Condyle as the point of rotation for 3-D planning of distraction osteogenesis for hemifacial microsomia.

AIM The purpose of this study is to present an exact simulation method for mandibular rotational movement in distraction osteogenesis for hemifacial microsomia. METHODS Three-dimensional (3-D) surgery simulation software programmes (V-Works and V-Surgery; Cybermed, Seoul, Korea) were used, based on 3-D CT data in addition to the conventional data, which included facial photography, panoramic radiograph, cephalogram, and dental models. After measuring the mandibular deficiency (horizontal and vertical) from a 3-D model reconstructed using the software, the angulation of the distraction device to the mandibular border (posterior or inferior) was determined. The rotation axis in the V-Works simulation was defined as the line perpendicular to the plane made by condylion and the distraction vector location on the mandible. The mandible moves along the plane around this rotational axis during distraction. After the 3-D simulation with the software programme, mock surgery on a rapid prototyping model was performed. This planning method was applied to models of two hemifacial microsomia patients. RESULTS With this protocol, it was possible to simulate the rotational movement of the mandible on the axis passing through the condylar head of the unaffected side. CONCLUSION The sequential planning procedure presented in this paper is considered to be helpful in performing effective preoperative simulation of distraction osteogenesis for hemifacial microsomia.

[1]  M L Messersmith,et al.  An in vitro study of the accuracy of a new protocol for planning distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. , 2000, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[2]  D. Laufer,et al.  Intraoral distraction osteogenesis of the mandible in hemifacial microsomia. , 2001, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[3]  C. Kunz,et al.  Manipulation of Callus after Linear Distraction: A “Lifeboat” or an Alternative to Multivectorial Distraction Osteogenesis of the Mandible? , 2000, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

[4]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Molding of the Regenerate in Mandibular Distraction: Clinical Experience , 2003, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  J. McCarthy Distraction of the Craniofacial Skeleton , 1999, Springer New York.

[6]  M. Mommaerts,et al.  Is early osteodistraction a solution for the ascending ramus compartment in hemifacial microsomia? A literature study. , 2002, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[7]  Barkate He Orthognathic surgery by distraction osteogenesis: a literature review. , 1997 .

[8]  R. Manzanares,et al.  Intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis: special attention to treatment planning. , 2001, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[9]  R Kikinis,et al.  Development of a three-dimensional treatment planning system based on computed tomographic data. , 2002, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[10]  D. Buchbinder,et al.  Mandibular distraction osteogenesis: types, applications, and indications. , 1996, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[11]  D. Laufer,et al.  Lengthening of the mandible by distraction osteogenesis: report of cases. , 1995, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[12]  H. Wolfgang Losken,et al.  Planning Mandibular Distraction: Preliminary Report , 1995 .

[13]  A. Bozzetti,et al.  Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia: long-term follow-up. , 2005, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[14]  M. Vazquez,et al.  Submerged intraoral device for mandibular lengthening. , 1997, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[15]  Geometric evaluation of mandibular distraction. , 1995, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[16]  T D Taylor,et al.  Applications of distraction osteogenesis. Part I. , 1998, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[17]  M. B. Melugin,et al.  Orthodontic management of the patientundergoing mandibular distraction osteogenesis , 1999 .

[18]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Vector of Device Placement and Trajectory of Mandibular Distraction , 1997, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[19]  C. Kunz,et al.  Theoretical considerations for the surgical correction of mandibular deformity in hemifacial microsomia patients using multifocal distraction osteogenesis. , 2003, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.