IT project decisions: conclusions and recommendations for corporate practice

The purpose of this paper is to clarify the relevant determinants of IT project decision making and their relevance in corporate practice.,The empiric analysis used in-depth expert interviews (n=18) as method for data collection and qualitative content analysis using evaluative categories for analysis.,Corporate practice is strongly influenced by descriptive decision making. There is only little use of normative decision models in decision making. In corporate practice little use is made of evaluations to analyze achieved project outputs and impacts to improve decision-making practice. This is the result of several evaluation barriers in organizations.,The sample is restricted to IT projects as the experts are responsible for IT project portfolio management. Also, an industry comparison is not included in the study.,The analysis shows that IT project decision making in corporate practice should include results from descriptive decision theory into project decision processes in corporate practice. More effort should be made in challenging project input data which is relevant for project decision making. By systematically including evaluations for relevant projects, the deviations between planned and achieved project impacts offer valuable feedback for estimators and decision makers.,The paper presents detailed analysis on decision variables and their relevance for IT project decision making in corporate practice. Critical aspects of decision making become clear, such as the aspects of evaluation barriers and the need to incorporate descriptive decision-making aspects into corporate decision processes.

[1]  J. Geraldi,et al.  Errors, lies and misunderstandings: Systematic review on behavioural decision making in projects , 2017 .

[2]  A. Samson The behavioral economics guide 2017 (with an introduction by Cass Sunstein) , 2017 .

[3]  Avo Schönbohm,et al.  Reflective and cognitive perspectives on international capital budgeting , 2016 .

[4]  Keld Pedersen,et al.  IT Project Selection: Politics, Experience and good Friends , 2016 .

[5]  J. Geraldi,et al.  From Visions of Grandeur to Grand Failure: Alternative schools of descriptive decision theories to explain the Berlin Brandenburg , 2016 .

[6]  Peerasit Patanakul,et al.  When narcissism drives project champions: A review and research agenda , 2015 .

[7]  Crispin R. Coombs,et al.  When planned IS/IT project benefits are not realized: a study of inhibitors and facilitators to benefits realization , 2015 .

[8]  J. Lerner,et al.  Emotion and decision making. , 2015, Annual review of psychology.

[9]  M. Mullaly The role of agency in project initiation decisions , 2014 .

[10]  G. Gigerenzer Risk Savvy: How to Make Good Decisions , 2014 .

[11]  J. Pinto Project management, governance, and the normalization of deviance , 2014 .

[12]  Harvey Maylor,et al.  Performers, trackers, lemmings and the lost: sustained false optimism in forecasting project outcomes—evidence from a quasi-experiment , 2011, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[13]  M. Sibanda,et al.  Impact of Analytics in Financial Decision Making: Evidence from a Case Study Approach , 2014 .

[14]  Ebrahim Sharifi Tashnizi,et al.  Selecting balanced portfolios of R&D projects with interdependencies: A Cross-Entropy based methodology , 2014 .

[15]  Jeffrey K. Pinto,et al.  Lies, damned lies, and project plans: Recurring human errors that can ruin the project planning process , 2013 .

[16]  M. Martinsuo Project portfolio management in practice and in context , 2013 .

[17]  N. Jigeesh Selection of Project as Important Beginning for Information Technology Project Management , 2012 .

[18]  Ping-Teng Chang,et al.  A fuzzy DEA and knapsack formulation integrated model for project selection , 2012, Comput. Oper. Res..

[19]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Before you make that big decision... , 2011, Harvard business review.

[20]  Chris Verhoef,et al.  Quantifying IT forecast quality , 2009, Sci. Comput. Program..

[21]  Lurdes Y. T. Inoue,et al.  Decision Theory: Principles and Approaches , 2009 .

[22]  Martin Peterson,et al.  An Introduction to Decision Theory , 2009 .

[23]  Jeffrey L. Ringuest,et al.  Probabilistic dominance criteria for comparing uncertain alternatives: A tutorial , 2009 .

[24]  Karlheinz Haberlandt 4. Controlling – quo vadis? , 2009 .

[25]  Konrad Spang,et al.  Cultural differences in decision making in project teams , 2009 .

[26]  Manuel A. Nunez,et al.  Strategic Planning and Project Selection for IT Portfolio Management , 2009 .

[27]  Barry Shore,et al.  Systematic Biases and Culture in Project Failures , 2008 .

[28]  Jon D. Perkins,et al.  Mental budgeting versus marginal decision making: training, experience and justification effects on decisions involving sunk costs , 2008 .

[29]  William H. Money,et al.  Impact of Organizational and Project Factors on Acceptance and Usage of Project Management Software and Perceived Project Success , 2008 .

[30]  Diederik J. D. Wijnmalen,et al.  Analysis of benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks (BOCR) with the AHP-ANP: A critical validation , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[31]  Chotchai Charoenngam,et al.  Strategic project selection in public sector: Construction projects of the Ministry of Defence in Thailand , 2007 .

[32]  Stephen A. Leybourne,et al.  The role of intuition and improvisation in project management , 2006 .

[33]  Narcyz Roztocki,et al.  A Procedure for Smooth Implementation of Activity-Based Costing in Small Companies , 2004 .

[34]  Ray Ashman Project estimation: a simple use-case-based model , 2004, IT Professional.

[35]  Russell L. Purvis,et al.  Heuristics and Biases in Information Systems Project Management , 2004 .

[36]  Wing Lam,et al.  An enterprise integration methodology , 2004, IT Professional.

[37]  N. Kerr,et al.  Group performance and decision making. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[38]  T. C. Powell,et al.  Behavioral strategy , 2002 .

[39]  Stephen C. Graves,et al.  Technology portfolio management: optimizing interdependent projects over multiple time periods , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[40]  David M. Messick,et al.  Ethical Leadership and the Psychology of Decision Making , 2001 .

[41]  G. Gigerenzer Decision Making: Nonrational Theories , 2001 .

[42]  Norman P. Archer,et al.  Project portfolio selection through decision support , 2000, Decis. Support Syst..

[43]  Fereidoun Ghasemzadeh,et al.  An integrated framework for project portfolio selection , 1999 .

[44]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Book Reviews : Scientific Opportunities and Public Needs: Improv ing Priority Setting and Public Input at the National Institutes of Health. Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1998, 136 pages, $26.00 , 1998 .

[45]  H. Raiffa,et al.  The hidden traps in decision making. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[46]  N. Kerr,et al.  Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups. , 1996 .

[47]  Jack R. Meredith,et al.  Project Management: A Managerial Approach , 1989 .

[48]  Helmut Laux,et al.  Grundlagen der Organisation : die Steuerung von Entscheidungen als Grundproblem der Betriebswirtschaftslehre , 1987 .

[49]  R. Cooper,et al.  An Investigation into the New Product Process: Steps, Deficiencies, and Impact , 1986 .

[50]  J. Fredrickson The Strategic Decision Process and Organizational Structure , 1986 .

[51]  F. McFarlan,et al.  The information archipelago--plotting a course. , 1983, Harvard business review.

[52]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[53]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[54]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[55]  H. Simon,et al.  Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioural Science , 1966 .