On scalability of platoon of automated vehicles for leader-predecessor information framework

It is well known and broadly accepted that the leader-predecessor framework has been proposed to fix the string instability which is caused by applying the single-predecessor information framework. However, a reasonable but easily neglected fact is that the communication delay between the leading vehicle and the following vehicle is larger than the communication delay between the immediate preceding vehicle and the following vehicle when the large platoon is under consideration. The scalability issue arisen immediately is that whether or not the proposed control laws guaranteeing string stability for the small/medium platoon are suitable for the large platoon. This paper firstly proposes PD control law and sliding model control law for constant distance spacing policy and constant time headway spacing policy respectively, and then proves that both of the two control laws can guarantee string stability for the small/medium platoon. Secondly, it demonstrates that the PD control law for constant distance spacing policy can not guarantee string stability for the large platoon but the sliding model control law for constant time headway spacing policy can. In other words, the sliding model control law for constant time headway spacing policy can make the platoon applying leader-predecessor information framework scalable.

[1]  J.K. Hedrick,et al.  Longitudinal Vehicle Controller Design for IVHS Systems , 1991, 1991 American Control Conference.

[2]  Diana Yanakiev,et al.  A SIMPLIFIED FRAMEWORK FOR STRING STABILITY ANALYSIS OF AUTOMATED VEHICLES , 1998 .

[3]  Rajesh Rajamani,et al.  An Experimental Comparative Study of Autonomous and Co-operative Vehicle-follower Control Systems , 2001 .

[4]  Jing Zhou,et al.  Range policy of adaptive cruise control vehicles for improved flow stability and string stability , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[5]  Petros A. Ioannou,et al.  A Comparision of Spacing and Headway Control Laws for Automatically Controlled Vehicles1 , 1994 .

[6]  K. Chu Decentralized Control of High-Speed Vehicular Strings , 1974 .

[7]  J. Hedrick,et al.  String stability of interconnected systems , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 American Control Conference - ACC'95.

[8]  Andrea Goldsmith,et al.  Effects of communication delay on string stability in vehicle platoons , 2001, ITSC 2001. 2001 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems. Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8585).

[9]  SU-NAN HUANG,et al.  Design of vehicle following control systems with actuator delays , 1997, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[10]  S. Darbha A Note About the Stability of a String of LTI Systems , 2002 .

[11]  Shahdan Sudin,et al.  Convoy Dynamics with Bidirectional Flow of Control Information , 2003 .

[12]  D. Swaroop,et al.  A review of constant time headway policy for automatic vehicle following , 2001, ITSC 2001. 2001 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems. Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8585).

[13]  J. K. Hedrick,et al.  Modeling and Validation of Automotive Engines for Control Algorithm Development , 1992 .

[14]  Diana Yanakiev,et al.  Longitudinal control of automated CHVs with significant actuator delays , 2001, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[15]  J. K. Hedrick,et al.  Constant Spacing Strategies for Platooning in Automated Highway Systems , 1999 .

[16]  Peter Seiler,et al.  Disturbance propagation in vehicle strings , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[17]  L. Peppard,et al.  String stability of relative-motion PID vehicle control systems , 1974 .

[18]  Feng Gao,et al.  Stability of String of Adaptive Cruise Control Vehicles with Parasitic Delays and Lags , 2008, 2008 11th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[19]  J. Hedrick,et al.  String stability of interconnected systems , 1996, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..