]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[9]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[10]  D. C. Feldman,et al.  The Development and Enforcement of Group Norms , 1984 .

[11]  J. Hicks,et al.  The economics of science , 1996 .

[12]  W. Eamon,et al.  From the secrets of nature to public knowledge: The origins of the concept of openness in science , 1985 .

[13]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  J. Richardson.  Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education , 1986 .

[16]  Martin Kenney,et al.  Biotechnology: The University-Industrial Complex , 1986 .

[17]  Brian K. Thorn,et al.  Discretionary Data Bases , 1987 .

[18]  E. Hippel.  Cooperation between Rivals: Informal Know-How Trading , 1987 .

[19]  J. Coleman.  Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[20]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Problems in the Measurement of Latent Variables in Structural Equations Causal Models , 1990 .

[21]  N. Rosenberg.  Why do firms do basic research (with their own money) , 1990 .

[22]  K. McCain.  Communication, Competition, and Secrecy: The Production and Dissemination of Research-Related Information in Genetics , 1991 .

[23]  S. Scotchmer,et al.  Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law , 1991 .

[24]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[25]  Amalya L. Oliver,et al.  Social Networks, Learning, and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology Firms , 1994 .

[26]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[27]  S. Hilgartner,et al.  Data Access, Ownership, and Control , 1994 .

[28]  M. Brewer,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises , 1994 .

[29]  D. Hicks.  Published Papers, Tacit Competencies and Corporate Management of the Public/Private Character of Knowledge , 1995 .

[30]  Paula E. Stephan.  The Economics of Science , 1996 .

[31]  S. Kiesler,et al.  The kindness of strangers: on the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice , 1996 .

[32]  Maureen McKelvey.  Evolutionary Innovations: The Business of Biotechnology , 1996 .

[33]  W. Galston.  Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity , 1996 .

[34]  D. E. Stokes.  Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation , 1997 .

[35]  James B. Rebitzer,et al.  The Sociology of Groups and the Economics of Incentives: Theory and Evidence on Compensation Systems , 1997, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[36]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Customization or Conformity? An Institutional and Network Perspective on the Content and Consequences of TQM Adoption , 1997 .

[37]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  The Politics of Management Knowledge. , 1998 .

[38]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[39]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Universities and the market for intellectual property in the life sciences , 1998 .

[40]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[41]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Social Capital and Opportunity in Corporate R&D: The Contingent Effect of Contact Density on Mobility Expectations , 1998 .

[42]  R. Mauborgne,et al.  Procedural justice, strategic decision making, and the knowledge economy , 1998 .

[43]  Klaus M. Schmidt,et al.  Fairness, Incentives, and Contractual Choices , 1999 .

[44]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Network Position and Firm Performance: Organizational Returns to Collaboration in the Biotechnology Industry , 1999 .

[45]  Carrie R. Leana,et al.  Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices , 1999 .

[46]  K. K. Cetina.  Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge , 1999 .

[47]  E. Ostrom.  COPING WITH TRAGEDIES OF THE COMMONS , 1999 .

[48]  Klaus M. Schmidt.  The political economy of mass privatization and the risk of expropriation , 2000 .

[49]  David Blumenthal,et al.  Data withholding in academic medicine: characteristics of faculty denied access to research results and biomaterials , 2000 .

[50]  Isabelle Bouty.  Interpersonal and Interaction Influences on Informal Resource Exchanges Between R&D Researchers Across Organizational Boundaries , 2000 .

[51]  N. Takahashi.  The Emergence of Generalized Exchange , 2000, American Journal of Sociology.

[52]  J. Elster.  Social Norms and Economic Theory: Originally published in Journal of Economic Perspectives 3 (4), 1989 , 2000 .

[53]  R Boyd,et al.  Why people punish defectors. Weak conformist transmission can stabilize costly enforcement of norms in cooperative dilemmas. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[54]  Jonathan Bendor,et al.  The Evolution of Norms1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[55]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[56]  Kevin M. Murphy,et al.  Social Economics: Market Behavior in a Social Environment , 2001 .

[57]  Rajiv Sethi,et al.  Understanding Reciprocity ∗ , 2001 .

[58]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Science and the Diffusion of Knowledge , 2001 .

[59]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms , 2002, Human nature.

