Left in limbo – Experiences and needs among postmenopausal women newly diagnosed with osteoporosis without preceding osteoporotic fractures: A qualitative study

Introduction Despite the fact that the first osteoporotic fracture is preventable, osteoporosis is still a major health challenge. The disease is highly prevalent among postmenopausal women. However little is known about how to meet and support women, when they are diagnosed with osteoporosis without preceding fractures. Therefore this study aims at gaining a deeper understanding of how women experience being diagnosed. Furthermore to describe and identify their needs, which should be met in future healthcare services. Methods We conducted a phenomenological qualitative study. We included 17 women aged 52–65 and collected data through semi-structured interviews. We analysed data following Giorgi's methodology. Findings Needs among the women were classified into three main themes: (1) needs of targeted and tailored information about osteoporosis, (2) needs of being prepared for GP visit to participate in treatment decision-making and (3) needs of being able to take care of bone health. Conclusion and implications In general the women experienced as been left ‘in limbo’, and they requested targeted and tailored information about osteoporosis. In particular, they want information about dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan results and treatment options in advance of the GP visit. This will help them in being prepared and able to participate in treatment decisions. They ask for support in self-management of the disease with less focus on disease and risk of fracture. Instead, they demand more attention on the benefits of detecting early stage osteoporosis. The study highlights the call for new approaches to postmenopausal women newly diagnosed with osteoporosis without preceding fractures.

[1]  K. Malterud,et al.  Women's needs and wants when seeing the GP in relation to menopausal issues , 2004, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[2]  B. Pedersen,et al.  Anti-osteoporotic therapy in Denmark—predictors and demographics of poor refill compliance and poor persistence , 2013, Osteoporosis International.

[3]  A. Giorgi,et al.  A Qualitative Effort to Describe Experience Scientifically Review ofThe descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach , 2009, History & Philosophy of Psychology.

[4]  S. Reventlow Perceived risk of osteoporosis: restricted physical activities? Qualitative interview study with women in their sixties. , 2007, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[5]  D. Frosch The patient is the most important member of the team , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  A. Coulter,et al.  Time to deliver patient centred care , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  John Weinman,et al.  How do osteoporosis patients perceive their illness and treatment? Implications for clinical practice , 2012, Archives of Osteoporosis.

[8]  R. Lindsay,et al.  Longitudinal progression of fracture prevalence through a population of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[9]  S. Reventlow,et al.  Brittle bones: Ageing or threat of disease Exploring women's cultural models of osteoporosis , 2006, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[10]  Joanne M. Weston,et al.  The Invisible Disease , 2011, Qualitative health research.

[11]  K. Malterud,et al.  Making the invisible body visible. Bone scans, osteoporosis and women's bodily experiences. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[12]  Louise Locock,et al.  Collecting data on patient experience is not enough: they must be used to improve care , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  K. Barker,et al.  A qualitative systematic review of patients’ experience of osteoporosis using meta-ethnography , 2016, Archives of Osteoporosis.

[14]  L. Shepstone,et al.  Risk, significance and biomedicalisation of a new population: older women's experience of osteoporosis screening. , 2011, Social science & medicine.

[15]  K. Malterud,et al.  Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies , 2016, Qualitative health research.

[16]  D. Bhattacharya,et al.  Abandoned Acid? Understanding Adherence to Bisphosphonate Medications for the Prevention of Osteoporosis among Older Women: A Qualitative Longitudinal Study , 2014, PloS one.

[17]  D. Gold,et al.  Osteoporosis Self-management:Choices For Better Bone Health , 2004, Southern medical journal.

[18]  D. Beaton,et al.  Non-pharmacological strategies used by patients at high risk for future fracture to manage fracture risk—a qualitative study , 2013, Osteoporosis International.

[19]  M. Gallant The Influence of Social Support on Chronic Illness Self-Management: A Review and Directions for Research , 2003, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[20]  O Johnell,et al.  A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. , 2004, Bone.

[21]  Opinder Sahota,et al.  Handling knowledge on osteoporosis--a qualitative study. , 2013, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[22]  Juhani Vaivio,et al.  Interviews – Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing , 2012 .

[23]  K. Malterud,et al.  Awareness of risk of osteoporosis may cause uncertainty and worry in menopausal women , 2005, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[24]  P. Vestergaard,et al.  Osteoporosis is markedly underdiagnosed: a nationwide study from Denmark , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[25]  Birthe D. Pedersen,et al.  Women’s lived experiences of learning to live with osteoporosis: a longitudinal qualitative study , 2017, BMC Women's Health.

[26]  B. Abrahamsen,et al.  Women's experiences of their osteoporosis diagnosis at the time of diagnosis and 6 months later: A phenomenological hermeneutic study. , 2014, International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being.

[27]  A. Giorgi,et al.  The Theory, Practice, and Evaluation of the Phenomenological Method as a Qualitative Research Procedure , 1997 .

[28]  J. A. Kanis,et al.  European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women , 2013, Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA.

[29]  J. Hibbard,et al.  What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. , 2013, Health affairs.

[30]  C. Cooper,et al.  Excess mortality following hip fracture: a systematic epidemiological review , 2009, Osteoporosis International.

[31]  Sue Roberts,et al.  Delivering person centred care in long term conditions , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[32]  S. Newman,et al.  Self-management interventions for chronic illness , 2004, The Lancet.

[33]  A. Bombak,et al.  Qualitative Insights from the Osteoporosis Research: A Narrative Review of the Literature , 2016, Journal of osteoporosis.