Digital repeat photography for phenological research in forest ecosystems

Abstract Digital repeat photography has the potential to become an important long-term data source for phenological research given its advantages in terms of logistics, continuity, consistency and objectivity over traditional assessments of vegetation status by human observers. Red-green-blue (RGB) color channel information from digital images can be separately extracted as digital numbers, and subsequently summarized through color indices such as excess green (ExG = 2G − [R + B]) or through nonlinear transforms to chromatic coordinates or other color spaces. Previous studies have demonstrated the use of ExG and the green chromatic coordinate (gcc = G/[R + G + B]) from digital landscape image archives for tracking canopy development but several methodological questions remained unanswered. These include the effects of diurnal, seasonal and weather-related changes in scene illumination on ExG and gcc, and digital camera and image file format choice. We show that gcc is generally more effective than ExG in suppressing the effects of changes in scene illumination. To further reduce these effects we propose a moving window approach that assigns the 90th percentile of all daytime values within a three-day window to the center day (per90), resulting in three-day ExG and gcc. Using image archives from eleven forest sites in North America, we demonstrate that per90 is able to further reduce unwanted variability in ExG and gcc due to changes in scene illumination compared to previously used mean mid-day values of ExG and gcc. Comparison of eleven different digital cameras at Harvard Forest (autumn 2010) indicates that camera and image file format choice might be of secondary importance for phenological research: with the exception of inexpensive indoor webcams, autumn patterns of changes in gcc and ExG from images in common JPEG image file format were in good agreement, especially toward the end of senescence. Due to its greater effectiveness in suppressing changes in scene illumination, especially in combination with per90, we advocate the use of gcc for phenological research. Our results indicate that gcc from different digital cameras can be used for comparing the timing of key phenological events (e.g., complete leaf coloring) across sites. However, differences in how specific cameras “see” the forest canopy may obscure subtle phenological changes that could be detectable if a common protocol was implemented across sites.

[1]  Edward M. Barnes,et al.  Method for Using Images from a Color Digital Camera to Estimate Flower Number , 2000 .

[2]  P. Pinter,et al.  Measuring Wheat Senescence with a Digital Camera , 1999 .

[3]  G. Meyer,et al.  Color indices for weed identification under various soil, residue, and lighting conditions , 1994 .

[4]  Stefan Jansson,et al.  Intermittent low temperatures constrain spring recovery of photosynthesis in boreal Scots pine forests , 2004 .

[5]  Jing Li Wang,et al.  Color image segmentation: advances and prospects , 2001, Pattern Recognit..

[6]  N. Coops,et al.  A NEW, AUTOMATED, MULTIANGULAR RADIOMETER INSTRUMENT FOR TOWER-BASED OBSERVATIONS OF CANOPY REFLECTANCE (AMSPEC II) , 2010 .

[7]  Andrew D. Richardson,et al.  Phenological Differences Between Understory and Overstory: A Case Study Using the Long-Term Harvard Forest Records , 2009 .

[8]  C. Tucker.  Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation , 1979 .

[9]  Andrew D Richardson,et al.  Near-surface remote sensing of spatial and temporal variation in canopy phenology. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[10]  Annette Menzel,et al.  Temperature response rates from long-term phenological records , 2005 .

[11]  Geert Verhoeven,et al.  It's all about the format – unleashing the power of RAW aerial photography , 2010 .

[12]  Andrew D. Richardson,et al.  Phenology of a northern hardwood forest canopy , 2006 .

[13]  Craig Macfarlane,et al.  Measurement of Crown Cover and Leaf Area Index Using Digital Cover Photography and Its Application to Remote Sensing , 2009, Remote. Sens..

[14]  Robert Pless,et al.  The global network of outdoor webcams: properties and applications , 2009, GIS.

[15]  H. Wanner,et al.  Tree phenology and carbon dioxide fluxes - use of digital photography for process-based interpretation at the ecosystem scale , 2009 .

[16]  Annette Menzel,et al.  Time series modeling and central European temperature impact assessment of phenological records over the last 250 years , 2008 .

[17]  Eric A. Davidson,et al.  Spatial and temporal variability in forest–atmosphere CO2 exchange , 2004 .

[18]  W. Cleveland.  Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots , 1979 .

[19]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Factors controlling CO2 exchange on timescales from hourly to decadal at Harvard Forest , 2007 .

[20]  Lee A. Vierling,et al.  A simple filtered photodiode instrument for continuous measurement of narrowband NDVI and PRI over vegetated canopies , 2010 .

[21]  D. Hollinger,et al.  Use of digital webcam images to track spring green-up in a deciduous broadleaf forest , 2007, Oecologia.

[22]  Thomas Hilker,et al.  Using digital time-lapse cameras to monitor species-specific understorey and overstorey phenology in support of wildlife habitat assessment , 2011, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[23]  G. Meyer,et al.  Verification of color vegetation indices for automated crop imaging applications , 2008 .

[24]  M. Rossini,et al.  Using digital repeat photography and eddy covariance data to model grassland phenology and photosynthetic CO2 uptake , 2011 .

[25]  S. Christensen,et al.  Colour and shape analysis techniques for weed detection in cereal fields , 2000 .

[26]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Tracking the structural and functional development of a perennial pepperweed (Lepidium latifolium L.) infestation using a multi-year archive of webcam imagery and eddy covariance measurements , 2011 .

[27]  Reiko Ide,et al.  Use of digital cameras for phenological observations , 2010, Ecol. Informatics.

[28]  T. A. Black,et al.  Comparison of carbon dioxide fluxes over three boreal black spruce forests in Canada , 2007 .

[29]  Hans Peter Schmid,et al.  Measurements of CO2 and energy fluxes over a mixed hardwood forest in the mid-western United States , 2000 .

[30]  Hella Ellen Ahrends,et al.  Quantitative phenological observations of a mixed beech forest in northern Switzerland with digital photography , 2008 .

[31]  S. Kurc,et al.  Digital image-derived greenness links deep soil moisture to carbon uptake in a creosotebush-dominated shrubland , 2010 .

[32]  Alan R. Gillespie,et al.  Color enhancement of highly correlated images. II. Channel ratio and “chromaticity” transformation techniques , 1987 .

[33]  R. Monson,et al.  Carbon sequestration in a high‐elevation, subalpine forest , 2001 .

[34]  W. Cleveland,et al.  Locally Weighted Regression: An Approach to Regression Analysis by Local Fitting , 1988 .

[35]  D. Hollinger,et al.  Influence of spring phenology on seasonal and annual carbon balance in two contrasting New England forests. , 2009, Tree physiology.

[36]  J. Abatzoglou,et al.  Tracking the rhythm of the seasons in the face of global change: phenological research in the 21st century. , 2009 .

[37]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Public Internet‐connected cameras used as a cross‐continental ground‐based plant phenology monitoring system , 2010 .

[38]  Kazukiyo Yamamoto,et al.  Effects of image quality, size and camera type on forest light environment estimates using digital hemispherical photography , 2004 .

[39]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Testing the performance of a novel spectral reflectance sensor, built with light emitting diodes (LEDs), to monitor ecosystem metabolism, structure and function , 2010 .