[60]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[61]  Urs Bruegger,et al.  Global Microstructures: The Virtual Societies of Financial Markets1 , 2002, American Journal of Sociology.

[62]  Robert Boyd,et al.  Group beneficial norms can spread rapidly in a structured population. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[63]  Max F. Rothschild,et al.  Access to data and intellectual property. , 2002 .

[64]  P. Bourdieu.  Forms of Capital , 2002 .

[65]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept , 2002 .

[66]  Fiona E. Murray.  Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering , 2002 .

[67]  Herbert Gintis,et al.  The hitchhiker's guide to altruism: gene-culture coevolution, and the internalization of norms. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[68]  Siobhan O’Mahony.  Guarding the commons: how community managed software projects protect their work , 2003 .

[69]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: toward a family embeddedness perspective , 2003 .

[70]  Ofer H. Azar.  What Sustains Social Norms and How They Evolve? The Case of Tipping , 2003 .

[71]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[72]  Rajiv N. Rimal,et al.  Understanding the Influence of Perceived Norms on Behaviors , 2003 .

[73]  Martin Kenney,et al.  The role of social embeddedness in professorial entrepreneurship: a comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Stanford , 2004 .

[74]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[75]  Ofer H. Azar.  What Sustains Social Norms and How They Evolve? The Case of Tipping , 2003 .

[76]  Paul A. David,et al.  Understanding the emergence of 'open science' institutions: functionalist economics in historical context , 2004 .

[77]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  The Evolution of Norms , 2005, PLoS biology.

[78]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[79]  W. Powell,et al.  Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[80]  Mike Wright,et al.  Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies , 2005 .

[81]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[82]  Edward L. Glaeser,et al.  Researcher Incentives and Empirical Methods , 2006 .

[83]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  Gender Differences in Patenting in the Academic Life Sciences , 2006, Science.

[84]  A. Hughes.  University Industry Linkages and UK Science and Innovation Policy , 2006 .

[85]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  The Impact of Academic Patenting on the Rate, Quality and Direction of (Public) Research Output , 2009 .

[86]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Where excludability matters: Material versus intellectual property in academic biomedical research , 2007 .

[87]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  The Frontiers of Intellectual Property: Expanded Protection versus New Models of Open Science , 2007 .

[88]  Daniel Lee Kleinman,et al.  Contradiction, convergence and the knowledge economy: the confluence of academic and commercial biotechnology , 2007 .

[89]  Jeannette A. Colyvas.  From divergent meanings to common practices: The early institutionalization of technology transfer in the life sciences at Stanford University , 2007 .

[90]  L. Jeppesen,et al.  The Value of Openness in Scientific Problem Solving , 2007 .

[91]  David F. Midgley,et al.  Formative versus reflective measurement models: two applications of formative measurement | NOVA. The University of Newcastle's Digital Repository , 2008 .

[92]  J. Labinger.  The scientific life : a moral history of a late modern vocation , 2008 .

[93]  D. Gill.  Strategic Disclosure of Intermediate Research Results , 2008 .

[94]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Norms-Based Intellectual Property Systems: The Case of French Chefs , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[95]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Specific and General Information Sharing Among Academic Scientists , 2009 .

[96]  Carolin Haeussler,et al.  The Determinants of Commercialization Strategy: Idiosyncrasies in British and German Biotechnology , 2009 .

[97]  Gerard George,et al.  Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity , 2009 .

[98]  Scott Stern,et al.  Climbing Atop the Shoulders of Giants: The Impact of Institutions on Cumulative Research , 2006, American Economic Review.

[99]  Joachim Henkel,et al.  Champions of Revealing - the Role of Open Source Developers in Commercial Firms , 2008 .

[100]  Marcel Mauss' Essai sur Le Don (The Gift), 1967 Edition with an Introduction by E.E. Evans-Pritchard , 2010 .

[101]  Jeannette A. Colyvas,et al.  Breaking the Ivory Tower: Academic Entrepreneurship in the Life Sciences in UK and Germany , 2011 .

[102]  Peter Thompson,et al.  Entrepreneurs, Jacks of all trades or Hobos? , 2011 .

[103]  Tim Wilson,et al.  A review of business–university collaboration , 2012 .

[104]  Thierry Burger-Helmchen,et al.  Strategic management and the economics of the firm: How to reconcile the brother enemies? , 2012 .