Incorporating sustainability in decision-making for medical device development

Abstract The development and commercialization of contemporary medical devices are inherently multidisciplinary. Consequently, they have to undergo a stringent regulatory compliance procedure in conformity with an ever increasingly fierce and competitive business environment. Throughout the product life cycle, medical devices would significantly consume renewable as well as non-renewable resources and as a result exert a substantial social, economic and environmental impact(s). Sustainability from an overall perspective in terms of social, economic and environmental domains is crucial for decision-making during product development; nevertheless they have rarely been incorporated simultaneously. Both public and private institutions only focused towards economic and environmental sustainability without acknowledging the critical role of social sustainability that needs to be addressed concurrently so as to uphold the other two. Accordingly, it is imperative to consider the criteria of the aforementioned domains of sustainability in the initial phases of product development. The proposed conceptual multifaceted framework comprehensively explores a broader scope of sustainable product development, mainly from the pragmatic standpoint of systems engineering in comparison to the contemporary evaluation and development approaches. The underpinnings of the proposed framework encompass the critical role of a MultiCriteria Hierarchical Model (MCHM), which is in fact an extensive revision of the analytical hierarchy process decision making model. The MCHM mainly functions across the idea screening phase (Stage 2) up to the business and feasibility analysis phase (Stage 4). Moreover, unlike its predecessors, the MultiCriteria Hierarchical Model is less dependent upon numerical scores allotted by expert opinion and apparently broader in its scope of application. Furthermore, the proposed framework elucidates the active participation of the MCHM in product design and development by conjoining with an artificial intelligence based computer system known as expert systems. The principal objective of the proposed conceptual framework is to deliver a thorough assessment and a feasible roadmap for the development of sustainable medical devices.

[1]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processes , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  An AHP approach to assess new product development performance: An exploratory study , 2010 .

[3]  S. D’Alessandro,et al.  The Role of Income Distribution in the Diffusion of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2015 .

[4]  G. Fahy,et al.  Cryopreservation of complex systems: the missing link in the regenerative medicine supply chain. , 2006, Rejuvenation research.

[5]  N. Ismail,et al.  Application of analytical hierarchy process in the design concept selection of automotive composite bumper beam during the conceptual design stage , 2009 .

[6]  Ron Janssen Multiobjective Decision Support for Environmental Management , 1992 .

[7]  Michael Zwicky Hauschild,et al.  From Life Cycle Assessment to Sustainable Production: Status and Perspectives , 2005 .

[8]  David M. Miller,et al.  A knowledge-based approach to design for manufacturability , 1993, J. Intell. Manuf..

[9]  Robert W. Hitchcock,et al.  Towards sustainable design for single-use medical devices , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  M. M. Akarte Casting Process Selection using AHP and Fuzzy Logic , 2000 .

[11]  Rambabu Kodali,et al.  An application of analytic hierarchy process for the selection of a methodology to improve the product development process , 2012 .

[12]  Satish Nukala,et al.  Multi-criteria analysis of potential recovery facilities in a reverse supply chain , 2005, SPIE Optics East.

[13]  Paul Krugman,et al.  End This Depression Now , 2016 .

[14]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  An evaluation model of new product launch strategy , 2006 .

[15]  M. Hilbert,et al.  Toward a synthesis of cognitive biases: how noisy information processing can bias human decision making. , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  Matthew J. Liberatore,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: A literature review , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Tian Zhang,et al.  Applying combined AHP-QFD method in new product development: A case study in developing new sports earphone , 2011, MSIE 2011.

[19]  Angelo Corallo,et al.  Enhancing product development through knowledge‐based engineering (KBE) , 2009 .

[20]  Johannes Fresner,et al.  The theory of inventive problem solving (TRIZ) as option generation tool within cleaner production projects , 2010 .

[21]  Ren-Jye Yang,et al.  Multidisciplinary design optimization of a vehicle system in a scalable, high performance computing environment , 2004 .

[22]  Sang Hun Lee,et al.  A CAD-CAE integration approach using feature-based multi-resolution and multi-abstraction modelling techniques , 2005, Comput. Aided Des..

[23]  Christian Parenti,et al.  Tropic of Chaos: Climate Change and the New Geography of Violence , 2011 .

[24]  Linda C. Schmidt,et al.  A Conceptual Design Tool for Resolving Conflicts Between Product Functionality and Environmental Impact , 2010 .

[25]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Energy Decisions and the Environment: A Guide to the Use of Multicriteria Methods , 2000 .

[26]  C. Jasch Environmental performance evaluation and indicators , 2000 .

[27]  C. Murray,et al.  Modeling the effects of health on economic growth. , 2001, Journal of health economics.

