Entrepreneurial Team Development in Academic Spinouts: An Examination of Team Heterogeneity

This article examines the dynamics of entrepreneurial teams as they evolve through the different stages of a spin–out process. Using a unique, hand–collected set of data covering all team members in 10 cases, an in–depth analysis of the heterogeneity of team members’ experience and perception of the strategic orientation needed to attain different milestones in the spin–out process was performed. Our findings suggest that teams evolve over time and change in composition, and therefore, they cannot be studied as immutable entities. At the start of the venture formation, we introduced a new team role, the privileged witness, potentially specific for spinouts. Analysis of the teams indicates that the team's heterogeneity changes as it evolves through the different stages of the spin–out process. In particular, we found that new team members brought in different kinds of experience; however, they did not introduce a different view on doing business from the initial team members.

[1]  Allen C. Amason,et al.  The Effects of Top Management Team Size and interaction Norms on Cognitive and Affective Conflict , 1997 .

[2]  M. Wright,et al.  Spinning Out New Ventures: A Typology of Incubation Strategies from European Research Institutions , 2005 .

[3]  Mike Wright,et al.  Technology Transfer and Universities' Spin-Out Strategies , 2003 .

[4]  A. Pettigrew.  On Studying Organizational Cultures , 1979 .

[5]  Faculteit der Psychologie en Pedagogiek,et al.  Organizational Culture: The Focus Questionnaire , 1999 .

[6]  Violina Ratcheva,et al.  Exploring team formation processes in virtual partnerships , 2001 .

[7]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  Criteria distinguishing successful from unsuccessful ventures in the venture screening process , 1987 .

[8]  M. Wright,et al.  Entrepreneurial Founder Teams: Factors Associated with Member Entry and Exit , 2003 .

[9]  Nicos Nicolaou,et al.  Social Networks in Organizational Emergence: The University Spinout Phenomenon , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Jerome A. Katz,et al.  Finding the Entrepreneur in Entrepreneurship , 1992 .

[11]  B. Clarysse,et al.  Institutional change and resource endowments to science-based entrepreneurial firms , 2005 .

[12]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  Criteria Used by Venture Capitalists to Evaluate New Venture Proposals , 1985 .

[13]  R. Lambert,et al.  Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration: Final Report , 2003 .

[14]  Michael D. Ensley,et al.  Shared cognition in top management teams: implications for new venture performance , 2001 .

[15]  E. Fama,et al.  Separation of Ownership and Control , 1983, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[16]  J. Seeger,et al.  Entrepreneurial Teams in New Venture Creation: A Research Agenda , 1990 .

[17]  Bart Clarysse,et al.  How and Why Do Firms Differ at Start-Up? A Resource-Based Configurational Perspective , 2003 .

[18]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[19]  Allen C. Amason,et al.  Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance , 2002 .

[20]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[21]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[22]  Roland Thomas,et al.  The Canadian Small Business–Bank Interface: A Recursive Model , 1994 .

[23]  B. Clarysse,et al.  How and Why do Research-Based Start-Ups Differ at Founding? A Resource-Based Configurational Perspective , 2004 .

[24]  S. Iammarino,et al.  EU Regions and Multinational Corporations: Change, Stability and Strengthening of Technological Comparative Advantages , 2001 .

[25]  Robert A. Burgelman.  A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in the Diversified Major Firm , 1983 .

[26]  Mike Wright,et al.  Academic and Surrogate Entrepreneurs in University Spin-out Companies , 2001 .

[27]  Sue Birley,et al.  Trade-offs in the investment decisons of European venture capitalists , 1996 .

[28]  Mike Wright,et al.  Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies , 2004 .

[29]  James W. Carland,et al.  The Effect of Entrepreneurial Team Skill Heterogeneity and Functional Diversity on New Venture Performance , 1998 .

[30]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  University-industry relationships: How does the Belgian academic community feel about it?☆ , 1990 .

[31]  B. Clarysse,et al.  A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: the case of a research-based spin-off , 2004 .

[32]  Elizabeth Garnsey,et al.  Do Academic Spin-Outs Differ and Does it Matter? , 2004 .

[33]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  How management teams can have a good fight. , 2009, Harvard business review.