Knowledge and Perceptions in Participatory Policy Processes: Lessons from the Delta-Region in the Netherlands

Water resources management issues tend to affect a variety of uses and users. Therefore, they often exhibit complex and unstructured problems. The complex, unstructured nature of these problems originates from uncertain knowledge and from the existence of divergent perceptions among various actors. Consequently, dealing with these problems is not just a knowledge problem; it is a problem of ambiguity too. This paper focuses on a complex, unstructured water resources management issue, the sustainable development—for ecology, economy and society—of the Delta-region of the Netherlands. In several areas in this region the ecological quality decreased due to hydraulic constructions for storm water safety, the Delta Works. To improve the ecological quality, the Dutch government regards the re-establishment of estuarine dynamics in the area as the most important solution. However, re-establishment of estuarine dynamics will affect other uses and other users. Among the affected users are farmers in the surrounding areas, who use freshwater from a lake for agricultural purposes. This problem has been addressed in a participatory decision-making process, which is used as a case study in this paper. We investigate how the dynamics in actors’ perceptions and the knowledge base contribute to the development of agreed upon and valid knowledge about the problem–solution combination, using our conceptual framework for problem structuring. We found that different knowledge sources—expert and practical knowledge—should be integrated to create a context-specific knowledge base, which is scientifically valid and socially robust. Furthermore, we conclude that for the convergence of actors’ perceptions, it is essential that actors learn about the content of the process (cognitive learning) and about the network in which they are involved (strategic learning). Our findings form a plea for practitioners in water resources management to adopt a problem structuring approach in order to deal explicitly with uncertainty and ambiguity.

[1]  E. J. Bos,et al.  Transitie en toekomst van de deltalandbouw: indicatoren voor de ontwikkeling van de land- en tuinbouw in de Zuidwestelijke delta van Nederland , 2005 .

[2]  J. de Kruijf,et al.  Problem structuring in interactive decision-making processes: How interaction, problem perceptions and knowledge contribute to a joint formulation of a problem and solutions , 2007 .

[3]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Frame Reflection: Toward The Resolution Of Intractable Policy Controversies , 1994 .

[4]  Jan P.M. Mulder,et al.  Role of perceptions and knowledge in the impact assessment for the extension of Mainport Rotterdam , 2009 .

[5]  O. V. D. Riet,et al.  Policy analysis in a multi-actor policy settings: navigating between negotiated nonsense & superfluous knowledge , 2003 .

[6]  K. D'angremond,et al.  Angremond From Disaster to Delta Project : The Storm Flood of 1953 , 2003 .

[7]  J. V. Ast,et al.  Participation in European water policy , 2003 .

[8]  S. V. Meijerink.  Rivierbeheer als leerproces. Een tussentijdse evaluatie van het procesontwerp voor de PKB Ruimte voor de Rivier , 2004 .

[9]  David King,et al.  Involving stakeholders in integrated river basin planning in England and Wales , 2006 .

[10]  C. Blackmore.  What kinds of knowledge, knowing and learning are required for addressing resource dilemmas? A theoretical overview , 2007 .

[11]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[12]  W. Scott.  Stakeholders of the organizational mind , 1983 .

[13]  Frank Fischer,et al.  The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning , 1993 .

[14]  Martijn Leijten,et al.  Megaprojects and Contested Information , 2007 .

[15]  J. Glicken.  Getting stakeholder participation ‘right’: a discussion of participatory processes and possible pitfalls , 2000 .

[16]  E. Klijn,et al.  Managing Uncertainties in Networks a Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making , 2004 .

[17]  G. J. Borger.  The Netherlands and the North Sea; a close relationship in historical perspective , 2004 .

[18]  John Grin,et al.  Waarom het kan verkeren : Een vergelijkende analyse van de wijzen van temmen van het automobiliteitsvraagstuk door drie instituten voor parlementaire technologie eveluatie , 1999 .

[19]  Matthijs Hisschemöller,et al.  Knowledge, Power, and Participation in Environmental Policy Analysis , 2001 .

[20]  Peter P.J. Driessen,et al.  Beyond the art of diking: interactive policy on river management in The Netherlands , 2001 .

