Evaluating and improving cloud phase in the Community Atmosphere Model version 5 using spaceborne lidar observations

Spaceborne lidar observations from the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) satellite are used to evaluate cloud amount and cloud phase in the Community Atmosphere Model version 5 (CAM5), the atmospheric component of a widely used state-of-the-art global coupled climate model (Community Earth System Model). By embedding a lidar simulator within CAM5, the idiosyncrasies of spaceborne lidar cloud detection and phase assignment are replicated. As a result, this study makes scale-aware and definition-aware comparisons between model-simulated and observed cloud amount and cloud phase. In the global mean, CAM5 has insufficient liquid cloud and excessive ice cloud when compared to CALIPSO observations. Over the ice-covered Arctic Ocean, CAM5 has insufficient liquid cloud in all seasons. Having important implications for projections of future sea level rise, a liquid cloud deficit contributes to a cold bias of 2–3°C for summer daily maximum near-surface air temperatures at Summit, Greenland. Over the midlatitude storm tracks, CAM5 has excessive ice cloud and insufficient liquid cloud. Storm track cloud phase biases in CAM5 maximize over the Southern Ocean, which also has larger-than-observed seasonal variations in cloud phase. Physical parameter modifications reduce the Southern Ocean cloud phase and shortwave radiation biases in CAM5 and illustrate the power of the CALIPSO observations as an observational constraint. The results also highlight the importance of using a regime-based, as opposed to a geographic-based, model evaluation approach. More generally, the results demonstrate the importance and value of simulator-enabled comparisons of cloud phase in models used for future climate projection.

[1]  Robert Wood,et al.  Natural aerosols explain seasonal and spatial patterns of Southern Ocean cloud albedo , 2015, Science Advances.

[2]  H. Treut,et al.  THE CALIPSO MISSION: A Global 3D View of Aerosols and Clouds , 2010 .

[3]  Eric Rignot,et al.  A Reconciled Estimate of Ice-Sheet Mass Balance , 2012, Science.

[4]  H. Chepfer,et al.  Comparison of Two Different Cloud Climatologies Derived from CALIOP-Attenuated Backscattered Measurements (Level 1): The CALIPSO-ST and the CALIPSO-GOCCP , 2013 .

[5]  K. Steffen,et al.  Cloud radiative forcing at Summit, Greenland , 2014 .

[6]  G. Cesana,et al.  How well do climate models simulate cloud vertical structure? A comparison between CALIPSO‐GOCCP satellite observations and CMIP5 models , 2012 .

[7]  S. Mikaloff‐Fletcher.  An increasing carbon sink? , 2015, Science.

[8]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  Advanced Two-Moment Bulk Microphysics for Global Models. Part II: Global Model Solutions and Aerosol–Cloud Interactions* , 2015 .

[9]  Veronika Eyring,et al.  Evaluation of Climate Models. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2013 .

[10]  J. Thepaut,et al.  The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system , 2011 .

[11]  U. Mikolajewicz,et al.  Coupled simulations of Greenland Ice Sheet and climate change up to A.D. 2300 , 2015 .

[12]  Yongxiang Hu,et al.  Occurrence, liquid water content, and fraction of supercooled water clouds from combined CALIOP/IIR/MODIS measurements , 2010 .

[13]  M. Shupe,et al.  Resilience of persistent Arctic mixed-phase clouds , 2012 .

[14]  John P. Krasting,et al.  Dominance of the Southern Ocean in Anthropogenic Carbon and Heat Uptake in CMIP5 Models , 2015 .

[15]  H. Chepfer,et al.  Assessment of Global Cloud Datasets from Satellites: Project and Database Initiated by the GEWEX Radiation Panel , 2013 .

[16]  J. Kay,et al.  Processes controlling Southern Ocean shortwave climate feedbacks in CESM , 2014 .

[17]  Tsuyoshi Koshiro,et al.  Origins of the Solar Radiation Biases over the Southern Ocean in CFMIP2 Models , 2014 .

[18]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  Contributions of Clouds, Surface Albedos, and Mixed-Phase Ice Nucleation Schemes to Arctic Radiation Biases in CAM5 , 2014 .

[19]  Karl E. Taylor,et al.  An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design , 2012 .

[20]  Robert Pincus,et al.  Exposing Global Cloud Biases in the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) Using Satellite Observations and Their Corresponding Instrument Simulators , 2012 .

[21]  M. Shupe,et al.  Cloud Radiative Forcing of the Arctic Surface: The Influence of Cloud Properties, Surface Albedo, and Solar Zenith Angle , 2004 .

[22]  John M. Haynes,et al.  COSP: Satellite simulation software for model assessment , 2011 .

[23]  K. Trenberth,et al.  Simulation of Present-Day and Twenty-First-Century Energy Budgets of the Southern Oceans , 2010 .

[24]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  The contribution of cloud and radiation anomalies to the 2007 Arctic sea ice extent minimum , 2008 .

[25]  S. Bony,et al.  The GCM‐Oriented CALIPSO Cloud Product (CALIPSO‐GOCCP) , 2010 .

[26]  W. Collins,et al.  Description of the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model (CAM 3.0) , 2004 .

[27]  Miren Vizcaino,et al.  Ice sheets as interactive components of Earth System Models: progress and challenges , 2014 .

[28]  R. Moss,et al.  Climate model intercomparisons: Preparing for the next phase , 2014 .

[29]  Yen-Ting Hwang,et al.  Link between the double-Intertropical Convergence Zone problem and cloud biases over the Southern Ocean , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Richard G. Forbes,et al.  On the Representation of High-Latitude Boundary Layer Mixed-Phase Cloud in the ECMWF Global Model , 2014 .

[31]  S. Bony,et al.  The ‘too few, too bright’ tropical low‐cloud problem in CMIP5 models , 2012 .

[32]  K. Steffen,et al.  July 2012 Greenland melt extent enhanced by low-level liquid clouds , 2013, Nature.

[33]  David R. Doelling,et al.  Toward Optimal Closure of the Earth's Top-of-Atmosphere Radiation Budget , 2009 .

[34]  K.,et al.  The Community Earth System Model (CESM) large ensemble project: a community resource for studying climate change in the presence of internal climate variability , 2015 .

[35]  David D. Turner,et al.  High and Dry: New Observations of Tropospheric and Cloud Properties above the Greenland Ice Sheet , 2013 .

[36]  G. Cesana,et al.  Evaluation of the cloud thermodynamic phase in a climate model using CALIPSO‐GOCCP , 2013 .

[37]  J. Kay,et al.  The Arctic’s rapidly shrinking sea ice cover: a research synthesis , 2012, Climatic Change.

[38]  W. Collins,et al.  The Community Earth System Model: A Framework for Collaborative Research , 2013 .

[39]  J. Kay,et al.  Global Climate Impacts of Fixing the Southern Ocean Shortwave Radiation Bias in the Community Earth System Model (CESM) , 2016 .

[40]  M. R. van den Broeke,et al.  Clouds enhance Greenland ice sheet meltwater runoff , 2016, Nature Communications.

[41]  G. Cesana,et al.  Ubiquitous low‐level liquid‐containing Arctic clouds: New observations and climate model constraints from CALIPSO‐GOCCP , 2012 .

[42]  S. Bony,et al.  Use of CALIPSO lidar observations to evaluate the cloudiness simulated by a climate model , 2008 .

[43]  Shepard A. Clough,et al.  Retrieving Liquid Wat0er Path and Precipitable Water Vapor From the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Microwave Radiometers , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.