Optimal power flow based on successive linear approximation of power flow equations

In this study, the authors introduce a new solution to the alternating current optimal power flow problem based on successive linear approximation of power flow equations. The polar coordination of the power flow equations is used to take advantage of the quasi-linear P– θ relationship. A mathematical transformation for the crossing term of voltage magnitude is used, which guarantees the accuracy of the linear approximation when the quality of initial points regarding voltage magnitude is relatively low in the first few iterations. As a result, the accuracy of the proposed approximation becomes very high in very few iterations. Linearisation method for the quadratic apparent branch flow limits is provided. Methods to recover the AC feasibility from the obtained optimal power flow solution and correct possible constraint violations are introduced. The proposed method is tested in several IEEE and Polish benchmark systems. The difference in objective functions relative to MATPOWER benchmark results is generally <0.1% when the algorithm terminates.

[1]  Daniel S. Kirschen,et al.  MW/voltage control in a linear programming based optimal power flow , 1988 .

[2]  B. Stott,et al.  Further developments in LP-based optimal power flow , 1990 .

[3]  R. Adapa,et al.  A review of selected optimal power flow literature to 1993. I. Nonlinear and quadratic programming approaches , 1999 .

[4]  R. Adapa,et al.  A review of selected optimal power flow literature to 1993. II. Newton, linear programming and interior point methods , 1999 .

[5]  R.J. Thomas,et al.  On Computational Issues of Market-Based Optimal Power Flow , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  K. Fujisawa,et al.  Semidefinite programming for optimal power flow problems , 2008 .

[7]  Xiaoqing Bai,et al.  Semi-definite programming-based method for security-constrained unit commitment with operational and optimal power flow constraints , 2009 .

[8]  K. Swarup,et al.  Sequential quadratic programming based differential evolution algorithm for optimal power flow problem , 2011 .

[9]  R D Zimmerman,et al.  MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  Steven H. Low,et al.  Branch Flow Model: Relaxations and Convexification—Part II , 2012 .

[11]  Aniruddha Bhattacharya,et al.  Solution of multi-objective optimal power flow using gravitational search algorithm , 2012 .

[12]  S. Low,et al.  Zero Duality Gap in Optimal Power Flow Problem , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  Florin Capitanescu,et al.  Critical review of recent advances and further developments needed in AC optimal power flow , 2016 .

[14]  Paula A. Lipka,et al.  A Successive Linear Programming Approach to Solving the IV-ACOPF , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  Santanu S. Dey,et al.  Inexactness of SDP Relaxation and Valid Inequalities for Optimal Power Flow , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[16]  Vijay Vittal,et al.  Analyzing the Impacts of Constraint Relaxation Practices in Electric Energy Markets , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  Carleton Coffrin,et al.  The QC relaxation: A theoretical and computational study on optimal power flow , 2016, 2017 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.