The effects of word orientation and imageability on visual half-field presentations with a lexical decision task

Two studies examined the effects of word orientation and word imageability in a visual half-field procedure. The studies involved a lexical decision task in which items were presented in either a horizontal or vertical orientation randomly intermixed in Experiment 1 and blocked in Experiment 2. Overall, a RVF advantage resulted with horizontal items, yet no visual-field asymmetries were found with the vertical items. These results indicate that altering the orientation can affect visual-field superiority. It is proposed that the novelty of vertical displays leads to greater involvement of the right hemisphere. Imageability was related to performance only for horizontal displays; but there were no significant differences in imageability effects between the two visual fields. It is concluded that word imageability has little effect on visual-field differences, at least not for lexical decisions.

[1]  E K Warrington,et al.  Concrete word dyslexia. , 1981, British journal of psychology.

[2]  K. Heilman,et al.  Mirror-reading in right- and left-handers , 1982, Brain and Language.

[3]  J. Schmuller,et al.  Bilateral tachistoscopic perception, handedness, and laterality , 1979, Brain and Language.

[4]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  The Integrated Mind , 1978, Springer US.

[5]  H. Ellis,et al.  Recognition of abstract and concrete words presented in left and right visual fields. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  Visual field differences in verbal tasks: Effects of task familiarity and sex of subject , 1978, Brain and Language.

[7]  F. Allard,et al.  Visual hemifield differences depend on typeface , 1976, Brain and Language.

[8]  B. Shanon Lateralization Effects in Response to Words and Non-Words , 1979, Cortex.

[9]  A. Stewart,et al.  The time course of lateral asymmetries in visual perception of letters. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  S M Anstis,et al.  Letter: A chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position. , 1974, Vision research.

[11]  T. Pring The Effect of Stimulus Size and Exposure Duration on Visual Field Asymmetries , 1981, Cortex.

[12]  R. E. Hicks,et al.  Lexical discrimination and letter-string identification in the two visual fields , 1979, Brain and Language.

[13]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  The use of laterally presented words in research into cerebral asymmetry: Is directional scanning likely to be a source of artifact? , 1981, Brain and Language.

[14]  J. Orbach Differential recognition of Hebrew and English words in right and left visual fields as a function of cerebral dominance and reading habits , 1967 .

[15]  Lateralization effects in lexical decision tasks , 1979, Brain and Language.

[16]  D. Hines Difference's in Tachistoscopic Recognition Between Abstract and Concrete Words as a Function of Visual Half-Field and Frequency , 1977, Cortex.

[17]  A. Young,et al.  Age-of-acquisition and recognition of nouns presented in the left and right visual fields: A failed hypothesis , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  R. Logie,et al.  Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words , 1980 .

[19]  M. P. Bryden,et al.  Laterality: Functional Asymmetry in the Intact Brain , 1982 .

[20]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  Bihemispheric involvement in lexical decisions: Handedness and a possible sex difference , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  I. Nachshon,et al.  Developmental aspects of visual hemifield differences in perception of verbal material , 1976, Brain and Language.

[22]  I. Nachshon,et al.  Dissociation of hemifield reaction time differences from verbal stimulus directionality. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  M. White Does Cerebral Dominance Offer a Sufficient Explanation for Laterality Differences in Tachistoscopic Recognition? , 1973, Perceptual and motor skills.

[24]  S. Dimond,et al.  Left field superiority for word matching. , 1972, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[26]  J. Day,et al.  Visual half-field word recognition as a function of syntactic class and imageability , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  W. Heron,et al.  Perception as a function of retinal locus and attention. , 1957, The American journal of psychology.

[28]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[29]  Alan Searleman,et al.  A review of right hemisphere linguistic capabilities. , 1977, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  D B Boles,et al.  Dissociated imageability, concreteness, and familiarity in lateralized word recognition , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[31]  H. B. Orenstein,et al.  Recognition of bilaterally presented words varying in concreteness and frequency: Lateral dominance or sequential processing? , 1976 .

[32]  Joseph B. Hellige,et al.  Right hemisphere superiority for initial stages of letter processing , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  J. Day,et al.  Right-hemisphere language processing in normal right-handers. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  J. Rosen,et al.  Tachistoscopic word recognition performance under conditions of simultaneous bilateral presentation , 1975, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  J. Jonides Left and Right Visual Field Superiority for Letter Classification , 1979, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[36]  A. Paivio Imagery and verbal processes , 1972 .

[37]  K. M. Gill,et al.  Visual Half-Field Differences in the Recognition of Bilaterally Presented Single Letters and Vertically Spelled Words , 1972, Perceptual and motor skills.

[38]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  Laterally presented words: Orthographic analysis and serial, parallel or holistic modes of processing , 1982 .

[39]  W. McKeever Does Post-Exposural Directional Scanning Offer a Sufficient Explanation for Lateral Differences in Tachistoscopic Recognition? , 1974, Perceptual and motor skills.

[40]  John L. Bradshaw,et al.  Human cerebral asymmetry , 1978, Trends in Neurosciences.

[41]  M. White,et al.  Laterality differences in perception: a review. , 1969, Psychological bulletin.

[42]  J. Polich,et al.  Hemispheric differences in stimulus identification , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  B. Shanon Lateralization effects in the perception of Hebrew and English words , 1982, Brain and Language.

[44]  D. Besner Deep dyslexia and the right-hemisphere hypothesis: What’s left? , 1981 .

[45]  H. Taylor Age differences in peripheral letter perception. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.