Wildfire, landscape diversity and the Drossel–Schwabl model

How simple can a model be that still captures essential aspects of wildfire ecosystems at large spatial and temporal scales? The Drossel–Schwabl model (DSM) is a metaphorical forest-fire model developed to reproduce only one pattern of real systems: a frequency distribution of fire sizes resembling a power law. Consequently, and because it appears oversimplified, it remains unclear what bearings the DSM has in reality. Here, we test whether the DSM is capable of reproducing a pattern that was not considered in its design, the hump-shaped relation between the diversity of succession stages and average annual area burnt. We found that the model, once reformulated to represent succession, produces realistic landscape diversity patterns. We investigated four succession scenarios of forest-fire ecosystems in the USA and Canada. In all scenarios, landscape diversity is highest at an intermediate average annual area burnt as predicted by the intermediate disturbance hypothesis. These results show that a model based solely on the dynamics of the fuel mosaic has surprisingly high predictive power with regard to observed statistical properties of wildfire systems at large spatial scales. Parsimonious models, such as the DSM can be used as starting points for systematic development of more structurally realistic but tractable wildfire models. Due to their simplicity they allow analytical approaches that further our understanding under increasing complexity.

[1]  R. Suffling,et al.  Control of landscape diversity by catastrophic disturbance: A theory and a case study of fire in a Canadian boreal forest , 1988 .

[2]  James K. Brown,et al.  Surface Fuel Loadings and Prediced Fire Behavior for Vegetation Types in the Northern Rocky Mountains , 1986 .

[3]  Ricardo Díaz-Delgado,et al.  Self-organized criticality of wildfires ecologically revisited , 2001 .

[4]  A Ratz,et al.  Long-Term Spatial Patterns Created by Fire: a Model Oriented Towards Boreal Forests , 1995 .

[5]  Brian J. Stocks,et al.  Predicted and Observed Rates of Spread of Crown Fires in Immature Jack Pine , 1986 .

[6]  S. Pueyo.  Self-Organised Criticality and the Response of Wildland Fires to Climate Change , 2007 .

[7]  J. M. Hett,et al.  Forest Succession Models: A Rationale and Methodology for Modeling Forest Succession over Large Regions , 1973 .

[8]  Drossel,et al.  Self-organized critical forest-fire model. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[9]  Max A. Moritz,et al.  ANALYZING EXTREME DISTURBANCE EVENTS: FIRE IN LOS PADRES NATIONAL FOREST , 1997 .

[10]  M. Turner.  Landscape ecology: what is the state of the science? , 2005 .

[11]  James W. Sinko,et al.  A New Model For Age‐Size Structure of a Population , 1967 .

[12]  Uta Berger,et al.  Pattern-Oriented Modeling of Agent-Based Complex Systems: Lessons from Ecology , 2005, Science.

[13]  Peter Grassberger,et al.  On a self-organized critical forest-fire model , 1993 .

[14]  Stephen R. Kessell,et al.  A quantitative succession model for nine montana forest communities , 1980 .

[15]  B. Drossel,et al.  Forest fires and other examples of self-organized criticality , 1996, cond-mat/9610201.

[16]  J. Connell.  Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. , 1978, Science.

[17]  E. Johnson,et al.  Wildfire Regime in the Boreal Forest and the Idea of Suppression and Fuel Buildup , 2001 .

[18]  V. Grimm,et al.  More Realistic than Anticipated: A Classical Forest-Fire Model from Statistical Physics Captures Real Fire Shapes , 2008 .

[19]  I. Station,et al.  Research paper. INT , 1981 .

[20]  E. Johnson,et al.  The Relative Importance of Fuels and Weather on Fire Behavior in Subalpine Forests , 1995 .

[21]  C. E. Van Wagner,et al.  Conditions for the start and spread of crown fire , 1977 .

[22]  Wang Bing-Hong,et al.  Self-organized criticality of forest fire in China , 2001 .

[23]  D. Turcotte,et al.  Forest fires: An example of self-organized critical behavior , 1998, Science.

[24]  Marco Marchetti,et al.  The flaming sandpile: self-organized criticality and wildfires , 1999 .

[25]  A. Huth,et al.  Testing the intermediate disturbance hypothesis: when will there be two peaks of diversity? , 2005 .

[26]  G. Caldarelli,et al.  Percolation in real wildfires , 2001, cond-mat/0108011.

[27]  Marco E. Morais,et al.  Wildfires, complexity, and highly optimized tolerance. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  P. Grassberger.  Critical behaviour of the Drossel-Schwabl forest fire model , 2002, cond-mat/0202022.

[29]  M. Turner,et al.  Landscape dynamics in crown fire ecosystems , 1994, Landscape Ecology.