Accuracy of simulated data for bifacial systems with varying tilt angles and share of diffuse radiation

Potential investors in bifacial PV systems are still deterred by the uncertainty of energy yield predictions. Validation of the prediction methods and establishing an accuracy range is therefore a central prerequisite concerning the bankability of the bifacial technology. Because of the sensitivity on multiple additional factors compared to standard monofacial installations, the yield simulation of a bifacial PV array is far more complicated. The available simulation tools for bifacial systems still have to prove their reliability, also for predicting the effect of varying ambient and installation conditions. Moreover, bifacial devices enable new types of applications, such as vertical installations. In this work, we compare the results of simulation tools developed at ISC Konstanz and ECN.TNO, as well as the output of the commercial PVsyst simulation software, to measured data. The measured data is obtained by a test rig that carries out a continuous and automated variation of the tilt angle. The test rig is not a single stand-alone module but an array in order to include shading effects of real extended systems. In addition, the measurements focus on a central module, which represents the conditions of a typical device in an array. Days with differing light intensity and share of diffuse radiation were chosen to determine the impact of the insolation conditions on the simulation accuracy. General trends with regard to the sensitivity to tilt and insolation conditions are analyzed in order to evaluate the quality of state-of-the-art bifacial energy yield simulations. © 2019 International Solar Energy Society

[1]  Joshua S. Stein,et al.  A review of crystalline silicon bifacial photovoltaic performance characterisation and simulation , 2019, Energy & Environmental Science.

[2]  Raymond K. Kostuk,et al.  Comparison of Bifacial Solar Irradiance Model Predictions With Field Validation , 2019, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[3]  R. Kopecek,et al.  Towards large-scale deployment of bifacial photovoltaics , 2018, Nature Energy.

[4]  H. Kurz,et al.  Analysis of the Annual Performance of Bifacial Modules and Optimization Methods , 2015, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[5]  M.W.P.E. Lamers,et al.  Temperature effects of bifacial modules: Hotter or cooler? , 2018, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells.

[6]  J. Michalsky,et al.  All-weather model for sky luminance distribution—Preliminary configuration and validation , 1993 .

[7]  T. Nordmann,et al.  15 Years of Practical Experience in Development and Improvement of Bifacial Photovoltaic Noise Barriers Along Highways and Railway Lines in Switzerland , 2012 .

[8]  Radovan Kopecek,et al.  Modelling of Bifacial Gain for Stand-alone and in-field Installed Bifacial PV Modules , 2016 .

[9]  P. Ineichen,et al.  A new simplified version of the perez diffuse irradiance model for tilted surfaces , 1987 .

[11]  Jose E. Castillo-Aguilella,et al.  Multi-Variable Bifacial Photovoltaic Module Test Results and Best-Fit Annual Bifacial Energy Yield Model , 2016, IEEE Access.

[12]  Asher Karsenty,et al.  PV module power gain due to bifacial design. Preliminary experimental and simulation data , 2010, 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[13]  Bas B. Van Aken,et al.  Outdoor Performance of Bifacial Modules by Measurements and Modelling , 2015 .

[14]  J. Michalsky,et al.  Modeling daylight availability and irradiance components from direct and global irradiance , 1990 .

[15]  R. Kopecek,et al.  Performance of Bifacial PV Arrays With Fixed Tilt and Horizontal Single-Axis Tracking: Comparison of Simulated and Measured Data , 2019, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[16]  Hartmut Nussbaumer,et al.  Energy yield prediction of a bifacial PV system with a miniaturized test array , 2019, Solar Energy.

[17]  Amir Asgharzadeh,et al.  Analysis of irradiance models for bifacial PV modules , 2016, 2016 IEEE 43rd Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC).

[18]  Clifford W. Hansen,et al.  A Practical Irradiance Model for Bifacial PV Modules , 2017 .

[19]  Jean-Emmanuel Broquin,et al.  A study of the annual performance of bifacial photovoltaic modules in the case of vertical facade integration , 2016 .

[20]  Taehyeon Kim,et al.  Bifacial solar photovoltaics – A technology review , 2016 .

[21]  Joseph Appelbaum,et al.  Bifacial photovoltaic panels field , 2016 .

[22]  Shin'ya Obara,et al.  Bifacial-PV Power Output Gain in the Field Test Using ""EarthON"" High Bifaciality Solar Cells , 2013 .

[23]  Shin'ya Obara,et al.  Analysis of output power and capacity reduction in electrical storage facilities by peak shift control of PV system with bifacial modules , 2014 .

[24]  Ingrid G. Romijn,et al.  Aspects of bifacial cell efficiency , 2017 .

[25]  Jenny Lam,et al.  Bifacial Photovoltaic Systems Energy Yield Modelling , 2015 .

[26]  Marius Peters,et al.  Vertically mounted bifacial photovoltaic modules: A global analysis , 2013 .

[27]  A. A. Mewe,et al.  Relation between indoor flash testing and outdoor performance of bifacial modules , 2014 .

[28]  L. Eltrop,et al.  Simulating the energy yield of a bifacial photovoltaic power plant , 2019, Solar Energy.

[29]  Miro Zeman,et al.  Maximizing annual yield of bifacial photovoltaic noise barriers , 2018 .

[30]  Markus Klenk,et al.  State-of-the-art bifacial module technology , 2018 .

[31]  Yun Seng Lim,et al.  Design and evaluation of passive concentrator and reflector systems for bifacial solar panel on a highly cloudy region – A case study in Malaysia , 2014 .

[32]  William A. Beckman,et al.  Improvement and validation of a model for photovoltaic array performance , 2006 .

[33]  Stefan Larsson,et al.  Testing Bifacial PV Cells in Symmetric and Asymmetric Concentrating CPC Collectors , 2013 .