Red flags in data: Learning from failed data reuse experiences

This study examined the data reusers' failed or unsuccessful experience to understand what constituted reusers' failure. Learning from failed experiences is necessary to understand why the failure occurred and to prevent the failure or convert the failure to success. This study offers an alternative view on data reuse practices and provides insights for facilitating data reuse processes by eliminating core components of failure. From the interviews with 23 quantitative social science data reusers who had failed data reuse experiences, the study findings suggest: (a) ease of reuse, particularly the issue of access and interoperability, is the important initial condition for a successful data reuse experience; (b) understanding data through documentation may be less of an issue, at least for experienced researchers to make their data reuse unsuccessful, although the process can still be challenging; and (c) the major component of failed experience is the lack of support in reusing data, which emphasizes the need to develop a support system for data reusers.

[1]  Elizabeth Yakel,et al.  Data reuse and sensemaking among novice social scientists , 2012, ASIST.

[2]  Ben Anderson,et al.  What Are Data? The Many Kinds of Data and Their Implications for Data Re-Use , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[3]  P. Hinds,et al.  The Possibilities and Pitfalls of Doing a Secondary Analysis of a Qualitative Data Set , 1997 .

[4]  Carole L. Palmer,et al.  The analytic potential of scientific data: Understanding re-use value , 2011, ASIST.

[5]  C Gleit,et al.  Secondary data analysis: a valuable resource. , 1989, Nursing research.

[6]  Ayoung Yoon "Making a square fit into a circle": Researchers' experiences reusing qualitative data , 2014, ASIST.

[7]  Ann Zimmerman,et al.  Not by metadata alone: the use of diverse forms of knowledge to locate data for reuse , 2007, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[8]  Elizabeth Yakel,et al.  Social scientists' satisfaction with data reuse , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  Reagan Moore,et al.  Connecting digital libraries to eScience: the future of scientific scholarship , 2007, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[10]  Chris A McMahon,et al.  Opportunities for and Barriers to Engineering Research Data Re-use , 2010 .

[11]  Ixchel M. Faniel,et al.  Reusing Scientific Data: How Earthquake Engineering Researchers Assess the Reusability of Colleagues’ Data , 2010, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[12]  Elizabeth Yakel,et al.  The challenges of digging data: a study of context in archaeological data reuse , 2013, JCDL '13.

[13]  Matthew S. Mayernik,et al.  Who’s Got the Data? Interdependencies in Science and Technology Collaborations , 2012, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[14]  Charlotte P. Lee,et al.  Beyond trust and reliability: reusing data in collaborative cancer epidemiology research , 2013, CSCW.

[15]  Elizabeth Yakel,et al.  The role of data reuse in the apprenticeship process , 2013, ASIST.

[16]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  Data at work: supporting sharing in science and engineering , 2003, GROUP.

[17]  Ayoung Yoon Visible Evidence of Invisible Quality Dimensions and the Role of Data Management , 2016 .

[18]  Jinfang Niu,et al.  Overcoming inadequate documentation , 2009, ASIST.

[19]  Ann G. Green,et al.  Committing to Data Quality Review , 2014, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[20]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  Follow the data: How astronomers use and reuse data , 2012, ASIST.

[21]  Ayoung Yoon,et al.  Data reusers' trust development , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..