[28]  Robin Cowan,et al.  Expert systems: aspects of and limitations to the codifiability of knowledge , 2001 .

[29]  Umberto Cugini,et al.  Computer-Aided Conceptual Design Through TRIZ-based Manipulation of Topological Optimizations , 2009 .

[30]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Evaluation of design process alternatives using signal flow graphs , 2000 .

[31]  Amy J. C. Trappey,et al.  Development of a patent document classification and search platform using a back-propagation network , 2006, Expert Syst. Appl..

[32]  Y. Rahmat-Samii,et al.  Genetic algorithm (GA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) in engineering electromagnetics , 2003, 17th International Conference on Applied Electromagnetics and Communications, 2003. ICECom 2003..

[33]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[34]  T. Saaty How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[35]  Daniele Regazzoni,et al.  Eco-design with TRIZ laws of evolution , 2011 .

[36]  Philip H Long,et al.  Medical Devices in Orthopedic Applications , 2008, Toxicologic pathology.

[37]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  Development of a framework for assessing sustainability in new product development , 2009 .

[38]  Daniel Schrage,et al.  A Systems Engineering Modeling and Simulation Approach for Rotorcraft Drive System Optimization , 2011 .

[39]  Katja Hölttä-Otto,et al.  Degree of Modularity in Engineering Systems and Products with Technical and Business Constraints , 2007, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[40]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[41]  Kenji Shimada Current Issues and Trends in Meshing and Geometric Processing for Computational Engineering Analyses , 2011, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[42]  Maria Giovanna Trotta Product Lifecycle Management: sustainability and knowledge management as keys in a complex system of product development , 2010 .

[43]  Yan Wang,et al.  Product lifecycle management challenges in trans-national environments , 2006 .

[44]  Vijitashwa Pandey,et al.  Varying Lifecycle Lengths Within a Product Take-Back Portfolio , 2010 .

[45]  R. Chiva-Gomez,et al.  Repercussions of complex adaptive systems on product design management , 2004 .

[46]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  On the Coordination of Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Using Expert Systems , 2010, LION.

[47]  Gerhard Rakhorst,et al.  Product Design Planning with the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Inter-Organizational Networks , 2002 .

[48]  Keun-Tae Cho,et al.  Selecting medical devices and materials for development in Korea: the analytic hierarchy process approach. , 2003, The International journal of health planning and management.

[49]  Pj Clarkson,et al.  Comparing representations for product architecture design through life-cycle evaluation methods , 2009 .

[50]  Anil A. Kumar,et al.  Production and operations management: with skill development, caselets and cases , 2008 .

[51]  J. Fiksel Sustainability and Resilience: Toward a Systems Approach , 2006, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[52]  Nicholas Wapshott Keynes Hayek: The Clash that Defined Modern Economics , 2011 .

[53]  Kadir Çavdar,et al.  Development of a knowledge-based expert system for solving metal cutting problems , 2006 .

[54]  Cengiz Yilmaz,et al.  Learning Process in New Product Development Teams and Effects on Product Success: A Socio-Cognitive Perspective , 2006 .

[55]  Kenneth Hermele The Use and Misuse of Reductionist Measures of the Nature-Economy Interface , 2009 .

[56]  Cathy Ying Xu,et al.  Sustainable Product Development And Business Performance: A Product Life Cycle Approach , 2005 .

[57]  T. Gutowski,et al.  Appliance remanufacturing and life cycle energy and economic savings , 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology.

[58]  Atsuo Murata,et al.  The Development of the Computer Aided Remanufacturing System (CARES) Part I : Software Development (Phase I) and a Simulation Study , 2009 .

[59]  Zhengwei Zhang,et al.  A fuzzy-AHP comprehensive evaluation method for optimization design of machine tool , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Mechanic Automation and Control Engineering.

[60]  Warit Jawjit,et al.  Assessing environmental performance by combining life cycle assessment, multi-criteria analysis and environmental performance indicators , 2007 .

[61]  Madhusudan Therani,et al.  Practitioner requirements for integrated Knowledge Based Engineering in PLM , 2008 .

[62]  Prasanta Kumar Dey,et al.  Project risk management: a combined analytic hierarchy process and decision tree approach , 2002 .

[63]  Khalid A. Eldrandaly An Intelligent MCDM Approach for Selecting the Suitable Expert System Building Tool , 2007, Int. Arab J. Inf. Technol..

[64]  J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy expert systems and fuzzy reasoning , 2004 .

[65]  Pablo Bermell-Garcia,et al.  Practitioner requirements for integrated Knowledge-Based Engineering in Product Lifecycle Management , 2008 .