[21]  Matthijs Hisschemöller,et al.  Coping with intractable controversies: The case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis , 1995 .

[22]  J. A. de Bruijn,et al.  Scientific expertise in complex decision-making processes , 1999 .

[23]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Can England Learn Lessons from Bangladesh in Introducing Participatory Floodplain Management? , 2008 .

[24]  J. Edelenbos,et al.  Managing Stakeholder Involvement in Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Six Interactive Processes in the Netherlands , 2006 .

[25]  I.C.M. van der Weijden,et al.  Kennis-vragen in de Polder , 2005 .

[26]  Erik-Hans Klijn,et al.  Dealing with Wicked Problems in Networks: Analyzing an Environmental Debate from a Network Perspective , 2003 .

[27]  Judith E. Innes,et al.  The Impact of Collaborative Planning on Governance Capacity , 2003 .

[28]  P. Keur,et al.  Identification of Major Sources of Uncertainty in Current IWRM Practice. Illustrated for the Rhine Basin , 2008 .

[29]  C Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Integrated management of natural resources: dealing with ambiguous issues, multiple actors and diverging frames. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[30]  Jurian Edelenbos,et al.  'Polderen over de feiten': waar komt het vandaan en wat levert het op? , 2005 .

[31]  Jeroen Huisman,et al.  The rise of interactive governance and quasi-markets , 2003 .

[32]  Marian Stuiver,et al.  Learning in context through conflict and alignment: Farmers and scientists in search of sustainable agriculture , 2005 .

[33]  David Dery,et al.  Problem Definition in Policy Analysis , 1984 .

[34]  E. Elliott.  Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers , 1983 .

[35]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Social Learning and Water Resources Management , 2007 .

[36]  C J Colijn,et al.  Physical planning in the coastal region of Zeeland, the Netherlands , 1998 .

[37]  C. D. Beaumont.  Pitfalls of Analysis , 1981 .

[38]  Jurian Edelenbos,et al.  A double helix approach: a proposal to forge a better integration of analysis and process in policy development , 2003 .

[39]  E. Turnhout,et al.  Participeren in onzekerheid - Literatuuronderzoek naar het inzetten van participatie in wetenschappelijke beleidsadvisering , 2004 .

[40]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[41]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  Stakeholders of the Organizational Mind: Toward a New View of Organizational Policy Making. , 1985 .

[42]  Giacomo Mauro DAriano.  Identity and Control: A Structural Theory of Social Action. , 1994 .

[43]  Erik-Hans Klijn,et al.  Managing knowledge in policy networks. Organising joint fact-finding in the Scheldt Estuary. , 2007 .

[44]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change , 2006 .

[45]  Warren E. Walker,et al.  Defining Uncertainty: A Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-Based Decision Support , 2003 .

[46]  E. Mostert.  The challenge of public participation , 2003 .

[47]  J. Rinaudo,et al.  The Benefits of Combining Lay and Expert Input for Water-Management Planning at the Watershed Level , 2005 .

[48]  M. J. Kolkman,et al.  Mental model mapping as a new tool to analyse the use of information in decision-making in integrated water management , 2005 .

[49]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Policy Change And Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach , 1993 .

[50]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Participative and Stakeholder-Based Policy Design, Evaluation and Modeling Processes , 2002 .

[51]  Michael S. Carolan,et al.  Social change and the adoption and adaptation of knowledge claims: Whose truth do you trust in regard to sustainable agriculture? , 2006 .

[52]  Arwin van Buuren.  Competente besluitvorming: het management van meervoudige kennis in ruimtelijke ontwikkelingsprocessen , 2006 .

[53]  H. Nowotny.  Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge , 2003 .

[54]  H. De Bruijn,et al.  Process Management: Why Project Management Fails in Complex Decision Making Processes , 2005 .

[55]  R. Hoppe,et al.  Beleid en Politiek. Een Inleiding tot de Beleidswetenschap en de Beleidskunde , 1996 .

[56]  T. Lynam,et al.  A review of tools for incorporating community knowledge, preferences, and values into decision making in natural resources management , 2007 .

[57]  P. Sabatier.  An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein , 1988 .

[58]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Reframing Policy Discourse , 2020, The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning.