Effectiveness of H5P in improving student learning outcomes in an online tertiary education setting

[1]  Rolf Ploetzner.  The effectiveness of enhanced interaction features in educational videos: a meta-analysis , 2022, Interactive Learning Environments.

[2]  Claudia Bohrmann‐Linde,et al.  H5P videos in chemical didactics , 2021 .

[3]  S. Rekhari,et al.  Reimagining physiology education with interactive content developed in H5P. , 2021, Advances in physiology education.

[4]  L. Mishra,et al.  Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, International Journal of Educational Research Open.

[5]  Yung-Ming Cheng.  Students' satisfaction and continuance intention of the cloud-based e-learning system: roles of interactivity and course quality factors , 2020 .

[6]  I. Kollar,et al.  Using digital technology to promote higher education learning: The importance of different learning activities and their relations to learning outcomes , 2020, Journal of Research on Technology in Education.

[7]  Chongwook Park,et al.  Perception of Instructor Presence and Its Effects on Learning Experience in Online Classes , 2020, J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res..

[8]  L. Major,et al.  Technology-supported personalised learning: Rapid Evidence Review , 2020 .

[9]  Matt Bower,et al.  Evaluation of technology use in education: Findings from a critical analysis of systematic literature reviews , 2020, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[10]  Chongwook Park,et al.  Exploring the Roles of Social Presence and Gender Difference in Online Learning , 2020 .

[11]  Alexander C. Thurman,et al.  How Many Ways Can We Define Online Learning? A Systematic Literature Review of Definitions of Online Learning (1988-2018) , 2019, American Journal of Distance Education.

[12]  C. Stone,et al.  Interactivity, connectedness and ‘teacher-presence': engaging and retaining students online , 2019 .

[13]  Chang Zhu,et al.  Investigating the relationship between success factors and student participation in online and blended learning in adult education , 2019, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[14]  Yung-Ming Cheng.  How does task-technology fit influence cloud-based e-learning continuance and impact? , 2019, Education + Training.

[15]  Julia Melkers,et al.  Can Online Delivery Increase Access to Education? , 2016, Journal of Labor Economics.

[16]  Manolis Mavrikis,et al.  Technology-enhanced Personalised Learning: Untangling the Evidence , 2018 .

[17]  Na Li,et al.  Translating the ICAP Theory of Cognitive Engagement Into Practice , 2018, Cogn. Sci..

[18]  A. W. Bates,et al.  Teaching in a Digital Age , 2015 .

[19]  Nitza Geri,et al.  A Learning Analytics Approach for Evaluating the Impact of Interactivity in Online Video Lectures on the Attention Span of Students , 2017 .

[20]  Danica Dolnicar,et al.  Attributes of digital natives as predictors of information literacy in higher education , 2017, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[21]  Cathy Stone,et al.  Opportunity through online learning: improving student access, participation and success in higher education , 2017 .

[22]  Papia Bawa,et al.  Retention in Online Courses , 2016 .

[23]  Arzu Deveci Topal.  Examination of University Students' Level of Satisfaction and Readiness for E-Courses and the Relationship between Them , 2016 .

[24]  M. Chi,et al.  The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes , 2014 .

[25]  Mike Keppell,et al.  Personalised Learning Strategies for Higher Education , 2014 .

[26]  Kym Fraser,et al.  The Future of Learning and Teaching in Next Generation Learning Spaces , 2014 .

[27]  Yung-Ming Cheng,et al.  Extending the expectation-confirmation model with quality and flow to explore nurses' continued blended e-learning intention , 2014, Inf. Technol. People.

[28]  Kathleen Poll,et al.  Six Instructional Best Practices for Online Engagement and Retention , 2014 .

[29]  Wen-Shan Lin,et al.  Antecedences to continued intentions of adopting e-learning system in blended learning instruction: A contingency framework based on models of information system success and task-technology fit , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[30]  J. W. Gikandi,et al.  Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[31]  Michelle Oja,et al.  Student Satisfaction and Student Performance , 2011 .

[32]  John Thompson,et al.  Best Practices In Asynchronous Online Course Discussions , 2011 .

[33]  Matthias Jarke,et al.  The 3P Learning Model , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[34]  T. Gog,et al.  A Theoretical Analysis of How Segmentation of Dynamic Visualizations Optimizes Students' Learning , 2010 .

[35]  Ming-Chi Lee,et al.  Explaining and predicting users' continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation-confirmation model , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[36]  Iain Doherty,et al.  Personalised Learning: A Case Study in Teaching Clinical Educators Instructional Design Skills , 2010 .

[37]  Jared Keengwe,et al.  Towards Best Practices in Online Learning and Teaching in Higher Education , 2010 .

[38]  Tor J. Larsen,et al.  The role of task-technology fit as users' motivation to continue information system use , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[39]  Stacy L. Williams,et al.  The Effectiveness of Distance Education in Allied Health Science Programs: A Meta-Analysis of Outcomes , 2006 .

[40]  J. Biggs.  Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment , 1996 .