Status and Status Strain in the Professions

Professionals and nonprofessionals assign different status to the subspecialities of the various professions. This follows from their different bases for prestige assignment. Intraprofessional status rests on the exclusion of nonprofessional issues or of professional issues irrelevant in a particular case. Public status for professionals rests on effective contact with disorder or nonorder. In the pursuit of intraprofessional status, professions and professionals thus tend to withdraw from precisely those problems for which the public gives them status. This phenomenon of professional regression partly accounts for many otherwise incomprehensible aspects of professional life, such as the prominence of inappropriate training, the rapid dispersal of esoteric professional knowledge to the public, and the lack of systematic approaches to such important problems as death.

[1]  A. M. Carr-Saunders,et al.  The Qualifying Associations , 1965 .

[2]  H. Kohut,et al.  The analysis of the self , 1971 .

[3]  E. Laumann,et al.  Specialization and Prestige in the Legal Profession: The Structure of Deference , 1977 .

[4]  Joseph Bensman,et al.  Small town in mass society , 1957 .

[5]  J. Skolnick,et al.  Justice without trial , 1969 .

[6]  T. Hunter Boys in White , 1962 .

[7]  Roy M. Acheson,et al.  Profession and Monopoly , 1976 .

[8]  R. Merton,et al.  Columbia-Pennsylvania: studies in the sociology of medical education. , 1956, Journal of medical education.

[9]  P. Rossi,et al.  Occupational Prestige in the United States, 1925-63 , 1964, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  M. Defleur,et al.  THE RELATIVE CONTRIBUTION OF TELEVISION AS A LEARNING SOURCE FOR CHILDREN'S OCCUPATIONAL KNOWLEDGE * , 1967 .

[11]  P. Lochner The No Fee and Low Fee Legal Practice of Private Attorneys , 1975 .

[12]  Ivan Belknap Human Problems of a State Mental Hospital , 1957 .

[13]  A. Aiyappan,et al.  Society in India , 1956 .

[14]  W. E. Henry,et al.  Public and Private Lives of Psychotherapists , 1973 .

[15]  Richard P. Bailey The Culture of Professionalism , 1977 .

[16]  A. Inkeles,et al.  National Comparisons of Occupational Prestige , 1956, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  R. E. Simonson Human Problems of a State Mental Hospital , 1957 .

[18]  Simon Kuznets,et al.  Income from Independent Professional Practice. , 1946 .

[19]  J. Stevenson,et al.  The Wall Street Lawyer , 1964 .

[20]  N. Morris,et al.  A Proposal for the Abolition of the Incompetency Plea , 1972 .

[21]  R. Acheson Medical Practice in Modern England , 1967, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[22]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  Occupational Specialization as an Emergent Process , 1973 .

[23]  E. Laumann Prestige And Association In An Urban Community , 1966 .

[24]  M. Defleur OCCUPATIONAL ROLES AS PORTRAYED ON TELEVISION , 1964 .

[25]  R. Marsh The Explanation of Occupational Prestige Hierarchies , 1971 .

[26]  The perception of prestige differences among medical subspecialities. , 1973, Social science & medicine.

[27]  J. Bruhn,et al.  MEDICAL STUDENT ATTITUDES TOWARD FOUR MEDICAL SPECIALTIES. , 1964, Journal of medical education.

[28]  O. Garceau,et al.  The Political Life of the American Medical Association. , 1942 .

[29]  T. Parsons The Professions and Social Structure , 1939 .

[30]  S. Shortell,et al.  Occupational prestige differences within the medical and allied health professions. , 1974, Social science & medicine.

[31]  E. Freidson The Profession of Medicine , 1923 .

[32]  M. Larson The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis , 1977 .