Evaluation of the preliminary auditory profile test battery in an international multi-centre study

Abstract Objective: This paper describes the composition and international multi-centre evaluation of a battery of tests termed the preliminary auditory profile. It includes measures of loudness perception, listening effort, speech perception, spectral and temporal resolution, spatial hearing, self-reported disability and handicap, and cognition. Clinical applicability and comparability across different centres are investigated. Design: Headphone tests were conducted in five centres divided over four countries. Effects of test-retest, ear, and centre were investigated. Results for normally-hearing (NH) and hearing-impaired (HI) listeners are presented. Study sample: Thirty NH listeners aged 19–39 years, and 72 HI listeners aged 22–91 years with a broad range of hearing losses were included. Results: Test-retest reliability was generally good and there were very few right/left ear effects. Results of all tests were comparable across centres for NH listeners after baseline correction to account for necessary differences between test materials. For HI listeners, results were comparable across centres for the language-independent tests. Conclusions: The auditory profile forms a clinical test battery that is applicable in four different languages. Even after baseline correction, differences between test materials have to be taken into account when interpreting results of language-dependent tests in HI listeners.

[1]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  The role of silent intervals for sentence intelligibility in fluctuating noise in hearing-impaired listeners , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[2]  Rainer Martin,et al.  HearCom: hearing in the communication society , 2011 .

[3]  J M Festen,et al.  Relations between auditory functions in impaired hearing. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  V Hohmann,et al.  Effect of hearing loss, centre frequency, and bandwidth on the shape of loudness functions in categorical loudness scaling. , 2001, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[6]  T. Houtgast,et al.  Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  W. Noble,et al.  The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) , 2004, International journal of audiology.

[8]  R. Häusler,et al.  Sound localization in subjects with impaired hearing. Spatial-discrimination and interaural-discrimination tests. , 1983, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[9]  W. Dreschler,et al.  ICRA noises: artificial noise signals with speech-like spectral and temporal properties for hearing instrument assessment. International Collegium for Rehabilitative Audiology. , 2001, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[10]  Graham Naylor,et al.  Benefits from hearing aids in relation to the interaction between the user and the environment , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[11]  P. Van cauwenberge,et al.  Sensitivity of transient evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions to the direct effects of noise on the human cochlea. , 1999, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[12]  R. Patterson,et al.  The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  Efficient adaptive procedures for threshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics and speech intelligibility tests. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  H. Dillon,et al.  An international comparison of long‐term average speech spectra , 1994 .

[15]  S. Arlinger,et al.  A method for evaluating temporal, spectral and combined temporal-spectral resolution of hearing. , 1998, Scandinavian audiology.

[16]  B. Moore,et al.  Psychoacoustic abilities of subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing impairments and their relationship to the ability to understand speech. , 1989, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[17]  Robert H. Logie,et al.  Components of fluent reading , 1985 .

[18]  Birgitta Larsby,et al.  A Swedish version of the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT) for measurement of speech recognition , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[19]  W A Dreschler,et al.  Relations between psychophysical data and speech perception for hearing-impaired subjects. II. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Susan G. Blandy,et al.  Hearing threshold levels and speech recognition in noise in 7-year-olds , 2005, International journal of audiology.

[21]  FP6-004171 HEARCOM Hearing in the Communication Society , 2005 .

[22]  T Houtgast,et al.  Method for the selection of sentence materials for efficient measurement of the speech reception threshold. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  D. Grantham,et al.  Auditory spatial resolution in horizontal, vertical, and diagonal planes. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  G. Schwarz.  Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[25]  J. C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Individual differences in external-ear transfer functions reduced by scaling in frequency. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  S. Kramer,et al.  The self-reported handicapping effect of hearing disabilities. , 1998, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[27]  W A Dreschler,et al.  Speech reception in reverberation related to temporal resolution. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[28]  Andreas Silzle.  Generation of Quality Taxonomies for Auditory Virtual Environments by Means of a Systematic Expert Survey , 2009 .

[29]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  The Choice of Compression Speed in Hearing Aids: Theoretical and Practical Considerations and the Role of Individual Differences , 2008, Trends in amplification.

[30]  S. Athalye.  Factors affecting speech recognition in noise and hearing loss in adults with a wide variety of auditory capabilities , 2010 .

[31]  S Arlinger,et al.  Evaluation of a cognitive test battery in young and elderly normal-hearing and hearing-impaired persons. , 2001, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[32]  I M Noordhoek,et al.  Relations between intelligibility of narrow-band speech and auditory functions, both in the 1-kHz frequency region. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  W Noble,et al.  Disabilities and handicaps associated with impaired auditory localization. , 1995, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[34]  T. Lunner,et al.  Clinical trial of a digital hearing aid. , 1998, Scandinavian audiology.

[35]  Tammo Houtgast,et al.  Auditory and nonauditory factors affecting speech reception in noise by older listeners. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  Volker Hohmann,et al.  An adaptive procedure for categorical loudness scaling. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Wouter A Dreschler,et al.  The relationship between the intelligibility of time-compressed speech and speech in noise in young and elderly listeners. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  A. Mills.  On the minimum audible angle , 1958 .

[39]  Birgitta Larsby,et al.  Cognitive performance and perceived effort in speech processing tasks: effects of different noise backgrounds in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. , 2005, International journal of audiology.

[40]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[41]  W. A. Dreschler,et al.  D-2-1 : Implementation of a preliminary test set for auditory impairments , 2005 .

[42]  Tammo Houtgast,et al.  The development of the text reception threshold test: a visual analogue of the speech reception threshold test. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[43]  Wouter A. Dreschler,et al.  ICRA Noises: Artificial Noise Signals with Speech-like Spectral and Temporal Properties for Hearing Instrument Assessment: Ruidos ICRA: Señates de ruido artificial con espectro similar al habla y propiedades temporales para pruebas de instrumentos auditivos , 2001 .

[44]  K. Saberi,et al.  Localization in an Echoic Environment , 1992 .

[45]  Tammo Houtgast,et al.  The binaural intelligibility level difference in hearing-impaired listeners: the role of supra-threshold deficits. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  J Bamford,et al.  The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. , 1979, British journal of audiology.

[47]  J. C. Middlebrooks.  Virtual localization improved by scaling nonindividualized external-ear transfer functions in frequency. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[48]  B Hagerman,et al.  Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. , 1982, Scandinavian audiology.

[49]  R. Plomp,et al.  The Reception Threshold of Interrupted Speech for Hearing-Impaired Listeners , 1983 .

[50]  Stuart Gatehouse,et al.  Interaural asymmetry of hearing loss, Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) disabilities, and handicap , 2004, International Journal of Audiology.

[51]  B C Moore,et al.  Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[52]  B Kollmeier,et al.  Development and evaluation of a German sentence test for objective and subjective speech intelligibility assessment. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[53]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  M. Tervaniemi,et al.  Lateralization of auditory-cortex functions , 2003, Brain Research Reviews.

[55]  S Arlinger,et al.  Auditory temporal and spectral resolution in normal and impaired hearing. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[56]  G. Andersson,et al.  Psychometric evaluation of the Gothenburg Profile for measurement of experienced hearing disability and handicap: applications with new hearing aid candidates and experienced hearing aid users. , 1998, British journal of audiology.