Text or Talk? Social Anxiety, Loneliness, and Divergent Preferences for Cell Phone Use

This paper investigates whether social anxiety and loneliness lead to contrasting beliefs and preferences among cell phone users towards texting and talking on their cell phones. Three hypotheses are examined: (1) that social anxiety and loneliness are differentially associated with generalized preferences either for texting or for talking on the cell phone, (2) that these preferences are linked to contrasting beliefs concerning the social functionality of the short message service (SMS), and (3) that these divergent beliefs mediate the effects of social anxiety and loneliness on cell phone users' generalized preferences for texting or talking. Results from an Internet questionnaire (N=158) showed that, whilst lonely participants preferred making voice calls and rated texting as a less intimate method of contact, anxious participants preferred to text, and rated it a superior medium for expressive and intimate contact. These divergent beliefs accounted for 36% and 16% of the variance in preference for texting and voice calls, respectively, and significantly attenuated the influence of loneliness and social anxiety when they were added to the regression equations for these measures. Results are discussed in terms of the hyperpersonal possibilities of mobile communications technologies.

[1]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[2]  D. Russell.  UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure. , 1996, Journal of personality assessment.

[3]  Louis Leung,et al.  College Student Motives for Chatting on ICQ , 2001, New Media Soc..

[4]  R. Byrne,et al.  Preference for SMS versus telephone calls in initiating romantic relationships , 2004 .

[5]  R. Weiss,et al.  Loneliness: The Experience of Emotional and Social Isolation. , 1975 .

[6]  K. Durkin,et al.  Shyness and Computer-Mediated Communication: A Self-Presentational Theory Perspective , 2004 .

[7]  G. Miller,et al.  Handbook of Interpersonal Communication , 1985 .

[8]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Jason W. Osborne,et al.  Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. , 2005 .

[10]  H. Haste,et al.  Joined-Up Texting: The role of mobile phones in young people’s lives , 2005 .

[11]  Mark Aakhus,et al.  Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance , 2002 .

[12]  M. Leary.  Social anxiousness: the construct and its measurement. , 1983, Journal of personality assessment.

[13]  Lynne Hamill,et al.  Mobile world : past, present and future , 2005 .

[14]  Fraser J. M. Reid,et al.  Textmates and Text Circles: Insights into the Social Ecology of SMS Text Messaging , 2005 .

[15]  Richard Ling,et al.  Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway , 2002 .

[16]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  Social anxiety and self-presentation: a conceptualization and model. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  Phyllis Schumacher,et al.  Loneliness and social uses of the Internet , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  Deborah Ruth Richardson,et al.  Network Correlates of Social and Emotional Loneliness in Young and Older Adults , 2001 .

[19]  Scott E. Caplan.  Preference for Online Social Interaction , 2003, Commun. Res..

[20]  Eija-Liisa Kasesniemi,et al.  Mobile culture of children and teenagers in Finland , 2002 .

[21]  Jane M Spurr,et al.  The observer perspective: effects on social anxiety and performance. , 2003, Behaviour research and therapy.

[22]  Matthew S. Eastin,et al.  Teen Internet Use: Relating Social Perceptions and Cognitive Models to Behavior , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[23]  Tom Postmes,et al.  When are net effects gross products? The power of influence and the influence of power in computer-mediated communication. , 2002 .

[24]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[25]  J. Gackenbach.  Psychology and the Internet , 2006 .

[26]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[27]  Clare Wood,et al.  Txt msg n school literacy: does texting and knowledge of text abbreviations adversely affect children's literacy attainment? , 2008 .

[28]  R. LaRose,et al.  Understanding Internet Usage , 2001 .

[29]  R. L. Holbert,et al.  The Importance of Indirect Effects in Media Effects Research: Testing for Mediation in Structural Equation Modeling , 2003 .

[30]  Robin M. Kowalski,et al.  The Interaction Anxiousness Scale: construct and criterion-related validity. , 1993, Journal of personality assessment.