Using Firefighter Mobility Traces to Understand Ad-Hoc Networks in Wildfires

Ad-hoc networks have long been studied as an ideal technology to provide communications in emergency operations when network infrastructures are not available. Nevertheless, this area has not yet delivered enough mature technologies or working prototypes. We suspect that, among other issues, this is due to a lack of understanding of this application domain that forces researchers to make too many assumptions. One of those concerns is the mobility of network nodes. This paper describes, analyzes, and simulates the mobility traces of a fire department during 30 wildfires. The analysis shows interesting insights into the communication range and the type of network in these scenarios. For instance, multi-hop routes are unlikely, so the network behaves like a delay-tolerant network. In addition, the simulation results present a clear image of the network performance under different circumstances that can be used to design applications. We found that the network capacity is low due to the sparse network connectivity. Moreover, the buffer size has a much bigger impact on data delivery than the delay-tolerant routing protocol selected. We think that these are valuable insights and that the traces constitute an important asset for the research community.

[1]  Joao Antonio Pereira,et al.  Linked: The new science of networks , 2002 .

[2]  Matti Siekkinen,et al.  Overlay solution for multimedia data over sparse MANETs , 2009, IWCMC.

[3]  Fabrizio Granelli,et al.  A Software-Defined Device-to-Device Communication Architecture for Public Safety Applications in 5G Networks , 2015, IEEE Access.

[4]  Matthias Frank,et al.  Modelling mobility in disaster area scenarios , 2007, MSWiM '07.

[5]  Yutaka Arakawa,et al.  DTN MapEx: Disaster area mapping through distributed computing over a Delay Tolerant Network , 2015, 2015 Eighth International Conference on Mobile Computing and Ubiquitous Networking (ICMU).

[6]  Xabiel G. Pañeda,et al.  Dynamic Temporal Scalability: Video adaptation in sparse Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks , 2012, 2012 IEEE 8th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob).

[7]  Ying Huang,et al.  CORPS: Event-driven mobility model for first responders in incident scene , 2008, MILCOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Military Communications Conference.

[8]  Liliana Enciso Quispe,et al.  Behavior of Ad Hoc routing protocols, analyzed for emergency and rescue scenarios, on a real urban area , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[9]  Xabiel G. Pañeda,et al.  Understanding Opportunistic Networking for Emergency Services: Analysis of One Year of GPS Traces , 2015, CHANTS@MobiCom.

[10]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing , 2001, RFC.

[11]  Jon Crowcroft,et al.  Evaluating opportunistic networks in disaster scenarios , 2013, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[12]  Thomas Plagemann,et al.  Message lost or message taken - on message ferry selection in DTNs - , 2012, 2012 IFIP Wireless Days.

[13]  Abraham Martín-Campillo,et al.  Providing early resource allocation during emergencies: The mobile triage tag , 2009, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[14]  Gerardo Rubino,et al.  YouSOS: A victim-centered multimedia SOS emergency framework , 2015, 2015 2nd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Disaster Management (ICT-DM).

[15]  Mauricio Marín,et al.  Survey on Simulation for Mobile Ad-Hoc Communication for Disaster Scenarios , 2016, Journal of Computer Science and Technology.

[16]  Philippe Jacquet,et al.  Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR) , 2003, RFC.

[17]  Jörg Ott,et al.  The ONE simulator for DTN protocol evaluation , 2009, SIMUTools 2009.

[18]  Zhensheng Zhang,et al.  Routing in intermittently connected mobile ad hoc networks and delay tolerant networks: overview and challenges , 2006, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[19]  Amin Vahdat,et al.  Epidemic Routing for Partially-Connected Ad Hoc Networks , 2009 .

[20]  Anders Lindgren,et al.  Probabilistic Routing in Intermittently Connected Networks , 2004, SAPIR.

[21]  Marco Conti,et al.  Mobile ad hoc networking: milestones, challenges, and new research directions , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[22]  David Melendi,et al.  CRAWDAD dataset oviedo/asturies-er (v.2016-08-08) , 2016 .

[23]  George Tsirtsis,et al.  LTE for public safety networks , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.