Printability and actinic AIMS review of programmed mask blank defects

We report on the printability, mitigation and actinic mask level review of programmed substrate blank pit and bump defects in a EUV lithography test mask. We show the wafer printing behavior of these defects exposed with an NXE:3300 EUV lithography scanner and the corresponding mask level actinic review using the AIMSTM tool. We will show which categories of these blank substrate defects print on wafer and how they can be mitigated by hiding these defects under absorber lines. Furthermore we show that actinic AIMSTM mask review images of these defects, in combination with a simple thresholded resist transfer model, can accurately predict their wafer printing profiles. We also compare mask level actinic AIMSTM to top down mask SEM review in their ability to detect these defects.

[1]  Ryoung-Han Kim,et al.  Ni-TaN Nanocomposite Absorber For Next-Generation Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography , 2016 .

[2]  Frank Goodwin,et al.  Mitigation of EUV mask blank substrate pit and scratch defects by Accelerated Neutral Atom Beam (ANAB) processing , 2014, Advanced Lithography.

[3]  Kenneth A. Goldberg,et al.  Mask blank defect printability comparison using optical and SEM mask and wafer inspection and bright field actinic mask imaging , 2015, Other Conferences.

[4]  Sungmin Huh,et al.  Defect printability studies at SEMATECH , 2013, Photomask and Next Generation Lithography Mask Technology.

[5]  Ying Li,et al.  Compensation for EUV multilayer defects within arbitrary layouts by absorber pattern modification , 2011, Advanced Lithography.

[6]  Renzo Capelli,et al.  Actinic review of EUV masks: status and recent results of the AIMSTM EUV system , 2015, SPIE Photomask Technology.

[7]  Stephen Hsu,et al.  Application of EUV resolution enhancement techniques (RET) to optimize and extend single exposure bi-directional patterning for 7nm and beyond logic designs , 2016, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[8]  Kenneth A. Goldberg,et al.  EUV actinic brightfield mask microscopy for predicting printed defect images , 2015, SPIE Photomask Technology.

[9]  Iacopo Mochi,et al.  Printability and inspectability of defects on the EUV mask for sub-32nm half pitch HVM application , 2011, Advanced Lithography.

[10]  Obert Wood,et al.  Thin absorber EUV photomask based on mixed Ni and TaN material , 2016, Photomask Japan.

[11]  Shu-Hao Chang,et al.  Printability of buried mask defects in extreme UV lithography , 2011, Advanced Lithography.

[12]  Kenneth A. Goldberg,et al.  EUV mask multilayer defects and their printability under different multilayer deposition conditions , 2012, Advanced Lithography.

[13]  Masaki Satake,et al.  EUV multilayer defect compensation (MDC) by absorber pattern modification: from theory to wafer validation , 2011, Photomask Technology.