Bias and Efficiency Tradeoffs in the Selection of Storm Suites Used to Estimate Flood Risk

Modern joint probability methods for estimating storm surge or flood statistics are based on statistical aggregation of many hydrodynamic simulations that can be computationally expensive. Flood risk assessments that consider changing future conditions due to sea level rise or other drivers often require each storm to be run under a range of uncertain scenarios. Evaluating different flood risk mitigation measures, such as levees and floodwalls, in these future scenarios can further increase the computational cost. This study uses the Coastal Louisiana Risk Assessment model (CLARA) to examine tradeoffs between the accuracy of estimated flood depth exceedances and the number and type of storms used to produce the estimates. Inclusion of lower-intensity, higher-frequency storms significantly reduces bias relative to storm suites with a similar number of storms but only containing high-intensity, lower-frequency storms, even when estimating exceedances at very low-frequency return periods.

[1]  Gerald A. Meehl,et al.  Weather and Climate Extremes in a Changing Climate. Regions of Focus: North America, Hawaii, Caribbean, and U.S. Pacific Islands , 2008 .

[2]  Clint Dawson,et al.  Performance of the Unstructured-Mesh, SWAN+ADCIRC Model in Computing Hurricane Waves and Surge , 2011, Journal of Scientific Computing.

[3]  J. Irish,et al.  A surge response function approach to coastal hazard assessment. Part 2: Quantification of spatial attributes of response functions , 2009 .

[4]  Christopher W. Reed,et al.  Efficient joint-probability methods for hurricane surge frequency analysis , 2010 .

[5]  Benjamin P. Bryant,et al.  Coastal Louisiana Risk Assessment Model: Technical Description and 2012 Coastal Master Plan Analysis Results , 2012 .

[6]  J. Martinich,et al.  Joint effects of storm surge and sea-level rise on US Coasts: new economic estimates of impacts, adaptation, and benefits of mitigation policy , 2014, Climatic Change.

[7]  G. Vecchi,et al.  Twenty-first-century projections of North Atlantic tropical storms from CMIP5 models , 2012 .

[8]  Donald T. Resio,et al.  A surge response function approach to coastal hazard assessment – part 1: basic concepts , 2009 .

[9]  F. R. Clark,et al.  Surge and Wave Modeling for the Louisiana 2012 Coastal Master Plan , 2013 .

[10]  P. Webster,et al.  Changes in Tropical Cyclone Number, Duration, and Intensity in a Warming Environment , 2005, Science.

[11]  Does the size of hurricane eye matter with its intensity? , 2006 .

[12]  V. A. Myers.  Joint probability method of tide frequency analysis applied to Atlantic City and Long Beach Island, N.J , 1970 .

[13]  G. Holland,et al.  Tropical cyclones and climate change , 2010, Tropical Cyclone Research and Review.

[14]  David R. Johnson.  Improving Flood Risk Estimates and Mitigation Policies in Coastal Louisiana under Deep Uncertainty , 2013 .

[15]  J. Feyen,et al.  A Basin to Channel-Scale Unstructured Grid Hurricane Storm Surge Model Applied to Southern Louisiana , 2008 .

[16]  David G. Groves,et al.  Louisiana's 2012 Coastal Master Plan: Overview of a Science-Based and Publicly Informed Decision-Making Process , 2013 .

[17]  K. Kuhn,et al.  Current and Future Flood Risk in Greater New Orleans , 2015 .

[18]  K. Emanuel.  Downscaling CMIP5 climate models shows increased tropical cyclone activity over the 21st century , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  D. Resio.  White paper on estimating hurricane inundation probabilities , 2007 .

[20]  Jordan R. Fischbach,et al.  Estimating Surge-Based Flood Risk with the Coastal Louisiana Risk Assessment Model , 2013 .

[21]  N. Booij,et al.  THE "SWAN" WAVE MODEL FOR SHALLOW WATER , 1997 .

[22]  Virginia Burkett,et al.  Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerabilities: A Technical Input to the 2013 National Climate Assessment , 2012 .