Estimation of reciprocal residual flexibility from experimental modal data

A technique is presented for estimating the residual flexibility between nonexcited structural degrees of freedom from experimental structural vibration data. Using this method, one can include the residual flexibility estimated from modal measurements in the computation of measured flexibility for experiments with incomplete reciprocity, i.e., when the response and excitation measurement sensors are not fully collocated. The method can also be used to estimate the unknown entries in the residual flexibility matrix for experimental component mode synthesis when excitations are not provided at all interface degrees of freedom. A general solution is presented that contains an unknown positive semidefinite contribution. The general solution satisfies modal orthogonality in the limit that all of the structural degrees of freedom are instrumented and when the positive semidefinite contribution lies in a nullspace defined by the stiffness matrix and the modal flexibility. With a limited number of measurements, modal orthogonality is shown to be satisfied to the extent that the measured modes are preserved by static condensation. A rank-deficient solution is presented that allows the residual to be used in the computation of the flexibility matrix without further modeling assumptions. Numerical and experimental results that demonstrate the application of the method to both flexibility matrix convergence and experimental component mode synthesis are presented.

[1]  R. Guyan Reduction of stiffness and mass matrices , 1965 .

[2]  R. Macneal A hybrid method of component mode synthesis , 1971 .

[3]  S. Rubin Improved Component-Mode Representation for Structural Dynamic Analysis , 1975 .

[4]  R. Craig,et al.  On the use of attachment modes in substructure coupling for dynamic analysis , 1977 .

[5]  H. Saunders Book Reviews : NUMERICAL METHODS IN FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS K.-J. Bathe and E.L. Wilson Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ , 1978 .

[6]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[7]  R. Blevins,et al.  Formulas for natural frequency and mode shape , 1984 .

[8]  D. J. Ewins,et al.  Modal Testing: Theory and Practice , 1984 .

[9]  T. G. Carne,et al.  Combined experimental/analytical modeling using component mode synthesis , 1984 .

[10]  Henry T. Y. Yang Finite Element Structural Analysis , 1985 .

[11]  SuzanneWeaver Smith,et al.  Model Correlation and Damage Location for Large Space Truss Structures , 1991 .

[12]  Michael L. Tinker,et al.  Residual flexibility test method for verification of constrained structural models , 1992 .

[13]  François M. Hemez,et al.  Selection of experimental modal data sets for damage detection via model update , 1993 .

[14]  Kenneth F. Alvin Second-order structural identification via state space-based system realizations , 1993 .

[15]  K. Alvin,et al.  A time and frequency domain procedure for identification of structural dynamic models , 1994 .

[16]  Ahmet E. Aktan,et al.  Bridge-condition assessment by modal flexibility , 1994 .

[17]  D. Zimmerman,et al.  Structural damage detection using a minimum rank update theory , 1994 .

[18]  Lee D. Peterson,et al.  Method for determining minimum-order mass and stiffness matrices from modal test data , 1995 .

[19]  L. Peterson,et al.  Measurement of static flexibility matrices for experiments with incomplete reciprocity , 1995 .

[20]  Lee D. Peterson Efficient computation of the eigensystem realization algorithm , 1995 .

[21]  Lee D. Peterson,et al.  Analysis of nonlinear mechanisms in a precision deployable structure using measured flexibility , 1996 .

[22]  G. H. James,et al.  Damage detection in aircraft structures using dynamically measured static flexibility matrices , 1996 .

[23]  Lee D. Peterson,et al.  Model Update Using Modal Contribution to Static Flexibility Error , 1997 .